Good idea in theory but I think it's a bit excessive. The concept of players being made to wear business casual in between games, press conferences etc - ie times when the public/media might spot them - is more of a private school ideal rather than general society. But it is well within the NBA's rights to uphold a dress code, and since it's in the new CBA the player's union must have agreed to it.
I'm no fan of the race card either; I can see where Jackson is coming from but I do agree with boconcio, he's the one bringing race into the whole matter even if there's some truth in his assertions.
San Antonio's Tim Duncan, also a critic of the new policy, did not play in Tuesday's game and sat on the bench wearing an untucked shirt and baggy jeans -- attire that could result in a fine if seen during a regular-season game.
"I think it's a load of crap," Duncan told the San Antonio Express-News. "I understand what they're trying to do with [forbidding] hats and 'do rags and [retro] jerseys and stuff. That's fine. But I don't understand why they would take it to this level. I think it's basically retarded.
"I don't like the direction they're going, but who am I?"
Duncan told the newspaper that, in the future, he might choose to stay in the locker room on nights he isn't playing.
We might have media outburst of the year right there, if only because it's Duncan. That's the part I like best about this whole thing, actually - the fact Stern's going to have to deal with Duncan over it. The only way it could be more entertaining is if Duncan was to start wearing chains to Mr T proportions and referring to David Stern as "bitch" or "boner". Multiple tattoos and coloured hair couldn't be far away if that ever happened.