by Bang on Thu Jul 07, 2005 1:58 am
Since Madden sells better, of course EA will invest more money in it, have better staff, etc. Someone who can work out dynasty code more efficiently will go to the Madden staff not nba, regardless of their preference. It's sad really.
As for the 5 year difference, it doesn't really matter. FIFA's been there longer than Winning Eleven but FIFA has clearly been worse historically gameplay wise. Plus you can never have perfect gameplay. Madden changes theirs quite drastically every year. Every game feels SIGNIFICANTLY different from the predecessors while retaining the same feel. And when the hell did NBA Live EVER have the gameplay right? Isn't it about time? I mean Madden 2000 has the gameplay more "right" than NBA Live 2005. Heck, MVP baseball is more "right" and it's much younger than NBA Live. The fact is, NBA Live is just far inferior to Madden in terms of quality because Madden sells more and EA Sports will continue to invest more in Madden because of that. NBA Live will never catch up unless something drastic happens like NBA 2k series selling more than NBA Live. Furthermore, customers of NBA Live want an arcadier experience, unlike customers of Madden because arcadism does not make football any better. However, arcadism makes NBA Live "cooler".
Why can't EA Sports make NBA Live improve as much as Madden every year then? It simply doesn't. They only update it slightly because it still sells. I don't know if this will ever change. Hopefully I am wrong.