New Dynasty shots with Player Ratings 9-15

Talk about NBA Live 06 here.

Ratings fair and just?

For the most part
8
44%
I preferred the old 0-99 system
10
56%
 
Total votes : 18

Postby [C][B]#4 on Fri Sep 16, 2005 7:02 am

Joe Johnson an 87 is just ridiculous. just because he sign a 90 mil contract doesn't mean hez on par with vince, dirk, kidd or manu and other superstars in the high 80s range.
Image
User avatar
[C][B]#4
 
Posts: 503
Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2005 1:43 am
Location: Toronto

Postby Sauru on Fri Sep 16, 2005 7:36 am

i think alot of you need to realize that the players who do a bit of everything are gonna be rated higher than you would expect them to. for instance joe johnson being higher than dirk or marion higher than nash. the more you can do the better your overall will be. overall its just a number really that brings all the other stats together. personally i wish EA would just do away with the overall rateing and force us to judge based on what they can actually do and what thier other rateings are.
User avatar
Sauru
 
Posts: 7726
Joined: Sat Sep 06, 2003 11:01 am

Postby k083 on Fri Sep 16, 2005 7:50 am

[C][B]#4 wrote:Joe Johnson an 87 is just ridiculous. just because he sign a 90 mil contract doesn't mean hez on par with vince, dirk, kidd or manu and other superstars in the high 80s range.


QFT, players ass kissage by EA is unbelievable in 06...
User avatar
k083
 
Posts: 219
Joined: Sat Sep 10, 2005 6:12 am
Location: Dependent Variable

Postby Malfa on Fri Sep 16, 2005 8:06 am

0-99
User avatar
Malfa
 
Posts: 1992
Joined: Wed Jan 19, 2005 12:46 pm
Location: Portland, Oregon

Postby Anthony15 on Fri Sep 16, 2005 8:10 am

[C][B]#4 wrote:Joe Johnson an 87 is just ridiculous. just because he sign a 90 mil contract doesn't mean hez on par with vince, dirk, kidd or manu and other superstars in the high 80s range.


I agree. JJ can't be 87...bigger than Melo??? Joe might be a leader in the A-Town, but bigger than Melo...thats just fucked up...
Image
User avatar
Anthony15
 
Posts: 4823
Joined: Mon Apr 04, 2005 10:15 am
Location: Denver, Colorado

Postby Fitzy on Fri Sep 16, 2005 8:32 am

Isaiah214 wrote:RJefferson is 87
VC is 89
Kidd is 88


As a Nets fan, I am happy with these ratings :)
User avatar
Fitzy
 
Posts: 5179
Joined: Sat Mar 19, 2005 9:37 am
Location: Horsham, Victoria, Australia

Postby Wormy10 on Fri Sep 16, 2005 10:08 am

Vince and Kidd are ok but RJ is just not right :scold:
But I understand how you're happy lol
Image
User avatar
Wormy10
 
Posts: 2949
Joined: Fri Jul 23, 2004 1:15 pm
Location: Kentucky

Postby Goldenstatewarrior on Fri Sep 16, 2005 10:26 am

SAG375 wrote:Can someone give a direct link to the Player Evolution please... Dial-up is a little restricting as to looking at 200 images.


http://previews.operationsports.com/ima ... box231.jpg

http://previews.operationsports.com/ima ... box232.jpg

http://previews.operationsports.com/ima ... box233.jpg

http://previews.operationsports.com/ima ... box234.jpg

I am very happy for this feature. :)
User avatar
Goldenstatewarrior
 
Posts: 532
Joined: Tue Jul 26, 2005 9:10 am

Postby Voxel on Fri Sep 16, 2005 11:39 am

Anthony15 wrote:
[C][B]#4 wrote:Joe Johnson an 87 is just ridiculous. just because he sign a 90 mil contract doesn't mean hez on par with vince, dirk, kidd or manu and other superstars in the high 80s range.


I agree. JJ can't be 87...bigger than Melo??? Joe might be a leader in the A-Town, but bigger than Melo...thats just fucked up...


while i agree that JJ's overrated, it seems like a marketting move.
they must have thought about ppl in atlanta and giving them one player to actually want to play with their team.
Voxel
 
Posts: 240
Joined: Fri Jul 08, 2005 3:07 am

Postby Mike Bradford on Fri Sep 16, 2005 11:49 am

I guess im the only one disagreeing with Lebron being better than T-mac, who is way more experienced. Also, i dont give a shit what anyone says, Marion is a complete player, hands down.
Offense Wins Games, Defense Wins Championships.
Mike Bradford
 
Posts: 150
Joined: Sun Jun 05, 2005 2:07 am
Location: Cambridge

Postby Malfa on Fri Sep 16, 2005 11:53 am

http://previews.operationsports.com/ima ... box233.jpg

He loses 5 pounds but becomes a heavy build?
User avatar
Malfa
 
Posts: 1992
Joined: Wed Jan 19, 2005 12:46 pm
Location: Portland, Oregon

Postby Mike Bradford on Fri Sep 16, 2005 11:56 am

what the hell...i fail to see how that makes sense.
Offense Wins Games, Defense Wins Championships.
Mike Bradford
 
Posts: 150
Joined: Sun Jun 05, 2005 2:07 am
Location: Cambridge

Postby Malfa on Fri Sep 16, 2005 12:01 pm

Hopefully they fixed that problem..

Anyway the graphics look good and player evolution is sexy as hell.
User avatar
Malfa
 
Posts: 1992
Joined: Wed Jan 19, 2005 12:46 pm
Location: Portland, Oregon

Postby Mike Bradford on Fri Sep 16, 2005 12:58 pm

lol good call Malfa, good call.
Offense Wins Games, Defense Wins Championships.
Mike Bradford
 
Posts: 150
Joined: Sun Jun 05, 2005 2:07 am
Location: Cambridge

Postby Air Jordon on Fri Sep 16, 2005 1:00 pm

you guys are so homosexual, get a room.
This sig was too offensive for the kids.
Air Jordon
 
Posts: 560
Joined: Fri Apr 22, 2005 2:48 pm

Postby Matt on Fri Sep 16, 2005 6:35 pm

Joe Johnson at 87, is a little high. He's higher than nash. Atlanta will be good when that 87 transfers to them, as some of their players are a little high like Smith over 80.

Rasheed is too high at 89. He's not on par with Kirilenko, Pierce, or Vinsanity. And shaq is only 90, so sheed should be about 83-84.



JJ 87 because he can do EVERYTHING. Nash can't play D, has no athleticism, can't rebound, cant dunk....etc

Rasheed's 89 is a bit surprising but compare him to those 3 he still can do MORE than they can


GET IT INTO YOUR HEADS PEOPLE....MORE VERSATILE PLAYERS WILL HAVE HIGHER RATINGS..
Image
User avatar
Matt
 
Posts: 7236
Joined: Mon Oct 07, 2002 6:48 pm
Location: Australia

Postby TheFranchise3 on Fri Sep 16, 2005 9:28 pm

Francis got 89 again, thats good enough for me lol I expected them to snub him to a 86 or something
User avatar
TheFranchise3
 
Posts: 88
Joined: Tue Jun 28, 2005 7:31 pm

Postby Steve [The Spiderman] on Fri Sep 16, 2005 10:40 pm

Thanks a lot Da Balla! And yes...I've been waiting for them to put this back in there. I also hope they have that graph that they used to have in 2000 so you can see development over multiple years.
Image
User avatar
Steve [The Spiderman]
 
Posts: 1783
Joined: Mon Apr 19, 2004 8:08 am
Location: Michigan

Postby Indy on Sat Sep 17, 2005 1:14 am

These are quite possibly the worst ratings ever. I will definitley be going with 2k6 again this year.
Image
User avatar
Indy
 
Posts: 5240
Joined: Tue Dec 21, 2004 1:32 pm
Location: Dublin

Postby VlaDiv on Sat Sep 17, 2005 1:34 am

SAG375 wrote: I also hope they have that graph that they used to have in 2000 so you can see development over multiple years.


The thing was, that graph was never really correct. You'd have a guy like Grant Hill, starts off at 87. By the time he's been in decline, it shows only his original rating at like at 83. It picks up the general trend, but it doesn't actually keep the ratings exact. Then live 02, 03 for xbox had a written version that was even worse.

Another feature would be nice would be a "Roster Snapshot" to look back and see every player on your team in previous years. Like say I'm at year 4, I could look back and see who was there in year 3, year 2, year 1, say after the trade deadline. Have it say their ratings, stats and team's record.
User avatar
VlaDiv
 
Posts: 332
Joined: Tue Jul 20, 2004 4:42 pm
Location: East Coast USA

Postby Fitzy on Sat Sep 17, 2005 11:12 am

What is the old 0-99 system?
User avatar
Fitzy
 
Posts: 5179
Joined: Sat Mar 19, 2005 9:37 am
Location: Horsham, Victoria, Australia

Postby CERVANTES on Sun Sep 18, 2005 4:08 am

The 0-99 system was that players ratings were in a scale of 50 to 99.

I posted something wrong here and I edited :P
Image
User avatar
CERVANTES
 
Posts: 772
Joined: Fri Feb 11, 2005 3:26 am
Location: La Soleada España

Postby fgrep15 on Sun Sep 18, 2005 4:38 am

Matt wrote:
Joe Johnson at 87, is a little high. He's higher than nash. Atlanta will be good when that 87 transfers to them, as some of their players are a little high like Smith over 80.

Rasheed is too high at 89. He's not on par with Kirilenko, Pierce, or Vinsanity. And shaq is only 90, so sheed should be about 83-84.



JJ 87 because he can do EVERYTHING. Nash can't play D, has no athleticism, can't rebound, cant dunk....etc

Rasheed's 89 is a bit surprising but compare him to those 3 he still can do MORE than they can


GET IT INTO YOUR HEADS PEOPLE....MORE VERSATILE PLAYERS WILL HAVE HIGHER RATINGS..

Thank you, you hear all these people like how cna an MVP only be an 85 :shock:. Well let's see, Nash can't defender man to man, can't steal, can't jump, can't dunk, won't have high rebound ratings, only averaged 15 PPG last season etc...

Rasheed is the only one that really surprised me because he's good, but even when he was on Portland he wouldn't get an 89 lol, and then he was scoring more :lol:

All in all, we can edit ratings, and everyone should if they want to enjoy the game to it's fullest. Overall ratings are so stupid, they should just take them out of the game....
CP3 | Brand | Arenas | Calderon
Raptors | Wizards | Clippers
User avatar
fgrep15
 
Posts: 3172
Joined: Mon Nov 03, 2003 1:43 am
Location: Canada

Previous

Return to NBA Live 06

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests