I think Nate Robinson just broke a new record

Like real basketball, as well as basketball video games? Talk about the NBA, NCAA, and other professional and amateur basketball leagues here.

I think Nate Robinson just broke a new record

Postby Jackie Kong on Sat Nov 19, 2005 4:37 pm

Today Nate had one block and i think he is the youngest player ever under 5-10 to do one :lol: . I thought i had to post this with all the discussions about Lebron's new records,ha.
User avatar
Jackie Kong
 
Posts: 527
Joined: Mon Oct 03, 2005 5:18 am

Postby Fitzy on Sat Nov 19, 2005 4:42 pm

Well done Nate, who did he block
User avatar
Fitzy
 
Posts: 5179
Joined: Sat Mar 19, 2005 9:37 am
Location: Horsham, Victoria, Australia

Postby streetballaz1 on Sat Nov 19, 2005 4:52 pm

watch earl boyking records,he alredy did a block this year!
http://www.nba.com/playerfile/earl_boykins/?nav=page
his record is,2 vs. Minnesota 11/04/04
Image
Thanks to cable guy for the sig
my jersey avatars
User avatar
streetballaz1
 
Posts: 1614
Joined: Wed Jun 22, 2005 3:47 am
Location: LA

Postby Doobie on Sun Nov 20, 2005 12:25 am

He was talking about "youngest player under 5-10" not "player under 5-10" to have a block .
New York Knicks
User avatar
Doobie
didn't do it.
 
Posts: 3662
Joined: Sat Jul 03, 2004 3:51 am
Location: NYC

Postby The GOAT on Sun Nov 20, 2005 2:52 am

:o :shock: holy shit earl had 12 blaocks last year
Image

There is no truth. There is only you and what you make the truth.
The GOAT
 
Posts: 3197
Joined: Mon Oct 06, 2003 11:06 am
Location: Long Island, New York

Postby Gator on Sun Nov 20, 2005 4:00 am

I hope Nate get's the ROY award this year..
Image
Gator
 
Posts: 1301
Joined: Fri Aug 12, 2005 7:47 am
Location: Toronto, Canada

Postby Amphatoast on Sun Nov 20, 2005 4:14 am

frye has a better chance.
Amphatoast
 
Posts: 3004
Joined: Wed Jul 02, 2003 5:45 am
Location: new york

Postby Jackal on Sun Nov 20, 2005 4:51 am

I hope Nate get's the ROY award this year..

Based on? Just biasedness, his shortness or because you think he's cute?
User avatar
Jackal
 
Posts: 14877
Joined: Fri Mar 21, 2003 2:59 am

Postby Doobie on Sun Nov 20, 2005 5:30 am

biasedness I doubt , in another thread he says hes a raptor fan . Channing Frye is the Knicks best Rookie , and right now it looks like he is an EARLY canidate for ROY , even though I doubt he'll get it.
New York Knicks
User avatar
Doobie
didn't do it.
 
Posts: 3662
Joined: Sat Jul 03, 2004 3:51 am
Location: NYC

Postby Amphatoast on Sun Nov 20, 2005 7:21 am

if the knicks insert him into the starting line up Frye has a serious chance of winning ROY. He could easily average 25/10 with the way he is playing.
Amphatoast
 
Posts: 3004
Joined: Wed Jul 02, 2003 5:45 am
Location: new york

Postby Jackie Kong on Sun Nov 20, 2005 7:35 am

Amphatoast wrote:if the knicks insert him into the starting line up Frye has a serious chance of winning ROY. He could easily average 25/10 with the way he is playing.


I almost sure Frye will be the starting center by the start of next year, if not before because Antonio Davis wont last much longer with the knicks.
User avatar
Jackie Kong
 
Posts: 527
Joined: Mon Oct 03, 2005 5:18 am

Postby Amphatoast on Sun Nov 20, 2005 8:10 am

you mean starting PF? Curry is the starting C right now..
putting frye @ PF would be a good move, then push him to C when curry gets into foul trouble. But I'm not sure if curry and frye games can work together, i don't think brown has put both of them on the floor at the same time yet..
Amphatoast
 
Posts: 3004
Joined: Wed Jul 02, 2003 5:45 am
Location: new york

Postby Fresh8 on Sun Nov 20, 2005 8:50 am

Just to let you all know, Muggsy Bogues had 39 career blocks... maybe more impressive! :)
User avatar
Fresh8
The poster formerly known as Sit
 
Posts: 14872
Joined: Mon Nov 11, 2002 5:19 pm

Postby Jackie Kong on Sun Nov 20, 2005 10:57 am

Amphatoast wrote:you mean starting PF? Curry is the starting C right now..
putting frye @ PF would be a good move, then push him to C when curry gets into foul trouble. But I'm not sure if curry and frye games can work together, i don't think brown has put both of them on the floor at the same time yet..


Curry would move to pf. If Davis is traded i think New York would be using a similar system like the one the bulls usually used to have chandler and curry in the court.
User avatar
Jackie Kong
 
Posts: 527
Joined: Mon Oct 03, 2005 5:18 am

Postby Doobie on Sun Nov 20, 2005 11:57 am

Davis isn't going to get traded hes a huge expiring contract . This year both Penny and Davis are Free Agents .
New York Knicks
User avatar
Doobie
didn't do it.
 
Posts: 3662
Joined: Sat Jul 03, 2004 3:51 am
Location: NYC

Postby Stevesanity on Sun Nov 20, 2005 12:01 pm

Congratulations to him although Nate is over-hyped just cause he can dunk and is quick on the floor. Give him an average point guard height of say 6-1 to 6-2 and he'd be half as loved/popular as he is now.

The Knicks will lose like 28+ million in cap space but will still be over the cap and they dont even have Shaq, now thats sad.
Image
Signature Thanks to My Crappy Photoshop Skills :crazy:
User avatar
Stevesanity
 
Posts: 786
Joined: Tue Jun 28, 2005 8:11 pm
Location: Los Angeles

Postby Jackie Kong on Sun Nov 20, 2005 1:02 pm

I am almost sure Davis will be traded by the start one next season. Denver might be his new home. And i think Nate could be having even better stats if he was in another team. I mean, it is not so nice to player under Marbury and Crawford and the knicks are already thinking of adding another pg.
User avatar
Jackie Kong
 
Posts: 527
Joined: Mon Oct 03, 2005 5:18 am

Postby Stevesanity on Sun Nov 20, 2005 1:32 pm

marcusmirx wrote:I am almost sure Davis will be traded by the start one next season. Denver might be his new home. And i think Nate could be having even better stats if he was in another team. I mean, it is not so nice to player under Marbury and Crawford and the knicks are already thinking of adding another pg.

Thats because Nate plays in a similar rhythm as Starbury and Crawford. There all shoot first pass second guards now though Marbury use to be the opposite.

Nate cant control an offense, he could have 10 assists per night but there's a difference between someone thats a good point guard and someone that just has big assist numbers(ala DPOY debates). Yeah I admire Nate for being so small and being able to dunk :roll: and play in the league, but lets be realistic here he isnt any better than Marbury and is probably equal if not a tad batter than Crawford..plus Jamal is a natural SG in the first place.

Its the reason why the Nuggets start Miller over Boykins, Dre may not be as quick or as exciting as Boykins but he has much more mature point guard skills...I dont even like Dre(lost us D-Mile and had a flop of a season) but common sense says you start him over Earl Boykins 99% of the time. I love Boyk as a person and an player but he's no Muggsy nor is Nate.
Image
Signature Thanks to My Crappy Photoshop Skills :crazy:
User avatar
Stevesanity
 
Posts: 786
Joined: Tue Jun 28, 2005 8:11 pm
Location: Los Angeles

Postby [L3]1101 on Sun Nov 20, 2005 3:56 pm

Image

is this the one?
Image
User avatar
[L3]1101
 
Posts: 889
Joined: Sun Feb 20, 2005 11:36 am
Location: Canada

Postby streetballaz1 on Sun Nov 20, 2005 4:35 pm

wow,that's a nice block! :D,but it look life a foul
Last edited by streetballaz1 on Mon Nov 21, 2005 7:11 am, edited 1 time in total.
Image
Thanks to cable guy for the sig
my jersey avatars
User avatar
streetballaz1
 
Posts: 1614
Joined: Wed Jun 22, 2005 3:47 am
Location: LA

Postby cklitsie on Sun Nov 20, 2005 10:16 pm

That's a foul. :roll:

I really dislike Nate Robinson, overhyped as fuck and he hasn't really done anything spectacular yet. People like him because he's small and can jump.
Pretty funny too that when he gets a block you guys are like 'wow, he's 5-10 and he blocks someone' and all of a sudden forget it's the same Nate you overhype because he can jump so high.

streetballaz1, I hope you don't really live in LA, because I seriously doubt you'd survive there given your english might even be worse than your photoshop skills..
User avatar
cklitsie
 
Posts: 6511
Joined: Sun May 11, 2003 3:02 am

Postby Fenix on Sun Nov 20, 2005 10:30 pm

He's a score first midget. I mean, if he was 6'2'', 6'3'', he would just be another player in the Steve Francis mold. I mean, small people like him because he's small. That's about it. Like they have that much in common with a mega athletic, super skilled black man who's built like a brick.
"Sometimes a player's greatest challenge is coming to grips with his role on the team." (Scottie Pippen, #33)
User avatar
Fenix
There's no I in threesome
 
Posts: 3015
Joined: Sat Dec 04, 2004 11:32 pm
Location: Slovenia

Postby air gordon on Mon Nov 21, 2005 9:07 am

Stevesanity wrote:Congratulations to him although Nate is over-hyped just cause he can dunk and is quick on the floor. Give him an average point guard height of say 6-1 to 6-2 and he'd be half as loved/popular as he is now.

agreed
Its the reason why the Nuggets start Miller over Boykins, Dre may not be as quick or as exciting as Boykins but he has much more mature point guard skills...I dont even like Dre(lost us D-Mile and had a flop of a season) but common sense says you start him over Earl Boykins 99% of the time. I love Boyk as a person and an player but he's no Muggsy nor is Nate.

yep- boykins is a good change of pace type player to bring off the bench. most of the time he's just looking for his own shots. his height basically makes it 5-4 for the defense.
Jump.
Scott Skiles answer to the question on how Eddy Curry can become a better rebounder
User avatar
air gordon
 
Posts: 7867
Joined: Wed Nov 13, 2002 4:06 pm
Location: windy city

Postby Jackie Kong on Mon Nov 21, 2005 9:46 am

air gordon wrote:
Stevesanity wrote:Congratulations to him although Nate is over-hyped just cause he can dunk and is quick on the floor. Give him an average point guard height of say 6-1 to 6-2 and he'd be half as loved/popular as he is now.

agreed
Its the reason why the Nuggets start Miller over Boykins, Dre may not be as quick or as exciting as Boykins but he has much more mature point guard skills...I dont even like Dre(lost us D-Mile and had a flop of a season) but common sense says you start him over Earl Boykins 99% of the time. I love Boyk as a person and an player but he's no Muggsy nor is Nate.

yep- boykins is a good change of pace type player to bring off the bench. most of the time he's just looking for his own shots. his height basically makes it 5-4 for the defense.


Most pgs are bigger but can't dunk the ball as Robinson. Besides he adds a lot of pressure and intensity to the game, not to mention speed. I believe Nate will have a very good career because of all that and if he can improve his shooting.

About Boykins, he is a really efficient player mostly because he is a great ft shooter and also because he is one of the faster players of the league. Because of that i think he is a player he can start without problems in some teams.
User avatar
Jackie Kong
 
Posts: 527
Joined: Mon Oct 03, 2005 5:18 am

Postby Amphatoast on Mon Nov 21, 2005 10:02 am

robinson is also a good rebounder for his size.
Amphatoast
 
Posts: 3004
Joined: Wed Jul 02, 2003 5:45 am
Location: new york

Next

Return to NBA & Basketball

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 14 guests