Three pointers
Tue Jul 27, 2004 8:07 am
In your last rosters everyone seems to be a three point specialist.
There are 33 players with rating 80 or over. 33!!!
I think the 3P ratings should be lower overall. A too high rating really changes the game, specially if there are too many players like that.
Just some comments
Lenard 89, is a bit overrated. Well, he is an allstar three point winner, but 84, 85 should be enough
Peeler 87 - ???
Hoiberg, Jacobsen 85 - ratings in previous rosters where more suitable, they're both good shooters but not really a threat
Bowen 85 - is he still that good?
Szczerbiak, Turkoglu, Rice 84 - hmm, maybe... at least Hedo is not at 90 anymore
Cardinal 83 - hmm, fans certainlly think he is that good...
and so on...
Mckie 83 - an upgrade from 57 to 83?
There are 33 players with rating 80 or over. 33!!!
I think the 3P ratings should be lower overall. A too high rating really changes the game, specially if there are too many players like that.
Just some comments
Lenard 89, is a bit overrated. Well, he is an allstar three point winner, but 84, 85 should be enough
Peeler 87 - ???
Hoiberg, Jacobsen 85 - ratings in previous rosters where more suitable, they're both good shooters but not really a threat
Bowen 85 - is he still that good?
Szczerbiak, Turkoglu, Rice 84 - hmm, maybe... at least Hedo is not at 90 anymore
Cardinal 83 - hmm, fans certainlly think he is that good...
and so on...
Mckie 83 - an upgrade from 57 to 83?
Tue Jul 27, 2004 11:24 am
All of those suggestions were made to me specifically. I can lower some ratings though. 