follow3 wrote:King Mellow wrote:2k sucks on their rating system. Gotta say NBA Live's player ratings is better.
Where I can check out nba live 14 ratings?
hiteshom wrote:follow3 wrote:King Mellow wrote:2k sucks on their rating system. Gotta say NBA Live's player ratings is better.
Where I can check out nba live 14 ratings?
Can't or will likely never be able to, even after the game is out... because NBA Live sounds like they took player ratings out of the game, and replaced them with a stats kind of system
Andrew wrote:Revealed Player Ratings
LeBron James: 99
KingDarealHD wrote:Why are people saying that some players rating should be 2 - 3 points down or up. Thats pathetic. Does anyone know how ratings work. I guess not. Certain attributes makes the players ratings go up or down more than others. Also the ratings arent set they are going to change through the season. Plus you wont even notice the couple of points difference. Everyone should know that by now.
Spree#8 wrote:KingDarealHD wrote:Why are people saying that some players rating should be 2 - 3 points down or up. Thats pathetic. Does anyone know how ratings work. I guess not. Certain attributes makes the players ratings go up or down more than others. Also the ratings arent set they are going to change through the season. Plus you wont even notice the couple of points difference. Everyone should know that by now.
+1
You all do realize that the overall rating has no impact on the gameplay, right? The only purpose it serves is to give the game a single, simple measure of a player's ability, which is obviously a part of his market value. Other than that, it's all about the attributes. The overall rating is just an imperfect calculation of all the attributes to one number and it depends on position, too.
The overall rating doesn't represent a player all that well. Dirk Nowitzki is a perfect example of that: his overall rating would usually be a little low (and by low, I mean low-mid 80s), but he played exactly like he should have - a lethal scorer, mediocre defender and decent defensive rebounder. The overall for a power forward doesn't give outside shooting too much attention (whether that's correct or not is another story) and of course everybody starts bitching about Dirk's low overall. Next thing you know, 2K bumps up his overall in their roster updates by overrating his defense, rebounding, etc. so that all those dipshits would just shut the hell up already.
Attributes is what you should be looking at because that's what matters. Until you see those, you have no way of knowing if a player is rated accurately or not. Well, unless they gave Evan Turner a 95 overall - then you already know something's wrong. But all I see is "this guy has a 75 overall? that's stupid, he should have 74!"... are you fucking serious?
I know that 2K's rosters always have flaws (some of Thad Young's defensive attributes are way too low, for instance), but until you get your hands on the game, look at the attributes and point out which ones are wrong, you're just making yourself look dumb by complaining about the overall being a point or two too high, especially when we have no idea what the exact overall rating formula is for each position.
chicagoRAW wrote:I just want to know what the formula is for the ratings.
Spree#8 wrote:KingDarealHD wrote:Why are people saying that some players rating should be 2 - 3 points down or up. Thats pathetic. Does anyone know how ratings work. I guess not. Certain attributes makes the players ratings go up or down more than others. Also the ratings arent set they are going to change through the season. Plus you wont even notice the couple of points difference. Everyone should know that by now.
+1
You all do realize that the overall rating has no impact on the gameplay, right? The only purpose it serves is to give the game a single, simple measure of a player's ability, which is obviously a part of his market value. Other than that, it's all about the attributes. The overall rating is just an imperfect calculation of all the attributes to one number and it depends on position, too.
The overall rating doesn't represent a player all that well. Dirk Nowitzki is a perfect example of that: his overall rating would usually be a little low (and by low, I mean low-mid 80s), but he played exactly like he should have - a lethal scorer, mediocre defender and decent defensive rebounder. The overall for a power forward doesn't give outside shooting too much attention (whether that's correct or not is another story) and of course everybody starts bitching about Dirk's low overall. Next thing you know, 2K bumps up his overall in their roster updates by overrating his defense, rebounding, etc. so that all those dipshits would just shut the hell up already.
Attributes is what you should be looking at because that's what matters. Until you see those, you have no way of knowing if a player is rated accurately or not. Well, unless they gave Evan Turner a 95 overall - then you already know something's wrong. But all I see is "this guy has a 75 overall? that's stupid, he should have 74!"... are you fucking serious?
I know that 2K's rosters always have flaws (some of Thad Young's defensive attributes are way too low, for instance), but until you get your hands on the game, look at the attributes and point out which ones are wrong, you're just making yourself look dumb by complaining about the overall being a point or two too high, especially when we have no idea what the exact overall rating formula is for each position.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests