Graphik

by **Cool2Fool** on Tue Aug 26, 2008 11:30 am

06

vs
09

Which looks better? Obviously 06 >.< Why is graphik downgraded?

by **Patr1ck** on Tue Aug 26, 2008 12:19 pm

One reason might be that they used all the power the 360 had for graphics in 06 to make a nextgen-looking game. I don't see what's so bad about 09's graphics when compared to 06. Kevin Garnett may look worse then he did in 06(atleast in that photo), but I think the overall graphics have improved since then.

by **huddy187** on Tue Aug 26, 2008 1:03 pm

09 looks the best but i liked 06 faces better.........some of them :mrgreen:

by **Cool2Fool** on Tue Aug 26, 2008 1:06 pm

really? I thought 06 has better lighting,texture,model,sweat,jersey,expression and overall graphic. 08 and 09 looks cartoony to me atleast thats not the next gen graphic I expect to look like...
Very next gen looking

09

far from photorealistic,

by **huddy187** on Tue Aug 26, 2008 2:10 pm

nevermind 06 look great the only bad thing was the current gen animations

by **Beatboxer** on Tue Aug 26, 2008 3:52 pm

Pdub wrote:One reason might be that they used all the power the 360 had for graphics in 06 to make a nextgen-looking game.

Another reason why they should release this game for the PC : adjustable graphics and no hardware limits.

BTW, 06 graphics are absolutely better than 09's. Jerseys looks much nice in 06, but not shorts. Lighting is also incredibly realistic in 06.

by **mr2ksports** on Tue Aug 26, 2008 10:09 pm

06 has better graphics as i can see but 09 has better shadows look at t-mac 09 vs kg 06.

try comparing 2k graphics.. let's see what would people say :mrgreen:

by **huddy187** on Wed Aug 27, 2008 6:44 am

mr2ksports wrote:06 has better graphics as i can see but 09 has better shadows look at t-mac 09 vs kg 06.

try comparing 2k graphics.. let's see what would people say

well 2k current gen graphics were good but not really next gen

Graphik

Graphik

Who is online