Lakers Thread

Lakers doesn`t really need a PG, they have Farmar, Shannon ( hope they will take him back ), Fisher.

And the Triangle doesn't really need a PG.

Lamar Odom, and I quote him, said 'I expect to come back and be playing more PG and SF as well as rebound more.' So basically he's saying he does everything.

Good thing with economic climate is that teams may not offer big contracts so with less offers, everyone may be back on board for next season.

everyone may be back on board for next season.

ME very happy if that will happen
Bynum should be schooled this offseason, that knee injury is taking him down. Jabbar has gone soft against him.

Bynum should be schooled this offseason, that knee injury is taking him down

Indeed, just when it looks like he was going to have a breakout season, he went down with an injury, twice. He still has a lot of room to improve though, and if he can stay injury-free throughout his career he can be a much more dominant center.

They can't win a championship next year.. Magic or Spurs will take it.Spurs is strong with healty Manu. NBA loses it's rating if Lakers will reign.

NBA loses it's rating if Lakers will reign.

Why? Explain.

They can't win a championship next year.. Magic or Spurs will take it.Spurs is strong with healty Manu. NBA loses it's rating if Lakers will reign.

yeah, spurs is surely a watchable team in the finals

NBA loses it's rating if Lakers will reign.

Why? Explain.

It get's boring? Just like in formula one.Schumacher was in top many years. F1 lost it's rating because of that.It get's boring when one man(read: team) only wins.

Explain the 95-98 Bulls then.

Explain the 95-98 Bulls then.

Kobe isn't Jordan?

So?

It get's boring when one team only wins.

If you're saying that Jordan is more likable than Kobe, then you didn't even support your original argument that it gets boring when one team only wins.


Please explain.

Jordan era was something different.You can't compare Jordan era Bulls with Lakers today.Can you?
If team like Lakers will reign with this kind of roster,it eventually get's boring.I don't care if you catch my point or not.It's just my opinion.

Why, what's the difference with the Lakers roster that will make them boring?

That would be historical if the lakers could get 2 in a row chance, and they would rise again with the new team, SHAQ and KOBE era is over, people would like to see what KB can do with the new team. So, cut the freakin BS, ratings will fall, chineese will watch the games still and that would be enough for the TV-stations.

Why, what's the difference with the Lakers roster that will make them boring?

1.Jordan was greatest bball ever.Everybody wanted to see him play.You can't compare Kobe with Jordan.
2.Rodman-His on court game(including trash talking and technical fouls) and off court life.People wanted to see that "phenom"
3.Pippen-Just solid basketball player.

What's Lakers got to offer(besides Kobe)? Gasol? Ariza? Odom?

1.Jordan was greatest bball ever.Everybody wanted to see him play.

Is this fact or your personal opinion? Everybody?

2.Rodman-His on court game(including trash talking and technical fouls) and off court life.People wanted to see that "phenom"

See question in #1.

3.Pippen-Just solid basketball player.

Define "solid" basketball player.

Is this fact or your personal opinion? Everybody?

Whole post is my opinion.
When we talk about Mike then it's fact. Jordan is the greatest.Maybe James will beat him when he finishes his career. If you don't agree with this, then you don't know the game of basketball.

See question in #1.

He was most scandalous player.People like scandals.

Define "solid" basketball player.

It depends what position are you playing.

When we talk about Mike then it's fact. Jordan is the greatest.Maybe James will beat him when he finishes his career. If you don't agree with this, then you don't know the game of basketball.

Show me proof that "Jordan was greatest bball ever", despite the disagreement in your statement.

People like scandals.

Proof or ban?

Define "solid" basketball player.

What the hell is Pippen's position? You know it, I know it, so answer my question.

You make no sense.I will give one answer how you reply to me:
You will be unknown 2.

Unknown 1: I am human.
Unknown 2: Give me some proof.


Example 2:

Unknown 1: I bought this bread from shop.
Unknown 2: Give me some proof.

Example 3:

Unknown 1: When i drink alcohol,i get drunk.
Unknown 2: Why?

Because you pass off your personal opinions as facts. How can you consider your statements as fact when you can't even show evidence proving it?

And your examples are erroneous because you're stating an action you (unknown 1) have already done or obviously shows, which itself can be considered proof.

You haven't even shown any legitimate argument to prove your other statments and try to pass them off as facts.

lol, look who's talking. Have you read your posts in that other thread?

No wonder MikeDwyane even thinks you're braindead than him.

Because you pass off your personal opinions as facts. How can you consider your statements as fact when you can't even show evidence proving it?

And your examples are erroneous because you're stating an action you (unknown 1) have already done or obviously shows, which itself can be considered proof.

You haven't even shown any legitimate argument to prove your other statments and try to pass them off as facts.

lol, look who's talking. Have you read your posts in that other thread?

No wonder MikeDwyane even thinks you're braindead than him.

WHY i have to prove he's good in my opinion? I must copy 120 pages stats of him?
I said whole post is my opinion! Where i am saying that everyone must agree with me?

WHY i have to prove he's good in my opinion? I must copy 120 pages stats of him?I said whole post is my opinion!

When we talk about Mike then it's fact

Where i am saying that everyone must agree with me?

If you don't agree with this

When we talk about Mike then it's fact

A fact is a pragmatic truth, a statement that can, at least in theory, be checked and either confirmed or denied.

You still don't get it, do you?
What is one's personal opinion? Personal opinions(random people from street) are written into book as a facts?
EDIT: There are no absolute truth.

No they are not written because personal opinions from random people on the street are not facts.


A fact is a pragmatic truth...a statement that can...be checked and either confirmed or denied

You still don't get it, do you?

The same can be said of you.

There are no absolute truth.

LMAO, then what the hell are you posting in that other thread? You believe in God yet consider there is no absolute truth?
Burn in hell bitch.