PS2 or PC

Talk about NBA Live 2005 here.

What should I get 2005 for?

PS2
9
29%
PC
22
71%
 
Total votes : 31

PS2 or PC

Postby sebassss on Sat Aug 21, 2004 2:00 am

gimme some help here
User avatar
sebassss
 
Posts: 44
Joined: Thu Aug 19, 2004 1:50 am

Postby Riot on Sat Aug 21, 2004 2:02 am

uh, XBOX
User avatar
Riot
WHAT DA F?!?! CHEEZITS!?
 
Posts: 6870
Joined: Tue Jun 15, 2004 10:23 am

Postby PRoPuLsiOnDJ on Sat Aug 21, 2004 4:08 pm

definitely PC .... there's no comparison there
PRoPuLsiOnDJ
 
Posts: 450
Joined: Fri Jan 23, 2004 4:36 pm
Location: Los Angeles, CA

Postby Andrew on Sat Aug 21, 2004 4:16 pm

This could go in NBA Live 2005 issues. ;)

If your PC's specs are worthy, I'd recommend the PC version for the patches and the ability to edit the rosters outside the game by modifying the DBF files.
User avatar
Andrew
Retro Basketball Gamer
Administrator
 
Posts: 115123
Joined: Thu Aug 22, 2002 8:51 pm
Location: Australia

Postby mp3 on Sat Aug 21, 2004 6:49 pm

Buy both !!

pc version is 10 times better tho
Youtube - mp3 Basketball Gaming
User avatar
mp3
 
Posts: 5326
Joined: Mon Feb 24, 2003 12:45 am

Postby JasonLin on Mon Aug 23, 2004 6:23 am

It depends on how good your PC is. If you have a powerful P4 3G cpu and graphic card like Geforce FX 5900, you should get the PC version because you get much much better graphic and loads of patches to make the game even better. If you only have a Pentium3 PC you should definitely go with PS2 version.

I have a great PC and a PS2, i will get LIVE 05 for PC and ESPN NBA 2K5 for PS2, it's going to be a fun year.~~~ :P
User avatar
JasonLin
 
Posts: 139
Joined: Mon Nov 11, 2002 8:01 pm
Location: East Sussex, UK

Postby . on Mon Aug 23, 2004 6:40 am

PC
.
 
Posts: 3706
Joined: Mon Nov 11, 2002 10:02 pm

Postby [Q] on Mon Aug 23, 2004 7:15 am

you actually had to think about it? :roll:
PC baby (Y)
Image
User avatar
[Q]
NBA Live 18 Advocate
NLSC Team Member
 
Posts: 14396
Joined: Tue Oct 01, 2002 8:20 am
Location: Westside, the best side

Postby Sauru on Mon Aug 23, 2004 8:00 am

no console can compare to a pc so the choice is always clear. only reason imo to buy console games is if they are console exclusive or come out on the console many monthes earlier(gta anyone?).
User avatar
Sauru
 
Posts: 7726
Joined: Sat Sep 06, 2003 11:01 am

Postby GordonBulls on Mon Aug 23, 2004 9:03 am

PS2!!!
GordonBulls
 
Posts: 224
Joined: Thu Jul 01, 2004 12:45 am
Location: Nashville,TN

Postby Hotshot on Mon Aug 23, 2004 10:36 am

The grapics usually looks much crisper and more polished on the PC version. Plus you get to download and install all sorts of patches... that in itself adds a little replay value to the game. And if you have a dual analog gamepad, you can have the best of both worlds :)
User avatar
Hotshot
 
Posts: 703
Joined: Wed Apr 02, 2003 8:25 pm
Location: Bangalore, India

Postby Sauru on Mon Aug 23, 2004 11:29 am

alt tab for the win
User avatar
Sauru
 
Posts: 7726
Joined: Sat Sep 06, 2003 11:01 am

Postby Bird123 on Mon Aug 23, 2004 1:00 pm

The last Live I played for PC was 2001. Sucked. The last of any Live I played was 2002 for PS2, sucked. The last Live game that I liked was 2000 for PC. I was forever converted into a 2K fan...........until I just recently played Live 2004 on the PC.

I just got an ATI Radeon 9800 Pro to play Doom3 (X800 is too damn expensive) and copped Live 04 for the hell of it, maybe hoping for a little bit of nostalgia of the 99 and 2000 games I loved so much. I have to say that I'm loving this game. It runs ultra smooth even at the highest resolution on my PC (looks 10x sharper than PS2), and with all of these patches, I'm in love.

So having this game for about a week, I'm having so much fun, and am constantly checking the sites for updates on 2005. SO.......if you ghot the specs, get it for PC!!!! I'm back Live, sorry I left ya, but you sucked from 2001-2003, lol.
Bird123
 
Posts: 66
Joined: Sat Aug 21, 2004 10:05 am

Postby sebassss on Wed Aug 25, 2004 4:09 am

thanks, PC it is
User avatar
sebassss
 
Posts: 44
Joined: Thu Aug 19, 2004 1:50 am

Postby Snilrch on Wed Aug 25, 2004 4:06 pm

i'm gettin' both
User avatar
Snilrch
 
Posts: 211
Joined: Sun Jul 13, 2003 1:01 pm
Location: tx

Postby hmm on Wed Aug 25, 2004 8:19 pm

...........................
Last edited by hmm on Tue Jun 02, 2009 3:34 am, edited 1 time in total.
hmm
 
Posts: 2058
Joined: Mon Dec 08, 2003 2:06 am

Postby Sauru on Thu Aug 26, 2004 1:05 am

i vote you upgrade your comp chair next.
User avatar
Sauru
 
Posts: 7726
Joined: Sat Sep 06, 2003 11:01 am

Postby John WB on Thu Aug 26, 2004 3:52 pm

PC by far.
User avatar
John WB
 
Posts: 2092
Joined: Thu Jun 24, 2004 11:29 am
Location: New York City

PC for certain

Postby busta_cap on Fri Aug 27, 2004 12:49 pm

The ps2 can't compete with even mid-level PCs as far as gaming goes. I don't even have a bleeding edge machine and I have no problems playing any game on the PC at jawdropping speed levels, and the graphics are all MUCH better than the PS2 or Xbox.

Specs:
Athlon 64 3000+ (no overclock neccessary yet)
Chaintech VNF250 mboard
1gb Corsair Value Select ram
128mb Leadtek Geforce 6800 8x agp video board
250gb Maxtor UATA133, 8mb cache
480w Aspire PSU w/blue leds
8x Memorex DVD+/-R RW (40x cd read/write rate)
Aopen 52x CDRW drive
Thermaltake Tsunami case, black with side window
Logitech MX700 Cordless duo mouse & kb
Logitech Wingman Cordless
House brand 70w 5.1 speakers

Sure, I spent over $1k building this system, but as far as games go, it's a bloodletting machine, and I can do anything else I need, from biz apps to 3d Bryce/Poser rendering to everything else a computer should do.

A PS2 is a specialized and limited machine. A basic NBA Live2k5 capable machine (much better/faster than any PS2) should cost less than $400 to anyone (and $300 to anyone with a little tech saavy).

Go PC, young man!
Athlon 64 3500+ | MSI KN8 Neo4 Platinum mb | 2gb Corsair VS PC3200 | BFG Geforce 6800GT OC | WD 160gb SATA | Maxtor 250gb SATA | Seagate External 320gb | Plextor PX-740A 16x DVD+/-RW | Sony CRX-320E DVD/CDRW 52x | Thermaltake Tsunami Dream Case | Aspire 520w dual fan PSU | Logitech Z640 5.1 speakers (72w) | Logitech Cordless MX kb | Logitech MX-518 mouse | Logitech Dual Action controller | Logitech Extreme 3D Pro stick | Logitech Premium Stereo Headset
busta_cap
 
Posts: 40
Joined: Fri Nov 22, 2002 7:38 am
Location: Clutch City, Texas (aka Houston)

Postby cocobee on Fri Aug 27, 2004 1:07 pm

(Y) That's a nice system bro. i recently updated my system as well: Everything has been ordered --my buddy is gonna put it together when I go home next weekend.

*AMD Athlon 64 3200+, 512k L2 Cache
*MSI nForce3 250 Chipset Motherboard for AMD Athlon 64 Socket 754 CPU, Model "K8N Neo Platinum" (MS-7030)
*Corsair Value Select 184 Pin 512MB DDR PC-3200
*ATI RADEON X800 PRO 256MB DDR AGP Graphics Card
*8XDVD Burner


I can't wait to try Madden 2005 and Live 2005 on this rig. I've been debating about the video card for awhile, but I decided to go with the ATI card in the end. IMHO, ATI makes Direct 3D games look a lot better than Nvdia. But, if I'm not happy with it--I have 30 days to return it to best buy and i'll get the BFG Geforce 6800 GT OC.

By the way, the best version will be the PC!
Image
User avatar
cocobee
America's Team
 
Posts: 3000
Joined: Mon Sep 23, 2002 3:46 pm
Location: in the coochie...

Postby toughthug on Fri Aug 27, 2004 2:30 pm

XBOX because it has the realist graphics out of all the system.
toughthug
 
Posts: 31
Joined: Thu Aug 19, 2004 3:25 pm

Postby cocobee on Fri Aug 27, 2004 2:58 pm

toughthug wrote:XBOX because it has the realist graphics out of all the system.


PS2 < XBOX < PC.

if you don't understand that analogy, try this:

1.PC
2.XBox
3.PS2
Image
User avatar
cocobee
America's Team
 
Posts: 3000
Joined: Mon Sep 23, 2002 3:46 pm
Location: in the coochie...

Postby John-John Joe on Fri Aug 27, 2004 4:42 pm

Sauru wrote:i vote you upgrade your comp chair next.


:lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:

Damn, that was funny. Anyway, I think it depends on what kind of gamer you are. Common sense would probably tell us that PC is the way to go. Better graphics and patches, patches, patches galore make it a good choice..........

But what if you're a gamer who like playing with friends? Every year my friends and I play an NBA Live tournament. We create our own teams, have a draft, and a 50 game season that leads to the NBA Finals where we determine the champ. It's hard to imagine 3-8 dudes all crowded around my monitor........

Also, what do you prefer? I'm a console guy through and through (XBox), though, seeing the almost endless replay value of the PC version through patches makes me think about changing religions. It all depends on what you want out of NBA Live and how and where you play it. Do you play more 1 player than multi player? Etc. etc. etc..........
User avatar
John-John Joe
 
Posts: 855
Joined: Mon Aug 09, 2004 11:11 am

Postby Bl@ck_Thorne on Sat Aug 28, 2004 1:52 pm

PC all the way no one can compete with the PC
User avatar
Bl@ck_Thorne
 
Posts: 596
Joined: Wed Nov 13, 2002 9:18 am
Location: Phillipines

Postby Jay-Peso on Sat Aug 28, 2004 1:54 pm

I picked PS2 because I will start out with PS2 and sooner or later buy the PC version if I got enough money.
Image
What you know bout that?
User avatar
Jay-Peso
 
Posts: 1704
Joined: Sat Nov 01, 2003 7:46 am
Location: United States


Return to NBA Live 2005

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 4 guests