slimm44 wrote:Dee4Three wrote:First, I'd like to say AMAZING work on this mod. Thank you for all the hard work. Pros and cons I have found.
Pros:
+ The courts used in each season mod and the final Ultimate Roster mod are awesome
+ The menu graphics/art, so well done. it really makes this mod unique
+ Most of the cyberfaces in here are ones that I would choose, great choices.
+ The dornas and just the arenas in general are mind boggling, I can't get over the quality
+ The jerseys that ARE used, are great. I actually like the darker purple for the Lakers jerseys.
Cons:
- I am sure this is being worked on, but alternate jerseys are missing for a lot of the teams, it would be nice to have atleast one alternate for say, the 07-08 Celtics (the black trim). I use the Final ultimate roster mostly, so this is where I am getting a lot of this from.
- Shooting forms are WAY off on many of the players. And I mean not even close. Is this still something that is being worked on? All of the players seemed to have a QUICK release as well in edit players
- issues with the names of a couple of the teams in the Final Ultimate Roster. Example, two teams say -01-00 instead of '00-'01.
- Certain teams in the final ultimate roster don't make sense, and some are missing. For example, the 04-05 pistons are in it instead of the champion 03-04 Pistons? The 87-88 Pistons are in it instead of one of the championship 88-89 or 89-90 Pistons? The 89-90 Blazers with ALL of the players at their best (Kersey/Duckworth/Porter has great years) should replace 90-91 Blazers, or be in there with them. It's missing the 05-06 Nets and the 96-97 Rockets. I also think you could include pre 84 teams, like the 70-71 Bucks, 64-65 Celtics, 76-77 76ers etc. I just feel like this overall roster is limited. Now, I can put teams in using REDMC, which is fine, but the pre 84 teams I would have to copy over from the UBR (which again, is fine). Another team that should get some consideration is the 01-02 Mavericks or the 03-04 Mavericks, no younger Dirk/Nash teams.
Overall.... just awesome. Thank you for all the hard work!
In regards to teams in Ultra, we picked them based off of wins/losses (like Sko said) but I also heavily pushed for teams based on the "versions" their stars had. Instead of looking at winning a ring, I looked at teams that had the best players at the best part of their careers. We thought choosing teams in this manner would give the user the best overall team in terms of player ratings. If you wanted to look through ULTRA and give specific examples of teams that are in versus teams you feel should be in, I can explain, via ratings, why we chose the teams we did.
If you do, please put them in the following format for ease of response:
In - 95-96 Bulls Should be in - 96-97 Bulls
oh i forgot about versions, yes youre right S, i knew there is one more reason
Looking at the real life pictures from the 1997 All-Star Game, should the '97 All-Stars have long shorts as opposed to the shorter shorts?
(click to zoom pic)
BTW, why NBA logo on shorts is too long?
