[Q] wrote:Able to bring Cain
Andrew wrote:I'd rather have floating major champions that can appear on both or either show, perhaps with an exclusive singles belt (US and IC, for example) as the top belt for each brand while the big belt is the champion of the entire company. It'd be a similar model to the old territory days, which I think makes the most sense; especially when one of the world titles is a complete joke and permanently damaged from how it's been booked.
Andrew wrote:Also, apparently Dana Warrior, the Ultimate Warrior's widow, has a prominent position on the writing staff.
Rhodes also touted the company’s plans to emphasize analytics as part of the show.
“One thing we really strongly want to present is wins and losses mattering again in pro wrestling. That takes more than the W and the L column,” he said. “We’re talking about percentage of times someone loses to this particular maneuver, percentages against somebody of this height, a whole by-the-numbers approach that really intrigues me. It’s not a cornerstone of AEW necessarily but it’s a great peripheral element we’re working on and that’s going to be exclusive to us.”
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 10 guests