Main Site | Forum | Rules | Downloads | Wiki | Features | Podcast

NLSC Forum

Like real basketball, as well as basketball video games? Talk about the NBA, NCAA, and other professional and amateur basketball leagues here.
Post a reply

Da Bobcats

Thu Aug 19, 2004 10:56 am

From what they have done so far,lets gets some predictions on theyre record.

Im gonna say 25-67
reasonable
some talent is gonna show from Wallace and Kapono

Thu Aug 19, 2004 2:03 pm

not even that, i got 13-69 cause that was clevelands and denvers recored the year they didn't have their rookie stars. i don't think an expansion team can do better.

yo

Thu Aug 19, 2004 2:09 pm

29-53

Thu Aug 19, 2004 2:24 pm

Donte Thomas wrote:not even that, i got 13-69 cause that was clevelands and denvers recored the year they didn't have their rookie stars. i don't think an expansion team can do better.

I'm thinking around that record as well...

Thu Aug 19, 2004 2:35 pm

well look, in the nfl, the houston texans were in expansion team the year before last i think, the worst record was about 3-13, the texans did 1-15. at that rate, they would reach 29 wins would be in 29 seasons, last year they did 3 wins, so basically the teams have to produce more before getting to the 30s. and anyway if they did thata good, they're only about 13 games outta the playoffs, so i think the 28 win area is impossible for an expansion team.

Thu Aug 19, 2004 3:17 pm

Donte Thomas wrote:well look, in the nfl, the houston texans were in expansion team the year before last i think, the worst record was about 3-13, the texans did 1-15. at that rate, they would reach 29 wins would be in 29 seasons, last year they did 3 wins, so basically the teams have to produce more before getting to the 30s. and anyway if they did thata good, they're only about 13 games outta the playoffs, so i think the 28 win area is impossible for an expansion team.
All though it would be tough for the Texans to get 29 wins playing in a 16 game schedule. :roll:

15 sounds about right to me. A weakness of expansions usually seems to be defence. Someone always steps it up on offence and averages 18+ (Gerald Wallace?), although on defence they can be troubled. This team has Emeka though which gives it a little better chance IMO. Plus Orlando, Atlanta, and Washingotn are in their division.

Thu Aug 19, 2004 3:20 pm

Donte Thomas wrote:well look, in the nfl, the houston texans were in expansion team the year before last i think, the worst record was about 3-13, the texans did 1-15. at that rate, they would reach 29 wins would be in 29 seasons, last year they did 3 wins, so basically the teams have to produce more before getting to the 30s. and anyway if they did thata good, they're only about 13 games outta the playoffs, so i think the 28 win area is impossible for an expansion team.
All though it would be tough for the Texans to get 29 wins playing in a 16 game schedule. :roll:

15 sounds about right to me. A weakness of expansions usually seems to be defence. Someone always steps it up on offence and averages 18+ (Gerald Wallace?), although on defence they can be troubled. This team has Emeka though which gives it a little better chance IMO. Plus Orlando, Atlanta, and Washingotn are in their division.

Thu Aug 19, 2004 4:30 pm

that hepls them out, but NJ, DET, IND, MIL, BOS, and others are in their conference, and SAS, MIA, SAC, NOH, LAL, LAC,MEM, :D MIN :D, are in the NBA. So it will be real tough to get 25. ANd the 29 win in 16 game season, i know it would be hard, but i meant 29 franchise wins total vs. 29 single season wins for Bobbys.

Thu Aug 19, 2004 4:31 pm

Donte Thomas wrote:well look, in the nfl, the houston texans were in expansion team the year before last i think, the worst record was about 3-13, the texans did 1-15. at that rate, they would reach 29 wins would be in 29 seasons, last year they did 3 wins, so basically the teams have to produce more before getting to the 30s. and anyway if they did thata good, they're only about 13 games outta the playoffs, so i think the 28 win area is impossible for an expansion team.

The NFL is the NFL. This is the NBA we're talking about. Two different processes. For many, many reasons. You can't compare the Texans to the Bobcats. Why? Let's start with the coaching. The Texans have Dom Capers as their head coach and Chris Palmer as their OC. Palmer was coach of the Browns and Capers of the Panthers when they started their exhibition seasons. That is a ton of expansion experience, to add on to Capers' other experience as DC with various teams beforehand. Yes, Bickerstaff is experienced (and retarded) but not nearly as much as Palmer and Capers are (I mean, Palmer + Capers is more experienced, but less stupid in their statements).

Secondly, the NFL is much, much deeper due to the design of the game. There are 7 rounds to the draft, not 2, and there's even a supplemental draft sometime in the summer (forget). The NFL also has 22 players on the field at the same time and most players only play on one side of the ball. In addition, again, due to differences in the games (which doesn't just include on the field, but also off the field, ie, monetary issues, draft, FA's, etc), the Texans received the #1 overall while the Bobcats received the #4 (lenient considering the Raptors and Grizz got the #7 and 8). Also, during the expansion draft, the Texans were able to take older, albeit players with large contract (like Coleman, Boselli, Glenn, Payne, Walker off the top of my head). They still had a very, very young team, but unlike the Bobcats who were "handicapped" by a 29 million cap, the Texans had the luxury to take some of these players. Also, the full salary of players when they are cut by a NFL team is not paid to the player or responsible for the team, only a portion (unlike the NBA).

I could go on and on about the differences between an expansion team in the NFL and the NBA (the NFL is easier on the expansion team as well IMO). But I think I've made the point pretty clear already. A better, although still flawed comparison would be to the Raptors and the Grizz. However, the Bobcats had a much, much more talented pool of players (also younger - guys like Kapono, Wallace, Slay, Fizer, Hunter, Bell, etc) to chose from and were given a higher spot in the draft.
Last edited by FanOfAll on Thu Aug 19, 2004 4:41 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Thu Aug 19, 2004 4:38 pm

i see what you're saying. i get your point.

Thu Aug 19, 2004 4:45 pm

FanOfAll wrote: but unlike the Bobcats who were "handicapped" by a 29 million cap, the Texans had the luxury to take some of these players. Also, the full salary of players when they are cut by a NFL team is not paid to the player or responsible for the team, only a portion (unlike the NBA).
I forgot about that too. If you give a player a bonus in his contract you pay a portion of that as a cap penalty the next year. If somehow you sign a player without a bonus, even if it's for 10 million, you can release without any penalty.

Thu Aug 19, 2004 5:07 pm

oooooooooooooooohhhhhhhhhhhhhh, so say if cavs were to cut lebron, his $_ _ million signing bonus wouldn't even matter even with the salary cap? and they would only have to pay like 17% of his bonus or salary cap.

Thu Aug 19, 2004 5:35 pm

The Bobcats will not win over 20 games this season. I mean they're planning on starting Jason Hart at PG :shock: Their swingmen will be Gerald Wallace and Jason Kapono :shock: Okafor will be the lone bright spot. They're not going to sign any free agent even though they had what $7 M of cap space after the expansion draft.

They're definately going for the #1 next season. Just look at their current center quality, and the center prospects of the next draft. There are a lot of talented Euro centers going to be available, even if they don't get the #1, a top 5 pick will likely give them a good C for the future to team up with Meka.

Thu Aug 19, 2004 6:33 pm

I, too, would be surprised if the Bobcats won more than 20 games their first season.

Thu Aug 19, 2004 9:14 pm

There is no way that they will get 20 wins if their starplayer is Gerald Wallace or Emeka Okafor....NO WAY!!!

12 wins if they try.

Thu Aug 19, 2004 10:12 pm

They should've gone after Rafer Alston.

Thu Aug 19, 2004 11:18 pm

I think they'll quite possibly challenge for the worst record ever, but you never know...

Thu Aug 19, 2004 11:40 pm

They will probably surprise some teams.
most of these guys are in teh last year of their contracts... = Breakout year. :)


They won't have the worst record because they don't have the biggest quitter in the NBA mr tracy mcgrady on their team :)

Fri Aug 20, 2004 12:20 am

12-15 wins....unless they trade some draft picks to the Nets for Richard Jefferson

Fri Aug 20, 2004 12:48 am

Matt wrote:12-15 wins....unless they trade some draft picks to the Nets for Richard Jefferson

The Nets should be all over that. Jefferson is a disgrace to basketball. He sucks so bad, I can feel the draft over here!

Fri Aug 20, 2004 3:20 am

Donte Thomas wrote:oooooooooooooooohhhhhhhhhhhhhh, so say if cavs were to cut lebron, his $_ _ million signing bonus wouldn't even matter even with the salary cap? and they would only have to pay like 17% of his bonus or salary cap.

I believe his was talking about football. Front loaded contracts don't happen all that often in basketball, while in football, they almost always have a signing bonus for starter quality players.

The Nets should be all over that. Jefferson is a disgrace to basketball. He sucks so bad, I can feel the draft over here!

:?

Fri Aug 20, 2004 5:19 pm

FanOfAll wrote:
The Nets should be all over that. Jefferson is a disgrace to basketball. He sucks so bad, I can feel the draft over here!

:?

:?

Fri Aug 20, 2004 7:40 pm

not counting the Olympics, Jefferson is a good player. I'll say he's gonna make the All-Star team next season

Fri Aug 20, 2004 7:54 pm

The way Kidd makes Jefferson look good only adds to Kidd's legacy.

Fri Aug 20, 2004 8:46 pm

I'd go for 16 wins for the Bobcats ; and i don't think they'll become the worst team of the league, i guess they will build a roster like Utah had last year, so a good team chemistry could prevent them from disaster
Post a reply