thx for the feedback and sorry guys

I know it's tough to get a big picture on trades since I've not done all the team overviews at the start of the season, partly because 1) it's a time sink and there's enough team-specific things to cover already in the off-season and sometimes you just wanna get started; so doing the previews before each "new" team we face helps space things out a bit; 2) by spacing it out I get to evaluate what's happened more thoroughly regarding rosters, off-season moves, expiring contracts etc.
Anyway, the thing with Chicago is that they picked up SG/SF Mike Miller (78 overall) from free agency last off-season and he still has 2 yrs remaining on contract:
7/30/10
Clippers sign B. Miller for 17.34M for 2 yrs
Clippers sign D. Wright for 5.15M for 1 yr
Bulls sign M. Miller for 31.88M for 3 yrs
behind him is Devin Brown (74 ovrl; currently starting in Miller's absence; 2 yrs remaining); this season Chicago signed Ronald 'Flip' Murray (73 ovrl, 6 yrs remaining) and Danny Green (67 ovrl, 4 yrs remaining); meanwhile the Bulls had Hakim Warrick (75 ovrl) leading a pair of low 70's youth at PF. They had Big Z for a season but he retired just this past off-season; and of course Noah's ark set sail for, well,
Golden territory

Cavs have David Lee (82) and last year's RotY Haywood Faust (76) who both have secondary position of PF; their new starter is Carl Landry (79) with J.J. Hickson (77) behind him. They could afford to move Jamison (82).
a few things I try to keep in mind regarding trades:
Re-Balancing. First I look for teams that are heavy at one position yet depleted in another (Cavs having many bigs and few guards for ex) which tends to happen in Live 06; teams can easily stack with point guards or forwards or centers over some seasons since the CPU drafts the best player available and doesn't consider team needs;
Expendables. If I spot a team with overflow in a certain position, I look to see who is the most expendable, which players the team might be building a future around, what position is missing/needed most, and which other team(s) fit best with complementary needs. Looking at the Cavs with Lee/Faust at center, Landry/Hickson at PF, Jamison, the oldest of the lot, became odd man out; Bulls needed a senior bigman and could sacrifice a guard;
Age, Contracts & Salaries. Pretty self explanatory; teams will be less likely to part with young promising talent than a past-prime, uber expensive has-been;
Conference. Generally I try to move players cross conference and not just to rivals ie., East to West and vice versa; but sometimes the above conditions still benefits both teams enough to matter so the deal still goes through
Anyway, just general guidelines I try to adhere to re: trades that might occur in Clutchworld

; of course crazy nonsensical trades do happen IRL and are part the fun/appeal of 'virtual' dynasties too
Side note: Martti, found a "3-pointers attempted" rating that I've made the below adjustments to; basically it's the likelihood of launching a 3 as opposed to normal field goal attempt:
Curry: no change (left at 25%)
Morrow: no change (left at 40%)
Carter, Azubuike, Wafer: +5% (was 20, now 25%)
Mason: +1% (was 39, now 40%)
nothing too radical; don't want my boys to sling 40+ treys a night... afterall, Nellie doesn't live here anymore
