NBA Finals: Lakers (1) vs Celtics (4)

Like real basketball, as well as basketball video games? Talk about the NBA, NCAA, and other professional and amateur basketball leagues here.

Who will win the 2010 NBA Championship?

Lakers in 4
2
4%
Lakers in 5
2
4%
Lakers in 6
9
17%
Lakers in 7
7
13%
Celtics in 4
1
2%
Celtics in 5
2
4%
Celtics in 6
14
26%
Celtics in 7
2
4%
Should've been Suns/Magic
9
17%
Should've been Lakers/Cavs
1
2%
The Lakers will win because they are the Lakers. Ask Magic.
1
2%
Boston wins because Paul Pierce will play in a wheelchair again.
1
2%
Nate Robinson is as close of a leprachaun you will find in the NBA.
1
2%
I want to see Kobe vs KG in a Snarl-Off
2
4%
 
Total votes : 54

Re: NBA Finals: Lakers (1) vs Celtics (4)

Postby shadowgrin on Mon Jun 14, 2010 3:10 pm

The X wrote:If it wasn't for Artest the Suns would be in Finals now, so Lakers fans can't be completely on him (N)

We're talking about Lakers fans here. Only a few of them make sense.
Artest saved the Suns series for us! Yey. He's losing the Finals for us! Boo. :roll:
HE'S USING HYPNOSIS!
JaoSming2KTV wrote:its fun on a bun
shadowgrin
Doesn't negotiate with terrorists. NLSC's Jefferson Davis. The Questioneer
 
Posts: 23229
Joined: Thu Dec 12, 2002 6:21 am
Location: In your mind

Re: NBA Finals: Lakers (1) vs Celtics (4)

Postby Lamrock on Mon Jun 14, 2010 3:11 pm

To be fair, if not for Artest constantly bricking threes, the Lakers wouldn't have blown that game 5 lead in the first place...
Image
User avatar
Lamrock
 
Posts: 10936
Joined: Tue Jul 05, 2005 4:02 pm
Location: Washington State

Re: NBA Finals: Lakers (1) vs Celtics (4)

Postby benji on Mon Jun 14, 2010 4:30 pm

Here's a question, why wasn't Odom the inbound guy and Artest a screener on that play with ten seconds to go?

I mean other than the obvious fact Jackson gave up and just said "inbound it to Kobe" since nobody was even in motion except Kobe. (Who wound up going the wrong way around the faux-screen to jack up yet another flailing "I TOTALLY GOT FOULED BRO" three.)

I don't think I can hate these two teams (and their fans) and this series more. The fact that they both seem unable to play basketball or do anything reasonable is what keeps bringing me back. More Pierce and Kobe isolations that result in shitty jump shots! More nobody being able to rebound! More passes that are so shitty they get nowhere near the intended person! More dribbling off the leg or into people hoping you get a call!

This series couldn't be more different than the 2008 one despite having mostly the same players.

If there's one way to sum up this series, it's like watching the Pistons play the Pistons.

Also, is it possible to NOT award a Finals MVP?
User avatar
benji
 
Posts: 14545
Joined: Sat Nov 16, 2002 9:09 am

Re: NBA Finals: Lakers (1) vs Celtics (4)

Postby NovU on Mon Jun 14, 2010 5:30 pm

Great team effort. I like how each different player stepped up in Boston's 3 wins in this series, Paul Pierce being the last one to provide.

Lakers however is disappointing. Could be blamed on Bynum's hp, but still Lakers were considered to be upgraded while Boston's big 3 aged from 2 years ago.

2 more games to go, and I'm guessing this series is hitting game 7 though.
THX TO DOPE-JAO FOR THE SPECIAL SIG! <3
Image
Enjoy! <3 Jao
User avatar
NovU
Crap, what am I going to brag about now?
 
Posts: 11325
Joined: Tue Jun 05, 2007 6:50 pm

Re: NBA Finals: Lakers (1) vs Celtics (4)

Postby shadowgrin on Mon Jun 14, 2010 5:54 pm

Even if Bynum was a non-factor the Lakers still got more offensive rebounds than the Celtics (16-7), got more free throw attempts (26-13) despite both teams almost having the same amount of fouls (22-23). The Lakers even shot better behind the arc (37% - 27%). The FTAs and three-point shooting by the Lakers offset the points in the paint by of the Celtics (32-46) imo.

Bynum shouldn't be made as an excuse for the Lakers (even though he played 32 mins. doing nothing) because the entire team sucked in game 5 outside of Kobe Bryant. Their offense got stagnant around Kobe as shown by their 12 assists as a team.
HE'S USING HYPNOSIS!
JaoSming2KTV wrote:its fun on a bun
shadowgrin
Doesn't negotiate with terrorists. NLSC's Jefferson Davis. The Questioneer
 
Posts: 23229
Joined: Thu Dec 12, 2002 6:21 am
Location: In your mind

Re: NBA Finals: Lakers (1) vs Celtics (4)

Postby benji on Mon Jun 14, 2010 6:28 pm

40% to 56%. That's all that mattered. The Lakers were better or equal (for the bulk of the game were better) at everything else. They just weren't making shots (because a lot of them were long jumpers under duress for no reason) or defending shots (because help defense is for teams that don't hate each other) and that's what killed them.

:bowdown: Should have just let Kobe take every shot.
User avatar
benji
 
Posts: 14545
Joined: Sat Nov 16, 2002 9:09 am

Re: NBA Finals: Lakers (1) vs Celtics (4)

Postby koberulz on Mon Jun 14, 2010 7:48 pm

shadowgrin wrote:
The X wrote:If it wasn't for Artest the Suns would be in Finals now, so Lakers fans can't be completely on him (N)

We're talking about Lakers fans here. Only a few of them make sense.
Artest saved the Suns series for us! Yey. He's losing the Finals for us! Boo. :roll:

When did Artest win the Suns series?
User avatar
koberulz
Everything I say is false.
 
Posts: 4636
Joined: Sat Jun 04, 2005 11:46 pm
Location: Perth, Australia

Re: NBA Finals: Lakers (1) vs Celtics (4)

Postby NovU on Mon Jun 14, 2010 8:52 pm

Artest deserves to be critisized but it's more of a team fail, since the faciliators aren't doing their jobs right for the Lakers on offensive end. That's where Lebron, Dwight, and Wade failed, their teams scoring efficiently against the Celtics' D. The Celtics always enjoy 'grind out' games as we've seen in their 3 wins in this series and they I think are the best team at it.

If you don't want Artest to struggle, then why not give him more open looks/lanes rather than giving him the ball on rare occassions(mostly uncomfortable position) and expect miracle plays out of him. On defensive end, he's the hardest worker for sure.
THX TO DOPE-JAO FOR THE SPECIAL SIG! <3
Image
Enjoy! <3 Jao
User avatar
NovU
Crap, what am I going to brag about now?
 
Posts: 11325
Joined: Tue Jun 05, 2007 6:50 pm

Re: NBA Finals: Lakers (1) vs Celtics (4)

Postby George7 on Mon Jun 14, 2010 9:04 pm

One win to go!
User avatar
George7
 
Posts: 3856
Joined: Fri Jul 11, 2008 8:01 pm
Location: Athens,Greece

Re: NBA Finals: Lakers (1) vs Celtics (4)

Postby shadowgrin on Mon Jun 14, 2010 9:44 pm

koberulz wrote:When did Artest win the Suns series?

He didn't. He saved the team (and redeemed himself as Lamrock mentioned) by giving them the victory with that putback from the Kobe miss instead of going through OT, giving them a comfortable 3-2 edge against the Suns, and contributed significantly to help Kobe in closing out the Suns in game six.
HE'S USING HYPNOSIS!
JaoSming2KTV wrote:its fun on a bun
shadowgrin
Doesn't negotiate with terrorists. NLSC's Jefferson Davis. The Questioneer
 
Posts: 23229
Joined: Thu Dec 12, 2002 6:21 am
Location: In your mind

Re: NBA Finals: Lakers (1) vs Celtics (4)

Postby koberulz on Mon Jun 14, 2010 9:47 pm

Of course he wouldn't have had to hit that game-winner if he hadn't taken that godawful shot the play prior.
User avatar
koberulz
Everything I say is false.
 
Posts: 4636
Joined: Sat Jun 04, 2005 11:46 pm
Location: Perth, Australia

Re: NBA Finals: Lakers (1) vs Celtics (4)

Postby shadowgrin on Mon Jun 14, 2010 10:58 pm

Can't really tell. For all we know that play could have resulted in a made shot or not, whether it was Artest or the other Lakers that would have eventually took the potential shot in that particular play, awful or open otherwise.
The Lakers also had their chances, from Gasol's unfortunate missed dunk and not getting the offensive rebound and also not getting the defensive rebound twice from the Suns missed shots.
I wouldn't dwell on that horrible shot by Artest to speculate that if he hadn't taken that shot the Lakers still would have had the lead and won game 5 outright.
HE'S USING HYPNOSIS!
JaoSming2KTV wrote:its fun on a bun
shadowgrin
Doesn't negotiate with terrorists. NLSC's Jefferson Davis. The Questioneer
 
Posts: 23229
Joined: Thu Dec 12, 2002 6:21 am
Location: In your mind

Re: NBA Finals: Lakers (1) vs Celtics (4)

Postby Sauru on Mon Jun 14, 2010 11:17 pm

i dont understand how artest does not foul rondo at the end. he just let rondo blow by him then get the pass to kg who got it to allen and thats all she wrote there. you put rondo on the line there he probably blows them both and the lakers still have a shot. so yeah, thanks ron
User avatar
Sauru
 
Posts: 7726
Joined: Sat Sep 06, 2003 11:01 am

Re: NBA Finals: Lakers (1) vs Celtics (4)

Postby koberulz on Tue Jun 15, 2010 12:05 am

Exactly. He didn't stick near Rondo to take the foul, but he didn't double Pierce either. Then he ran at Rondo at completely the wrong angle. After missing two free-throws.

The next four years should be fun...
User avatar
koberulz
Everything I say is false.
 
Posts: 4636
Joined: Sat Jun 04, 2005 11:46 pm
Location: Perth, Australia

Re: NBA Finals: Lakers (1) vs Celtics (4)

Postby puttincomputers on Tue Jun 15, 2010 2:02 am

i was disappointed when the bulls got rid of artest.... now i see why they did.
Dynasty: Puttins Bobcats yr1 http://manfrednba2k11bobcatdynasty.blogspot.com/
taking draft applications!
2010-11 Playoffs - Cats beat Celtics in 5!
Image

“All truth passes through three stages. First, it is ridiculed. Second, it is violently opposed. Third, it is accepted as being self-evident.”
Arthur Schopenhauer- German philosopher (1788 - 1860)
User avatar
puttincomputers
 
Posts: 1663
Joined: Wed Aug 15, 2007 10:59 am

Re: NBA Finals: Lakers (1) vs Celtics (4)

Postby Murat on Tue Jun 15, 2010 2:27 am

puttincomputers wrote:i was disappointed when the bulls got rid of artest.... now i see why they did.

Image
Murat
The modder formerly known as Badger
Contributor
 
Posts: 6486
Joined: Sun Feb 14, 2010 6:07 am
Location: US/East Coast

Re: NBA Finals: Lakers (1) vs Celtics (4)

Postby Sauru on Tue Jun 15, 2010 4:09 am

honestly this guy should not even be allowed to play anymore so whenever he fucks up i am happy with it
User avatar
Sauru
 
Posts: 7726
Joined: Sat Sep 06, 2003 11:01 am

Re: NBA Finals: Lakers (1) vs Celtics (4)

Postby Jeffx on Tue Jun 15, 2010 4:19 am

koberulz wrote:Exactly. He didn't stick near Rondo to take the foul, but he didn't double Pierce either. Then he ran at Rondo at completely the wrong angle. After missing two free-throws.

The next four years should be fun...


I heard on the radio, Kobe was so disgusted with Artest's defense, he wanted Phil to let him play Pierce, but Phil said no. Phil has to challenge this cat to pick up his game.
Jeffx
 
Posts: 3267
Joined: Thu Nov 14, 2002 4:09 am
Location: Bronx, New York

Re: NBA Finals: Lakers (1) vs Celtics (4)

Postby Axel The Great on Tue Jun 15, 2010 5:15 am

Ron Artest always fucks up his defense in crucial moments.
phpBB [video]

Around the :30 mark.
User avatar
Axel The Great
Visible Confusion
 
Posts: 4754
Joined: Tue Dec 29, 2009 11:06 am
Location: Houstoned

Re: NBA Finals: Lakers (1) vs Celtics (4)

Postby Sauru on Tue Jun 15, 2010 5:52 am

Jeffx wrote:
koberulz wrote:Exactly. He didn't stick near Rondo to take the foul, but he didn't double Pierce either. Then he ran at Rondo at completely the wrong angle. After missing two free-throws.

The next four years should be fun...


I heard on the radio, Kobe was so disgusted with Artest's defense, he wanted Phil to let him play Pierce, but Phil said no. Phil has to challenge this cat to pick up his game.


i saw the video of it. he was telling phil he wanted pierce and he said no. probably a good idea though. for all the good putting kobe on pierce would do you really needed him with rondo and allen. the problem was all the celtics were playing a good game
User avatar
Sauru
 
Posts: 7726
Joined: Sat Sep 06, 2003 11:01 am

Re: NBA Finals: Lakers (1) vs Celtics (4)

Postby koberulz on Tue Jun 15, 2010 6:24 am

What they were doing wasn't working, changing it up wouldn't have hurt.
User avatar
koberulz
Everything I say is false.
 
Posts: 4636
Joined: Sat Jun 04, 2005 11:46 pm
Location: Perth, Australia

Re: NBA Finals: Lakers (1) vs Celtics (4)

Postby Sauru on Tue Jun 15, 2010 6:58 am

i would not say that. i would agree that it was worth a try but it very well may have hurt them alot worse than what was happening
User avatar
Sauru
 
Posts: 7726
Joined: Sat Sep 06, 2003 11:01 am

Re: NBA Finals: Lakers (1) vs Celtics (4)

Postby koberulz on Tue Jun 15, 2010 7:46 am

A loss by 30 is no different to a loss by 5. If what you're doing isn't working, it can't hurt to try something different. It's not as though Kobe Bryant isn't a capable defender.
User avatar
koberulz
Everything I say is false.
 
Posts: 4636
Joined: Sat Jun 04, 2005 11:46 pm
Location: Perth, Australia

Re: NBA Finals: Lakers (1) vs Celtics (4)

Postby air gordon on Tue Jun 15, 2010 9:10 am

great job by Celtics defense (Y) Gasol last nite looked like 2008 Gasol (N)
Jump.
Scott Skiles answer to the question on how Eddy Curry can become a better rebounder
User avatar
air gordon
 
Posts: 7867
Joined: Wed Nov 13, 2002 4:06 pm
Location: windy city

Re: NBA Finals: Lakers (1) vs Celtics (4)

Postby Sauru on Tue Jun 15, 2010 11:33 am

koberulz wrote:A loss by 30 is no different to a loss by 5. If what you're doing isn't working, it can't hurt to try something different. It's not as though Kobe Bryant isn't a capable defender.


it can hurt is what i am saying. they stayed close enough to win the game still. maybe that change helps them get the win, maybe it make the game a blow out. i dont disagree that something should have been changed just saying that it could have been worse
User avatar
Sauru
 
Posts: 7726
Joined: Sat Sep 06, 2003 11:01 am

PreviousNext

Return to NBA & Basketball

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 7 guests