Main Site | Forum | Rules | Downloads | Wiki | Features | Podcast

NLSC Forum

Like real basketball, as well as basketball video games? Talk about the NBA, NCAA, and other professional and amateur basketball leagues here.
Post a reply

Tue Oct 04, 2005 5:42 pm

I think it works out good for both sides.

New York get the C they been looking for and release an unhappy player in Thomas.

Chicago get rid of their unhappy player and an old fairly high paid player for some young promising players and a HUGE expiring contract.

I would have liked to see Crawford back there though :(

Tue Oct 04, 2005 6:14 pm

i guess this mean Curry signed that $5mil deal, for probably 1 year, which makes this deal a lot more less risky and again AD's contract is expiring at the end of this season. So if things don't work out for Curry, Knicks don't loose much, almost nothing.

Tue Oct 04, 2005 6:52 pm

nooooo Sweetney is freakin awesome... no way he'll start over Chandler
should have started in NY this year

Tue Oct 04, 2005 7:20 pm

What about Frye ? What will happen with him.


Frye will now switch to playing power forward.


why the hell did Bulls give AD away?


Just to make the money side of it work, the knicks might not even keep him...

i guess this mean Curry signed that $5mil deal, for probably 1 year, which makes this deal a lot more less risky and again AD's contract is expiring at the end of this season. So if things don't work out for Curry, Knicks don't loose much, almost nothing.


Sadly... Eddy's signed up a 5 year deal with the knicks 1st year thought to be around 10 million :shock:

Tue Oct 04, 2005 7:28 pm

Everyone's talking about Crawford... Sweetney was the one bright spot on the Knicks roster last season... He should have been the starter now and probably could be that for the bulls too. Chandler in the middle and Sweetney at the four.

I don't think Tim Thomas will get too much playing time unless his attitude improves by heaps before the season begins. Maybe he was just in need of a new scenery.

Sweetney for Curry was the real deal... That's was the real steal.

Tue Oct 04, 2005 8:17 pm

Antonio Davis might be staying in Chicago...makes sense, I think :roll:

http://www.realgm.com/src_wiretap_archi ... o_chicago/

Tue Oct 04, 2005 8:51 pm

So that makes the trade essentially Curry for Sweetney, Thomas, Jackson, 1st round pick and 2 2nd round picks, going by the real GM article. That looks good for the Bulls and quite questionable for the Knicks. I'm just hoping that both Curry and Sweetney continue to develop so both teams gain something out of this trade instead of it heavily favouring one party.

Tue Oct 04, 2005 8:55 pm

I hope Curry and his fat arse gets too overweight so that he cant play in the L anymore!
Hes wasting too much locker room for the bulls and wasting all the material used for the Bulls jerseys! :x

Tue Oct 04, 2005 9:36 pm

Good move for both sides, all things considered... Bulls get youth and bench depth, while the Knicks get a scoring inside threat. (Y)

Tue Oct 04, 2005 9:49 pm

So.... Two lazy fat ass centers on the Knicks who need to prove themselves.... Interesting.

Tue Oct 04, 2005 10:25 pm

I like the idea of the Bulls starting Chandler at the 5 and Sweetney at the 4.

And for the Knicks, they have plenty of bigmen to choose from now that can score. The only question is whether they can rebound. As for defense, I know James can play defense but I'm not sure about Curry. Larry Brown will work it out I'm sure.

Offensively though the Knicks have great floor balance.

Tue Oct 04, 2005 11:20 pm

Its_asdf wrote:So.... Two lazy fat ass centers on the Knicks who need to prove themselves.... Interesting.


Yep...leave it to the Knicks to get another underachieving player with a (potential) serious health problem(sigh). Thanks, Isiah.

This team's just sinking further & further.....

Tue Oct 04, 2005 11:59 pm

So that makes the trade essentially Curry for Sweetney, Thomas, Jackson, 1st round pick and 2 2nd round picks


Geez, that's a fantastic trade for Chicago. Especially the draft picks since the Knicks have become well... the Knicks.

Wed Oct 05, 2005 3:54 am

i don't see why some were thinking crawford would be heading back to the bulls in the trade. Paxson wasn't even wiling to pay him a little more then the full MLE and traded him for expiring contracts! that's says enough

nyk side of the deal:
being in a peculiar salary cap situation, i think it was a risk worth taking for the knicks. but giving curry a 6yr/55mil contract that's not insured is a questionable move. that's probably near curry's market value before this heart condition came up!

assuming curry is good to go, his inside scoring will help out the nyk offense greatly. he has great hands and that jump hook is almost undefendable. richardson and crawford will get plenty of good looks from the land of 3.

defensively & reboudning, another story

chicago side of the deal: considering they weren't going to play him until the he takes the DNA test (whether this was the right or wrong stance to take by Paxson, who knows), this was an ok deal. the key was getting expiring contracts and a 1st round draft pick in return.

sweetney is a decent stopgap low post scorer. chicago will have ~$23 million next offseason to use on curry's permanent replacement.

it's also being reported that Davis is expected to be cut by nyk and the bulls plan to resign him then. i think thomas will be traded


overall, i can't say that one team "won" this trade. it's really contingent on eddy being able to play or not.

i think it's clear that zeke is in full mercenary mode. i hope for curry's sake he will take that DNA test privately. i wish him well

fyi: tyson chandler is the ONLY bull left from the krause era... and allan houston is the only holdover pre-isiah thomas

Wed Oct 05, 2005 5:00 am

air gordon wrote:nyk side of the deal:
being in a peculiar salary cap situation, i think it was a risk worth taking for the knicks. but giving curry a 6yr/55mil contract that's not insured is a questionable move. that's probably near curry's market value before this heart condition came up!

assuming curry is good to go, his inside scoring will help out the nyk offense greatly. he has great hands and that jump hook is almost undefendable. richardson and crawford will get plenty of good looks from the land of 3.

defensively & reboudning, another story


Well, that's going to be a problem considering the coach.

IMO, Curry's too much of a risk.

Wed Oct 05, 2005 6:14 am

Good trade for both teams, Knicks get the center they need. Bulls now have Chandler at C and Tim Thomas.

Wed Oct 05, 2005 6:18 am

Tim Thomas.... I've always rooted for the guy, but he just plain blows ass and always fails to deliver year after year. Maybe this trade could help him actually live up to his potential, and it is his contract year.

New York, as usual, overpays a guy with a questionable heart problem/work ethic. Good job Isiah, we salute you.

Wed Oct 05, 2005 8:30 am

This is the 2nd year in a row that the Knicks got the Bulls leading scorer . Well , I like the trade , but the fact that its a first round pick is sorta bothering me . Does anyone know what pick it is exactly?? And is it lottery Protected??

Wed Oct 05, 2005 9:08 am

Full details are out now: http://www.insidehoops.com/curry-trade- ... 0405.shtml

I think this is really a win/win situation. Chicago could have done three things with Curry:

1) Sign him to a long term deal. Bad risk for the Bulls, as if he can't play they lose a lot of cap space to get a replacement next offseason.
2) Let him play for the QO. Bad risk for the bulls, because if he can't play they lose him for nothing, if he does play he's likely to have bad blood and want to leave at the end anyway and lose him for nothing.
3) Sign and trade him.

At least with this sign and trade they get something out of it. From the Knicks point of view, who cares about the risk involved, they're not getting under the cap anytime soon so even if he ends up not being able to play the cap space hit isn't hurting them.

Bottom line is the Knicks are in a good situation to gamble on Curry, the Bulls aren't, so it makes great sense for both sides to swap Curry for something. Ignoring the filler for salary cap purposes, Curry for Sweetney, a first, 2 seconds and the chance to swap a first is a lot more than the Bulls would have got if Curry just walked. And this was the only way the Knicks could get a centre like Curry due to their cap situation, so it could be a bargain for them if he turns out to be healthy and motivated to prove something.

It will be interesting to see what Chicago does trade wise this year. They now have a lot of picks to go with their expiring contract (which now becomes TT instead of AD), as well as some good young talent they can throw in. Will they do a big S&T for a star before the dealine? Will they trade up in the draft with their picks? Will they just let TT expire and go shoping in free agency instead? Interesting times ahead.

Wed Oct 05, 2005 8:52 pm

While I'm still not overly sold on the notion that this trade was a good idea - my knee-jerk reaction is to say it's a bad move on Chicago's part - I can see more good in it after further thought.

For example, I was under the impression that Tim Thomas was signed for several more years whereas I now see his ridiculous contract will come off the books at the end of the season. Obviously that equals cap space which doesn't always equal success in the free agent market and then success the following year, but given the Bulls are starting to build a good young core it's a nice bonus. I suppose I'll give my support to Thomas as long as he's a Bull but I have to admit I've never been a huge fan of his, save for a nice dunk over Terry Cummings in his rookie year.

Giving up AD isn't such a bad idea in the long run, though his stability as a solid veteran and decent production last year are being gambled on a player that has shown promise but is still mostly potential in Sweetney. I guess the bottom line is, they'll have to try and make it work. Kudos to Paxson for snaring some draft picks as well.

On the Knicks side, they've made a really good deal so long as Curry's health holds up and it'll look even better if he starts fulfilling more of that potential. They're probably taking the bigger risk than Chicago right now but the balance will be tipped in their favour if Curry stays healthy and explodes.

I agree that it's hard to pick a winner in this trade because there's so many "what-ifs", though I am disappointed that Curry had to leave. After last year, it's a shame to see the boat rocked.

it's also being reported that Davis is expected to be cut by nyk and the bulls plan to resign him then. i think thomas will be traded


My pessimistic nature has me believing that's likely wishful thinking, though I'd love to see it happen. If that happens then I believe Chicago would have gotten the best out of the deal, at least until such time that Curry actually does become a Shaq-like force.

Thu Oct 06, 2005 3:35 am

Its_asdf wrote:New York, as usual, overpays a guy with a questionable heart problem/work ethic. Good job Isiah, we salute you.


A Knick fan at another site had a great quote - "Who's heart goes out first, Brown's or Curry's?" I think Brown lost his mind signing up for this torture.

Thu Oct 06, 2005 8:45 am

davis will come back to the bulls. under the new cba, "gary payton" move requires davis to be on the knicks for 30 days then of course he'll have to clear waivers to get on the bulls

then the bulls could use LLE or vet exception to net him

Thu Oct 06, 2005 9:49 am

I've little doubt the Bulls got the best part of this deal:

.From the games I've seen this past years I've this notion of Curry as being a vastly overrated player.

.The Bulls kept Chandler, which will be the next defensive all-star;

.The Bulls will have a heck of cap space to snatch a proper player;

.They got rid of a player that does little else other than scoring, despite having physical gifts to be a bully in the paint;

.He's only efective for 2 quarters due to poor conditioning;

.He's a 6ft11 , 300lbs player that doesn't rebound :?

.The Bulls don't need him, as they were 1 jumpshot away from outlasting the bullets in last year's playoffs - without him;

.Mike Sweetney will be a Decent Player;

.Just think of this: would you rather have Al Jefferson or Eddie Curry on your team?

For the sake of comparison check the progression of Curry and Chandler stats wise:

Chandler:

YEAR TEAM G GS MPG FG% 3P% FT% OFF DEF RPG APG SPG BPG TO PF PPG
01-02 CHI 71 31 19.6 .497 .000 .604 1.6 3.2 4.8 .8 .39 1.31 1.39 2.50 6.1
02-03 CHI 75 68 24.4 .531 .000 .608 2.3 4.6 6.9 1.0 .49 1.41 1.80 2.90 9.2
03-04 CHI 35 8 22.3 .424 .000 .669 2.3 5.4 7.7 .7 .49 1.23 1.09 2.50 6.1
04-05 CHI 80 10 27.4 .494 .000 .673 3.3 6.4 9.7 .8 .86 1.76 1.48 3.40 8.0


Curry

YEAR TEAM G GS MPG FG% 3P% FT% OFF DEF RPG APG SPG BPG TO PF PPG
01-02 CHI 72 31 16.0 .501 .000 .656 1.5 2.2 3.8 .3 .22 .74 .96 2.40 6.7
02-03 CHI 81 48 19.4 .585 .000 .624 1.4 2.9 4.4 .5 .22 .77 1.69 2.80 10.5
03-04 CHI 73 63 29.5 .496 1.000 .671 2.0 4.2 6.2 .9 .33 1.14 2.42 3.50 14.7
04-05 CHI 63 60 28.7 .538 .000 .720 1.8 3.5 5.4 .6 .33 .92 2.59 3.20 16.1

Curry's scoring average increased as did his playing time... Not surprising. But very little progress elsewhere.

Thu Oct 06, 2005 11:41 am

Your use of the period key is intriguing.

under the new cba, "gary payton" move requires davis to be on the knicks for 30 days then of course he'll have to clear waivers to get on the bulls


Hmm, wonder if there's still time to go and get that Antonio Davis Knicks jersey.

Thu Oct 06, 2005 12:57 pm

And that brings us to *off-topic*: Who got a Sheed jersey in Atlanta?
Post a reply