Draft Lottery Results

Like real basketball, as well as basketball video games? Talk about the NBA, NCAA, and other professional and amateur basketball leagues here.

Draft Lottery Results

Postby EGarrett on Thu May 27, 2004 10:31 am

T-Mac + Okafor...not bad.

1. Orlando
2. LA Clippers
3. Chicago
4. Charlotte
5. Washington
6. Atlanta
7. Phoenix
8. Toronto
9. Philadelphia
10. Cleveland
11. Golden State
12. Seattle
13. Portland
14. Utah
User avatar
EGarrett
 
Posts: 1248
Joined: Tue Nov 12, 2002 2:28 am
Location: CA

Postby Jackal on Thu May 27, 2004 10:43 am

Huh? Do they get to pick in this order or are these the teams with the highest chances to land the number one pick? Isn't there supposed to be a whole lottery kind of thing with balls?

+

If the Magic do get Okafor, I think they should play him at the PF, get rid of Howard + Gooden for a decent Center. (Yeah, alot of those around. :roll: , silly me.)
User avatar
Jackal
 
Posts: 14877
Joined: Fri Mar 21, 2003 2:59 am

Postby EGarrett on Thu May 27, 2004 10:46 am

The lottery completed about 30 seconds before I typed that post.

That is the draft order.
User avatar
EGarrett
 
Posts: 1248
Joined: Tue Nov 12, 2002 2:28 am
Location: CA

Postby Jackal on Thu May 27, 2004 10:52 am

Oh, ok, I didnt know.

Last year it was pretty publicised on NBA.com and everything that's why I was a bit confused, my bad. :oops:
User avatar
Jackal
 
Posts: 14877
Joined: Fri Mar 21, 2003 2:59 am

Postby Mazzocchi on Thu May 27, 2004 10:54 am

cool, magic #1 :) Charlote #4? i thought they automatically got like #1, #2 cuz theyre an expansion team
(and that still boathers me, the whole Bobcats thing, why does Charlotte get a team after they lost the Hornets?)
User avatar
Mazzocchi
Resident Mavericks Fan (Since 1994)
 
Posts: 3132
Joined: Sat Oct 25, 2003 6:00 am
Location: The Darkside Of The Moon

Postby Jackal on Thu May 27, 2004 10:57 am

They did not "lose" the Hornets, the Hornets management decided that Charlotte was no good for them anymore. No one was going to watch their games, so they didnt make money. Charlotte didnt do anything wrong. After the Hornets left, some dude felt that Charlotte is a basketball city, so he asked for a team in Charlotte. The Bobcats.
User avatar
Jackal
 
Posts: 14877
Joined: Fri Mar 21, 2003 2:59 am

Postby Mazzocchi on Thu May 27, 2004 10:59 am

Psycho Jackal wrote:They did not "lose" the Hornets, the Hornets management decided that Charlotte was no good for them anymore. No one was going to watch their games, so they didnt make money. Charlotte didnt do anything wrong. After the Hornets left, some dude felt that Charlotte is a basketball city, so he asked for a team in Charlotte. The Bobcats.

o.......... ok........... my bad?
What will theyre jerseys look like?
The Ones In NBA Live? The Ones IN NBA Ballers? Or Ones Totally Different?
User avatar
Mazzocchi
Resident Mavericks Fan (Since 1994)
 
Posts: 3132
Joined: Sat Oct 25, 2003 6:00 am
Location: The Darkside Of The Moon

Postby Colin on Thu May 27, 2004 2:30 pm

the only change between the draft order and the probabilities is the Clippers moving from 5 to 2 and bumping Chicago and Washington to 3 and 5 respectively. I wanted the Suns to get a better pick. :(
C#
Image
Pretty Flaco
User avatar
Colin
 
Posts: 5913
Joined: Thu Mar 06, 2003 7:02 am
Location: Van-City

Postby fgrep15 on Thu May 27, 2004 2:33 pm

I'm dissapointed that the Wizards went down to 5th because this likely means no Deng, maybe trade out first pick and Dixon for Deng. But I am happy the Clippers got 2nd, I'm not too sure what we'll do with it though, maybe trade the pick down to get a PG, and a decent rotation player.

The Raptors stayed the same, still hoping for Harris or Gordon.

Orlando deserves that pick, and I had Chicago going lower, but a little too low, it's all good, I think Chicago is a litte happy, they likely didn't want another high school big man and the decision would have been hard with the 2nd pick.
CP3 | Brand | Arenas | Calderon
Raptors | Wizards | Clippers
User avatar
fgrep15
 
Posts: 3172
Joined: Mon Nov 03, 2003 1:43 am
Location: Canada

Postby Colin on Thu May 27, 2004 2:36 pm

the Clippers are going to take another power forward like always fgrep. :roll: :lol: Hopefuly they get a pg, because lets face it, Marko Jaric shouldn't be starting at pg.
C#
Image
Pretty Flaco
User avatar
Colin
 
Posts: 5913
Joined: Thu Mar 06, 2003 7:02 am
Location: Van-City

Postby Matt on Thu May 27, 2004 4:30 pm

Looks like T-Mac could be staying. This gives the Magic a big chance to improve, something that McGrady wants. I guess they'll take Okafor. If they can get rid of Howard or Gooden and get a PG or SG that can shoot and get bout 15ppg things should be good
Image
User avatar
Matt
 
Posts: 7236
Joined: Mon Oct 07, 2002 6:48 pm
Location: Australia

Postby fgrep15 on Thu May 27, 2004 4:34 pm

colin826 wrote:the Clippers are going to take another power forward like always fgrep. :roll: :lol: Hopefuly they get a pg, because lets face it, Marko Jaric shouldn't be starting at pg.


Please NO, Brand and Wilcox, no more PF's, the Clippers will likely take Dwight Howard, then trade their pick for a PG and something else or trade down for a PG. The could also take Gordon, Harris or Livingston at 2, but I don't want Livingston, he could take too long to develop, and by the time he's good Baylor decided not to give out money anymore, and Harris and Gordon shouldn't go that high.

I'm happy you also know that Jaric shouldn't start at PG.
CP3 | Brand | Arenas | Calderon
Raptors | Wizards | Clippers
User avatar
fgrep15
 
Posts: 3172
Joined: Mon Nov 03, 2003 1:43 am
Location: Canada

Postby Arcane on Thu May 27, 2004 4:56 pm

the dude who owns the bobcats is the guy who owns bet (black entertainment tv)
User avatar
Arcane
The NLSC's Jim Jefferies
NLSC Team Member
 
Posts: 7077
Joined: Tue Jun 10, 2003 12:00 am
Location: Brisbane, QLD

Postby Andrew on Thu May 27, 2004 5:01 pm

Genocide wrote:cool, magic #1 :) Charlote #4? i thought they automatically got like #1, #2 cuz theyre an expansion team


They're restricted to fourth this year, but they'll be able to select first overall if they win the lottery from 2005 onwards. The league introduced restrictions on expansion teams after Orlando had two consecutive first overall picks (1992: Shaq; 1993: Webber, traded for Penny) after only a couple of years in the league. They also modified the lottery so that teams with poorer records had a greater chance of winning the first pick.

The Grizzlies and Raptors were not able to select first for their first couple of years in the league. I believe Toronto actually won the 1996 lottery, but was forced to pick second (the Grizz picked third), with Philadelphia being awarded the top pick (that became Allen Iverson).

3. Chicago


Not bad, I guess. 20 years ago the Bulls got the third pick and managed to select a fairly decent player...I don't think lightning will strike twice though. :(
User avatar
Andrew
Retro Basketball Gamer
Administrator
 
Posts: 115080
Joined: Thu Aug 22, 2002 8:51 pm
Location: Australia

Postby FanOfAll on Fri May 28, 2004 10:20 am

I believe the year the Raptors and the Grizz came into the league, they got the 7th and 8th picks. And considering the Raptors made the playoffs a few seasons later, getting the 7th pick wasn't bad. Unlike in the NFL, you're not at a disadvantage when you're and expansion team.

I highly doubt the Clippers will take another PF, considering they've already spent 3 first rounders are 3 PF's (if you count the one traded away for Brand). Deng is looking more and more likely esp considering the fact that they won't re-sign (or are highly unlikely to) Q Richardson.

I think Orlando is a great, great place for Okafor to go to. He can really be the big presence in the middle Orlando has lacked for so long and there's not much pressure on him offensively to produce, so he can slowly develop his offensive game.
FanOfAll
 
Posts: 930
Joined: Tue Oct 28, 2003 11:44 am

Postby MaD_hAND1e on Fri May 28, 2004 10:38 am

Psycho Jackal wrote:Oh, ok, I didnt know.

Last year it was pretty publicised on NBA.com and everything that's why I was a bit confused, my bad. :oops:


Yea, i guess last year was the lottery for LeBron, which meant whoever got the first pick got LeBron. The fact that he was such a coveted player made the draft lottery so publicised last year... but this year, there isn't really a player who stands out as being a lot better than anyone else.
User avatar
MaD_hAND1e
 
Posts: 1271
Joined: Mon Nov 11, 2002 5:09 pm


Return to NBA & Basketball

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests