Lakers Thread

:lol: At not needing CP3. The guy is so unselfish and such a brilliant passer...how can you NOT need him?

It's simple : CP3 needs the ball to work. Kobe needs the ball to work. In Odom we lose the only player of the bench who can basically do it all for us. In Gasol we lose a player who was actually our best player in the beginning of the season. Again, if he hadn't played so much ball these years and rested a bit - we might have given Mavs some trouble, at least. Curse you, Bynum! XD

Not knowing who the coach of the team

It's tough to adjust to a coach like Phil Jax leaving, especially since he's been around for such a long time

Thank God the trade din't go thru!


At the same time, fuck the NBA for fuckin our team over in so many ways. Odom won't come to the training camp, Gasol is hurt, no CP3 or D12, we been DP-ed. If u don't want the trade to happen - say it before anything actually goes down!

Last edited by kAmilli LakeShow on Sat Dec 10, 2011 7:08 am, edited 1 time in total.

It's simple : CP3 needs the ball to work. Kobe needs the ball to work.

You realize only Thomas, Magic & Paul are PG's to average 19 points, 9 assists & 2 steals, right? If you can get Chris Paul...you get Chris Paul.

It's simple : CP3 needs the ball to work. Kobe needs the ball to work.

You realize only Thomas, Magic & Paul are PG's to average 19 points, 9 assists & 2 steals, right? If you can get Chris Paul...you get Chris Paul.

I do, but Lakers, if they gonna play some kind of triangle offense, completely don't need a scoring/high assisting PG. That's one of the things that made triangle offense successful. If not, then maybe, but still, we lose all our advantages - depth, size, and also, who is gonna get those assists? Kobe will get like 2 of those, other 7 will go nowhere without Pau and Odom. Drew breaks down every season, so what gonna happen if we lose Pau? Who's gonna rebound for this team? That's one thing Paul won't bring, just think about it, we gain a couple of assists, lose both POINTS and REBOUNDS in that trade, plus defensive and offensive size. That right there - recipe for disaster

I don't know why I'm even bothering with this reply but fine, here goes.

What triangle offense? There is no triangle offense. "Those assists"? You realize this guy averaged 9 assists a game with Okafor/Landry, right? Now he's got the opportunity to be passing to Bryant & to run pick & roll's with Bynum, you think he'll average around 7? You don't seem to get that Chris Paul could go down as one of the best PG's to ever play the game. Ever.

You build around a guy like that. You build around a guy like Howard more, but when you've got the opportunity to land a guy like that for 2 forwards above 30, despite their awesomeness and my mad love for Odom & Gasol...you make that trade. Maybe you suck for a year or two...but that guy will lure FA's to the Lakers for years to come.

You're thinking about right now, the Lakers should be thinking about the future.

You're thinking about right now, the Lakers should be thinking about the future.

^ this

lol at Paul scoring much. He had too. Outside of David West in that Hornets team, none was capable of creating his own shot or effective at it (Ariza lol)
Paul's usage% and ast% is pretty similar to PGs that 'pass more' like Nash or Magic Johnson.
I also don't get the criticism of him needing to dominate the ball to be effective. Chris Paul has to dominate the ball with the Hornets because most of his teammates aren't that good.
It's not like Chris Paul plays like Marbury. Marbury can only play one 'mode'. Starbury is either in a scoring mode or passing mode, no in-between to take advantage of what the defense was giving him. Paul either scores or pass depending on what the defense has. Unlike Marbury too, Chris Pauls like to pass, pass, pass, and pass some more if the opportunity arises. If not then he scores.

There is the issue of who the Lakers run the offense through with Kobe and Paul in the backcourt though. Paul is the obvious choice, but Kobe's not really an off-the-ball player either. He certainly can be effective that way but he likes to have the ball in his hands, either creating for himself or settings things up for a teammate. Put them together and you've possibly got a situation where you're either taking Kobe out of his style of play or relegating Chris Paul to a Derek Fisher-type role. I'm not sure either of those scenarios work out particularly well.

There is the issue of who the Lakers run the offense through with Kobe and Paul in the backcourt though. Paul is the obvious choice, but Kobe's not really an off-the-ball player either. He certainly can be effective that way but he likes to have the ball in his hands, either creating for himself or settings things up for a teammate. Put them together and you've possibly got a situation where you're either taking Kobe out of his style of play or relegating Chris Paul to a Derek Fisher-type role. I'm not sure either of those scenarios work out particularly well.

People had the same reservations about LeBron and Wade, both players that like the ball in their hands. Look where they ended up and their $tats weren't particularly bad either.
Another example of ball dominating players, Carmelo and AI made it work (at least in the regular season). Kobe and Paul, two players that are definitely better than those two can certainly make it work (at least in the regular season).

There is the issue of who the Lakers run the offense through with Kobe and Paul in the backcourt though. Paul is the obvious choice, but Kobe's not really an off-the-ball player either. He certainly can be effective that way but he likes to have the ball in his hands, either creating for himself or settings things up for a teammate. Put them together and you've possibly got a situation where you're either taking Kobe out of his style of play or relegating Chris Paul to a Derek Fisher-type role. I'm not sure either of those scenarios work out particularly well.

People had the same reservations about LeBron and Wade, both players that like the ball in their hands. Look where they ended up and their $tats weren't particularly bad either.
Another example of ball dominating players, Carmelo and AI made it work (at least in the regular season). Kobe and Paul, two players that are definitely better than those two can certainly make it work (at least in the regular season).

That's true.But Andrew is right.A Star PG would mess up kobe's game.Kobe needs a player like fisher-farmar-brooks.blake.etc. to have the game he's having.

I don't know why I'm even bothering with this reply but fine, here goes.

What triangle offense? There is no triangle offense. "Those assists"? You realize this guy averaged 9 assists a game with Okafor/Landry, right? Now he's got the opportunity to be passing to Bryant & to run pick & roll's with Bynum, you think he'll average around 7? You don't seem to get that Chris Paul could go down as one of the best PG's to ever play the game. Ever.

You build around a guy like that. You build around a guy like Howard more, but when you've got the opportunity to land a guy like that for 2 forwards above 30, despite their awesomeness and my mad love for Odom & Gasol...you make that trade. Maybe you suck for a year or two...but that guy will lure FA's to the Lakers for years to come.

You're thinking about right now, the Lakers should be thinking about the future.

Pick n rolls with Bynum? Haha, yeah, Bynum is a really good pick and LOL player XD I'm thinking about right now because i REALLY think we can still win in the next 3 years without this deal. Last year we were tired, banged-up, our 2nd best player was emotionally not there. We need upgrade at the 3 position, maybe sacrifice Bynum or Odom to get it, that would be fine by me. Chris paul deal is just asking us to give up everything we had for the last 5 SUCCESSFUL years - our size, rebounding and cohesiveness.

Plus, why no one sees it? There is PLENTY of good point guards around NBA. We don't absolutely have to go after Paul RIGHT NOW. We are rushing things, in my opinion.

NBA.com says the deal still might go thru, but repackaged.We'll see

What Stern did in the first place totally didn't make sense at all. Fuck owners like Dan Gilbert, whiny bitch ass who believes in slavery who's a forever loser team owner(He's only made Lebron's decision look like the best choice so far). Stern is pretty much on his knees sucking their cocks right now.

I don't really like the Lakers but like in Woj and Simmon's articles, this could have been one of those "Oh that's cool." kinda happening for this league. The Hornet's GM probably is the biggest victim here though. Stern confirmed his job as a puppet.

I don't know why I'm even bothering with this reply but fine, here goes.

What triangle offense? There is no triangle offense. "Those assists"? You realize this guy averaged 9 assists a game with Okafor/Landry, right? Now he's got the opportunity to be passing to Bryant & to run pick & roll's with Bynum, you think he'll average around 7? You don't seem to get that Chris Paul could go down as one of the best PG's to ever play the game. Ever.

You build around a guy like that. You build around a guy like Howard more, but when you've got the opportunity to land a guy like that for 2 forwards above 30, despite their awesomeness and my mad love for Odom & Gasol...you make that trade. Maybe you suck for a year or two...but that guy will lure FA's to the Lakers for years to come.

You're thinking about right now, the Lakers should be thinking about the future.

Pick n rolls with Bynum? Haha, yeah, Bynum is a really good pick and LOL player XD I'm thinking about right now because i REALLY think we can still win in the next 3 years without this deal. Last year we were tired, banged-up, our 2nd best player was emotionally not there. We need upgrade at the 3 position, maybe sacrifice Bynum or Odom to get it, that would be fine by me. Chris paul deal is just asking us to give up everything we had for the last 5 SUCCESSFUL years - our size, rebounding and cohesiveness.

Plus, why no one sees it? There is PLENTY of good point guards around NBA. We don't absolutely have to go after Paul RIGHT NOW. We are rushing things, in my opinion.

Nice mind.I like the way you're thinking of.. correct mind for LA Lakers.

That's true.But Andrew is right.A Star PG would mess up kobe's game.Kobe needs a player like fisher-farmar-brooks.blake.etc. to have the game he's having.

Proof or ban?

Chauncey Billups. Perfect fit RIGHT NOW for LA, plus soon to be free agent, we might even sign him for a vet. minimum! Passer, leader, 3-point shooter, good defender. And we don't give up ANYTHING!

Chauncey Billups. Perfect fit RIGHT NOW for LA, plus soon to be free agent, we might even sign him for a vet. minimum! Passer, leader, 3-point shooter, good defender. And we don't give up ANYTHING!

for sure..billups can fit for LA..

That's true.But Andrew is right.A Star PG would mess up kobe's game.Kobe needs a player like fisher-farmar-brooks.blake.etc. to have the game he's having.

Proof or ban?

Why ban?.That's my opinion.And proof is that paul wants the ball much,and score like kobe.

Is this Badger in training?

Why ban?.That's my opinion.And proof is that paul wants the ball much,and score like kobe.

Prove it.

Nope

Then shut up if you can't give out a reason.

Then shut up if you can't give out a reason.

Bassically i can give out a reason...i did already to other suggestion about this thread.and i am boring right now to tell again that things

You only said why the team (Lakers) would suck in the previous page. You haven't given out any reason why they would be bad teammates, except for agreeing with Andrew's post.

You're bored right now to tell things again? You sure as hell not bored to repeat things in other threads.

You only said why the team (Lakers) would suck in the previous page. You haven't given out any reason why they would be bad teammates, except for agreeing with Andrew's post.

You're bored right now to tell things again? You sure as hell not bored to repeat things in other threads.

ughh leave me alone

Paul deal re-subbmited! Would love to see that one approved. It would make Lakers even more fun to watch. This could very well be the best guard duo in league history. I mean you have Kobe, the 2nd best SG ever and Chris Paul who could very well be in TOP 5 (in his position) when it's all said and done. Make that happen Stern!