Thu Aug 14, 2014 5:18 am
Thu Aug 14, 2014 5:18 am
Thu Aug 14, 2014 5:19 am
TheBlackNerdyGamer wrote:[ Image ]
TBM wrote:So much negativity.
crazy_me_87 wrote:I see it that way... we are all very passionate about NBA 2k and our PCs...and everybody is entitled to that..it got too heated not without my doing... for that im sorry... and you are completly right... lets move on.. for my part all is forgiven and forgotten.. im the last one to hold grudges!
Thu Aug 14, 2014 5:21 am
Thu Aug 14, 2014 5:24 am
formyhunny wrote:NBA 2k NG coming to PC and shit still getting heated.![]()
Thu Aug 14, 2014 5:25 am
Thu Aug 14, 2014 5:28 am
Thu Aug 14, 2014 5:34 am
Thu Aug 14, 2014 5:36 am
velvet bliss wrote:[ Image ]
tsiakalos13 wrote:so I would appreciate if anyone would answer.
*(Specs)
Pentium Dual CPU E2220 @ 2.40 GHz
GeForce 8600
2 GB RAM
Thu Aug 14, 2014 5:37 am
velvet bliss wrote:[ Image ]
Thu Aug 14, 2014 5:38 am
xKrNMBoYx wrote:YES FINALLY WE CAN ALL BE NLSC BUDDIES!!!!
Thanks for the clarifications crazy_me_87. There is nothing wrong or abnormal of your RAM, OS, or Resolution. I for one still game on 1280 x 1024 on my FM2+ PC and my AM3 PC and had a AM2 Athlon X2 6400+ until the 6-Core Phenom's were released.. I will occasionally game on my 1080P TV when I play 2K13/14 with someone who comes over. Because of the lower resolution I can play on High settings in most games with my HD 7850 OC and HD 4850.
Thu Aug 14, 2014 5:44 am
xKrNMBoYx wrote:@rashbanor
The general rule is not to argue on the internet because you end up looking stupid. We kind of dug our own grave in a way.
Thu Aug 14, 2014 5:50 am
crazy_me_87 wrote:
well it kinda feels "abnormal" with all the 1080p around![]()
just a week ago some kid looked at me "what you game at 1280x1024, i didnt even know that existed"im getting old..
i remember 800x600 very clearly![]()
lets get back on topic shall we?
if i would summarize all info we gathered during our discussion my most educated guess for a playable(so somewhere around medium settings) NBA2k15 would be:
At least an old but sturdy Quadcore like mine,wait!..IF you play on "lower" resolutions
but a i5 or I7 from the last 2 years would mean more safety
4gb Ram better 6 or even better 8gb
a GPU at least on par with Ps4 so Radeon 7790 to 7850/R7 270 or a Nvidia ,750ti,660,670,760
would that be an advise you would agree with? also feel very free to add/correct it
im just trying to un-confuse this Thread and give some advise as good as we can allthough its clear that we know nothing for sure until the requierments are released
RashbaNor wrote:But what's the point of discussions when you shouldn't argue?
Thu Aug 14, 2014 5:50 am
Thu Aug 14, 2014 5:56 am
Thu Aug 14, 2014 5:59 am
xKrNMBoYx wrote:crazy_me_87 wrote:
well it kinda feels "abnormal" with all the 1080p around![]()
just a week ago some kid looked at me "what you game at 1280x1024, i didnt even know that existed"im getting old..
i remember 800x600 very clearly![]()
lets get back on topic shall we?
if i would summarize all info we gathered during our discussion my most educated guess for a playable(so somewhere around medium settings) NBA2k15 would be:
At least an old but sturdy Quadcore like mine,wait!..IF you play on "lower" resolutions
but a i5 or I7 from the last 2 years would mean more safety
4gb Ram better 6 or even better 8gb
a GPU at least on par with Ps4 so Radeon 7790 to 7850/R7 270 or a Nvidia ,750ti,660,670,760
would that be an advise you would agree with? also feel very free to add/correct it
im just trying to un-confuse this Thread and give some advise as good as we can allthough its clear that we know nothing for sure until the requierments are released
Yes I know. I began building my own PCs after 1080P was released. So all the monitors I have at home were 1024 x 768 or 1280 x 1024 resolutions. I use two 1280 x 1024 on each setup. Wish I could eyefinity with them but they are all VGA.
Like you said a Quad-Core is a safe bet for CPU. Intel's Core 2 Quad are still good CPUs for most games. It's just that they suffer in some of the newer games. The only reason I would not recommend a person to buy a Core 2 Quad now is the high price and low availability of DDR2 RAM. An AMD Dual-Core is a no no. AMD Quad-Cores CPU's will be okay, Quad-Core APU's maybe. In general I would suggest 6-Cores or more for AMD. For Intel all Quad-Core and up should be fine in most cases. If the game does not utilize more than 2-Cores (efficiently) an Intel i3 may be good enough for gaming.
I honestly would start recommending 8GB of RAM from now on for gaming. Especially when they become cheaper when DDR4 comes out. I bought 16GB of DDR3 RAM for ~$50 a few years ago. I would have had to pay $200+ for DDR2 versions at the same time.
Now the sweet GPU. I kind of agree with you. For AMD a 7790 will probably be the cheapest GPU you'd want to buy to play at higher than minimum settings. For Nvidia the GTX 750/Ti. The general conclusion is that a Quad-Core and a GPU better than a 7790 (X1) or a GTX 750 will at least allow you to play minimum settings smoothly. Probably a bit higher. I don't want to give a strong recommendation as I could be completely wrong when the game is released.
Thu Aug 14, 2014 6:00 am
macebig wrote:Just to help a little bit.I own Moto gp14 on pc which is a port from the ps4 and it states as recommended an i7 and a gtx780.I play it on a fx6300 and r9 270x 2gb at 60 fps with vsync on 1080p.But the game doesnt have antialiasing from factory so it might help a bit.
crazy_me_87 wrote:oh you are absolutly right i wouldnt recommend buying a Quadcore NOW.. there is much better for the money now... but if you already have one like me the CPU is no immedeate reason to panic![]()
yah youre right.. its probably best to just say "go for 8gb Ram" especcially since Ram is not that expensive so an upgrade from 4 to 8 gb will cost you maybe 20-30$
yeah i think we need to make that totally clear... even though we seem like "the Knowledgeables" here, all we can do is guess
it could be more demanding but if they optimize well it could be less demanding
but nice to see we have a basic advise for people who are absolutly unsure what to buy allthough the best advise would propably be "wait with upgrading till they release the requierements"
Thu Aug 14, 2014 6:05 am
macebig wrote:Just to help a little bit.I own Moto gp14 on pc which is a port from the ps4 and it states as recommended an i7 and a gtx780.I play it on a fx6300 and r9 270x 2gb at 60 fps with vsync on 1080p.But the game doesnt have antialiasing from factory so it might help a bit.
Thu Aug 14, 2014 6:09 am
Thu Aug 14, 2014 6:24 am
RashbaNor wrote:velvet bliss wrote:[ Image ]
And you post it because...
...it's about you?
...you haven't read the whole topic and just decided to throw a senseless meme?
...you've read the whole topic but couldn't understand it and decided to throw a senseless meme anyways?
...you'd do anything to raise your post count?
Thu Aug 14, 2014 6:30 am
Thu Aug 14, 2014 6:32 am
velvet bliss wrote:RashbaNor wrote:velvet bliss wrote:[ Image ]
And you post it because...
...it's about you?
...you haven't read the whole topic and just decided to throw a senseless meme?
...you've read the whole topic but couldn't understand it and decided to throw a senseless meme anyways?
...you'd do anything to raise your post count?
Nope. It's about you guys and your retarded pissing contest on pc specs.
Nope. Done read it, the image is very appropriate to what's been going on in this thread.
Read just fine thank you.
Nope. I like how people are obsessed with post count to notice it even if it has nothing to do with anything.
Mad-Raiiden wrote:Can we just talk of how happy we are to get the Next-gen version?
Come on, we've be hoping for this since last year !
Thu Aug 14, 2014 6:42 am
I honestly would start recommending 8GB of RAM from now on for gaming, especially if they run a 64bit OS.[/b] I believe DDR4 is available to the public now. DDR3 is bound to drop in price a little right? I bought 16GB of DDR3 RAM for ~$50 a few years ago. I would have had to pay $200+ for DDR2 versions at the same time.
Thu Aug 14, 2014 6:51 am
columbusbobby23 wrote:I honestly would start recommending 8GB of RAM from now on for gaming, especially if they run a 64bit OS.[/b] I believe DDR4 is available to the public now. DDR3 is bound to drop in price a little right? I bought 16GB of DDR3 RAM for ~$50 a few years ago. I would have had to pay $200+ for DDR2 versions at the same time.
16GB of DDR3 RAM a few years ago for $50? Is this a typo? If not I would like to know where you shop.
Thu Aug 14, 2014 7:06 am
velvet bliss wrote:Nope. It's about you guys and your retarded pissing contest on pc specs.
Nope. Done read it, the image is very appropriate to what's been going on in this thread.
Read just fine thank you.
Nope. I like how people are obsessed with post count to notice it even if it has nothing to do with anything.