The Hawks/Raptors Issue - Al Claims He Touched the Ball

Like real basketball, as well as basketball video games? Talk about the NBA, NCAA, and other professional and amateur basketball leagues here.

The Hawks/Raptors Issue - Al Claims He Touched the Ball

Postby Fizdale on Fri Apr 04, 2008 9:13 pm

Another protest??? Toronto is leaning towards compiling a complaint on a game protest regarding to their OT loss to the Hawks. The clock started earlier before it went to tj's hands- BUT AL HORDFORD SPEAKED OUT. Ï've touched a part of the ball" But did he???

Globe And Mail -
Could the Hawks be subject to yet another protest?

According to the Globe and Mail, the Raptors are still considering filing an official protest regarding how they lost to the Atlanta Hawks on Wednesday night.

According to the report, it appeared the game clock started a fraction of a second too early and cost Toronto an apparent win. T.J. Ford made a layup at the buzzer but it was waived away.

Teams have 48 hours to lodge a protest and it costs $10,000 (U.S.) to submit it to the league office.

"I think it counted, I would have to say we were [robbed]," Ford said after practice yesterday. "If you look at the replay, it's evident that they did start the clock early."

According to NBA spokesman Tim Frank, the clock was started because Hawks forward Al Horford tipped the ball after the pass was made by Delfino.


Some media links for ya buddys:

Image

and

Image
Image
© Kbryant8 on His Greatness
User avatar
Fizdale
 
Posts: 467
Joined: Sun Mar 02, 2008 11:09 am

Postby Fizdale on Fri Apr 04, 2008 9:20 pm

Well here is my opinion, Boston isnt safe when they face Atlanta at the first round, of coz the NBA "Where Amazing Happens" quote is the best way to describe it. First the Heat/Hawks Game and now this lol. Now, let's see. First, the raptors claimed that they mus win the game, THE CLOCK STARTED PREMATURELY before it got to tj's hands. Now, there was an article posted that R.O.Y Candidate Al Horford Claims to touch a part of the ball - reason why the keepers started the clock. Now the question is did he??? At the semi-video that I have posted above, IT DOESNT LOOK LIKE HE HAS TOUCHED IT, BUT IN THE PIC, IT LOOKS LIKE HE HAS TOUCHED IT. But imo, IT THE BALL WAS ONLY ON AL'S HANDS AND LOOKED LIKE DEPLECTED.

SO Im a go for a replay :)
Image
© Kbryant8 on His Greatness
User avatar
Fizdale
 
Posts: 467
Joined: Sun Mar 02, 2008 11:09 am

Postby J@3 on Fri Apr 04, 2008 10:03 pm

He didn't touch it, he's full of shit. The picture looks like he's palming it because of the angle, you can tell from the ball protruding out the right hand side of his hand that it's actually not touching him because the trajectory doesn't seem to change paths at all in the original pass.
User avatar
J@3
 
Posts: 19815
Joined: Thu Mar 11, 2004 3:25 pm
Location: MLB

Postby Sauru on Sat Apr 05, 2008 2:22 am

i gotta agree with jae, i dont think he actually did touch the ball.
User avatar
Sauru
 
Posts: 7726
Joined: Sat Sep 06, 2003 11:01 am

Postby Patr1ck on Sat Apr 05, 2008 2:57 am

That pass was on the mark. Such a pass would have been changed dramatically even if it had been nicked barely. Not to mention that any interruption in the balls path would disrupt it's rotation. Also, the clock was started perfectly at the moment TJ Ford received the pass.
Patr1ck
Administrator
Administrator
 
Posts: 13340
Joined: Thu May 19, 2005 5:54 pm
Location: Pasadena, California, US

Postby joejam999 on Sat Apr 05, 2008 3:56 am

The first picture looks like maybe it hits his forearm but still goes right. The 2nd pic there is no way it touches his forearm it floats to the right of his arm. He did not touch it. I really want to see the Hawks in the playoffs but nope he didn't touch it.

Pdub wrote: Also, the clock was started perfectly at the moment TJ Ford received the pass.


The clock was at .6. It was at .4 when he grabbed it for the lay-in. I think it started a little early.
User avatar
joejam999
 
Posts: 1294
Joined: Thu Jan 27, 2005 7:40 am
Location: Utah

Postby Lamrock on Sat Apr 05, 2008 4:02 am

The Hawks need to redo this game also.
Image
User avatar
Lamrock
 
Posts: 10936
Joined: Tue Jul 05, 2005 4:02 pm
Location: Washington State

Postby Andrew on Sat Apr 05, 2008 4:42 am

The angle of the still suggests Horford got a piece of it but the video begs to differ. As Jae said, the trajectory doesn't appear to change.
User avatar
Andrew
Retro Basketball Gamer
Administrator
 
Posts: 115128
Joined: Thu Aug 22, 2002 8:51 pm
Location: Australia

Postby shadowgrin on Sat Apr 05, 2008 5:02 am

This makes a suitable case for the challenge system like in the NFL (as discussed in another thread).
HE'S USING HYPNOSIS!
JaoSming2KTV wrote:its fun on a bun
shadowgrin
Doesn't negotiate with terrorists. NLSC's Jefferson Davis. The Questioneer
 
Posts: 23229
Joined: Thu Dec 12, 2002 6:21 am
Location: In your mind

Postby Skills on Sat Apr 05, 2008 6:39 am

shadowgrin wrote:This makes a suitable case for the challenge system like in the NFL (as discussed in another thread).


I second that. Anyway, it was nice of Al to visit TJ while he was in the hospital after he slugged him. But his "ball-touching" ( :lol: ) comment is just stupid.
The Hawks were obviously expecting CB4 or Jamario to dunk it, so they had to find an excuse for this play..
Anyway, the only way the Raps could've won that is if they pulled a Mike Brown and ran off the court.
User avatar
Skills
Man On The Moon
 
Posts: 961
Joined: Sat Dec 29, 2007 1:14 pm
Location: Canada

Postby Drex on Sat Apr 05, 2008 10:32 am

I remember when .4 happened some people claimed that the clock started too late. It's a human controlling the clock, but we are not fast enough to make exact movements that quick.
Image
User avatar
Drex
You bastards!!!
 
Posts: 6074
Joined: Tue Nov 12, 2002 10:48 am
Location: Iquique, Chile

Postby Andrew on Sat Apr 05, 2008 11:22 am

The current instant replay rules pretty much ensure that shots like Derek Fisher's are all on the level though. If the proposed expansions are made, there should be provisions made for claims that the clock started early or that a certain player did or did not touch the ball. A ruling could be made from the tape and the final possession could be replayed immediately if necessary.
User avatar
Andrew
Retro Basketball Gamer
Administrator
 
Posts: 115128
Joined: Thu Aug 22, 2002 8:51 pm
Location: Australia


Return to NBA & Basketball

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests