by koberulz on Mon Mar 10, 2014 3:40 pm
No idea why "there was a swerve" is in spoiler tags...not only is it entirely lacking in specificity, it's TNA, so the fact that there was a swerve is hardly a surprise.
Not that it necessarily counts as a swerve; I could see it coming after Impact (the one negative of TNA's rebranding a while back: no longer being able to call it "iMPACT!") a couple of weeks ago. Okay, so he elbows MVP in the face, but everyone just assumed he was on Roode's team even after he insisted he wouldn't be if he didn't get half Roode's winnings, which he never got. So of course he turned.
*checks results*
Wait, it wasn't him? What the fuck, TNA? You have the perfect setup for an entirely sensible "swerve", and you go with that?
Speaking of sensible swerves, I thought the wrong team went over on Raw after Rollins walked out on the Shield. Rollins and Ambrose go nuts, beat the Wyatts, Reigns gets even more over, Rollins comes back in like his move worked and they can work as a team now. Then you can run exactly the same angle you ran on SmackDown. It opens up any combination of two-on-one, or a complete three-way feud, or even the team sticking together because seriously, why are you even breaking them up right now? You're not exactly wanting for singles guys, assuming Cena, Orton and Batista aren't going anywhere, and I doubt anyone would complain if they went at the Wyatts a few more times.
To return to TNA, though, and respond to your contention that their TV of late has been better than that PPV: the elimination six-man tag. That is all.