keepnitgangsta1 wrote:Just because in one series hes been called for a lot of fouls doesn't mean hes a bad defender.
Axel wrote:keepnitgangsta1 wrote:Just because in one series hes been called for a lot of fouls doesn't mean hes a bad defender.
You're forgetting that he averaged nearly 4 fouls per game in only 26 mpg during the regular season. He was worse than Eddy Curry.
Colin wrote:Nick, whenever you post you seem like a smug little bastard because of the dude with the sunglasses playing the drums.
Colin wrote:Nick, whenever you post you seem like a smug little bastard because of the dude with the sunglasses playing the drums.
VanK wrote:But he is young and there is general opinion of him that he still has some potential left. I think it was very uncharacteristical move for the Bulls' managment to giving him that huge contract. I thought they were building smart and on foundation consisted of hard working winners and I don't know how exactly Chandler fits that description. If the Bulls don't trade their picks for O'Neal/KG, they'll 100% draft a big man with their #1 pick, which is either Aldridge or Thomas and neither of them has game suitable to play with a centre like Chandler.
keepnitgangsta1 wrote:Axel wrote:keepnitgangsta1 wrote:Just because in one series hes been called for a lot of fouls doesn't mean hes a bad defender.
You're forgetting that he averaged nearly 4 fouls per game in only 26 mpg during the regular season. He was worse than Eddy Curry.
He fouls a lot so he is agressive. Still good at d.
Axel wrote:keepnitgangsta1 wrote:Axel wrote:keepnitgangsta1 wrote:Just because in one series hes been called for a lot of fouls doesn't mean hes a bad defender.
You're forgetting that he averaged nearly 4 fouls per game in only 26 mpg during the regular season. He was worse than Eddy Curry.
He fouls a lot so he is agressive. Still good at d.
BS. I could step on the court and foul every play, that doesnt mean its good defense.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 15 guests