X's Dynasty - KNICKS IN COLOUR [DYNASTY OVER *25/10/05*]

Tell stories based on your franchise and career mode games here.

Postby The X on Fri Oct 07, 2005 10:08 am

thanks guys....busy weekend ahead and it's gonna get really hot so won't sit in front of the computer....have Monday off work so you should finally get an update then :roll:
User avatar
The X
is
NLSC Team Member
 
Posts: 11499
Joined: Mon Nov 08, 2004 9:21 pm
Location: Brisbane

Postby ShAuN on Fri Oct 07, 2005 10:26 am

Sweet cant wait. check out my Heat Dynasty looks alot better compare to the pthers, thats what other people said
User avatar
ShAuN
 
Posts: 2349
Joined: Fri Jul 29, 2005 1:47 pm
Location: Massachusetts

Postby brad feet on Sat Oct 08, 2005 1:15 pm

ohhh too bad X...... anyway, hope you fix it...... by the way, your first game is against who?
User avatar
brad feet
 
Posts: 752
Joined: Wed Nov 17, 2004 5:25 pm
Location: Melbourne, Australia

Postby The X on Mon Oct 10, 2005 11:35 am

KNICKS TAKE A HEARTY GAMBLE ON CURRY

Today the New York Knicks announced that they would be sending Tim Thomas, Michael Sweetney and a conditional 1st Round selection (in either 2006 or 2007) to the Chicago Bulls for Eddy Curry and Antonio Davis. As part of the deal, Eddy Curry was signed to a 6 year, $60 million deal.

Whilst on paper it looks like a great deal for the Knicks, the risk they are assuming is high. Not only have they taken on the potential future heart problems of Curry, but they have given him an uninsured, long-term deal. If Curry reaches anywhere near his potential then this deal is a major coup, otherwise it puts the franchise back another couple of seasons. Thomas and Sweetney were both due to come off the team's cap in the next year or two, but now that money is allocated to a long-term deal to Curry. The 1st Round pick is conditional and will be conferred to the Bulls either in the 2006 or 2007 draft year. The deal was a must for the Bulls who will open up more cap space in the next year or two to be spent elsewhere.


UPDATED DEPTH CHARTS

After their trade with the Bulls, the Knicks updated depth chart is as follows:

C- Eddy Curry/Jerome James/Antonio Davis
PF- Maurice Taylor/Malik Rose/Channing Frye/David Lee
SF- Quentin Richardson/Trevor Ariza
SG- Jamal Crawford/Allan Houston/Penny Hardaway
PG- Stephon Marbury/Nate Robinson/Jamison Brewer


NB: Starters will likely vary from these depth charts
Last edited by The X on Mon Oct 10, 2005 2:37 pm, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
The X
is
NLSC Team Member
 
Posts: 11499
Joined: Mon Nov 08, 2004 9:21 pm
Location: Brisbane

Postby Kobe101 on Mon Oct 10, 2005 11:44 am

Good recap. Roster looks deep. (Y)
Image
"As long as their is people their will always be war."
User avatar
Kobe101
 
Posts: 1463
Joined: Tue Jun 07, 2005 4:19 am
Location: LA California

Postby The X on Mon Oct 10, 2005 11:49 am

yep, roster is deep but the cap is deeply in the shite too (N)
User avatar
The X
is
NLSC Team Member
 
Posts: 11499
Joined: Mon Nov 08, 2004 9:21 pm
Location: Brisbane

Postby Fresh8 on Mon Oct 10, 2005 6:03 pm

X, Starbury at the 2!!!
User avatar
Fresh8
The poster formerly known as Sit
 
Posts: 14872
Joined: Mon Nov 11, 2002 5:19 pm

Postby cklitsie on Mon Oct 10, 2005 7:01 pm

Good looking roster, nice signing with Brewer too, I like him. :D
Anyone saw his dunk vs. ATL? :shock:
User avatar
cklitsie
 
Posts: 6511
Joined: Sun May 11, 2003 3:02 am

Postby Jugs on Mon Oct 10, 2005 7:20 pm

is the dunk on video? ceekay?

I love brewer, he's da pwn... he better get playing time X

Nice roster
Jugs
 
Posts: 7442
Joined: Wed Mar 16, 2005 9:32 pm
Location: Geelong, Australia

Postby mp3 on Tue Oct 11, 2005 5:00 am

cklitsie wrote:Good looking roster, nice signing with Brewer too, I like him. :D
Anyone saw his dunk vs. ATL? :shock:


Nbatv's number 1 play of the day if iam not mistaken :)
User avatar
mp3
 
Posts: 5328
Joined: Mon Feb 24, 2003 12:45 am

Postby Its_asdf on Tue Oct 11, 2005 7:48 am

PF- Maurice Taylor/Malik Rose/Channing Frye/David Lee


Mo Taylor over Frye and Lee? That's a definite no-no. :scold:
User avatar
Its_asdf
I'm kind of a big deal.
 
Posts: 5462
Joined: Sat Mar 19, 2005 4:53 am
Location: Under a Rock in Canada

Postby G XIII on Tue Oct 11, 2005 8:45 am

Yeah man, good Luck. Go NY!!
Image
User avatar
G XIII
 
Posts: 2
Joined: Tue Oct 11, 2005 7:27 am
Location: NYC , NY

Postby Abctest123 on Tue Oct 11, 2005 9:35 am

why not let big frye be infront of malik rose? i havent watched malik rose play much, so i dont know much about him, but i would let the rookie have enough minutes over a below average veteran.
User avatar
Abctest123
 
Posts: 1610
Joined: Fri Sep 02, 2005 12:25 pm

Postby The X on Tue Oct 11, 2005 10:14 am

Sit wrote:X, Starbury at the 2!!!

nah, I'm actually using Starbury as a superstar playmaker....it appears Larry Brown has gotten into his head, but for how long?!? :roll: But Marbury is getting some time at the 2, depends on matchups and so on....

cklitsie wrote:Good looking roster, nice signing with Brewer too, I like him. :D
Anyone saw his dunk vs. ATL? :shock:

yep, I thought Brewer was a nice realistic signing....I didn't see that dunk unfortunately but like you and Jugs, I seem to gravitate towards him :?

Jugs wrote:is the dunk on video? ceekay?

I love brewer, he's da pwn... he better get playing time X

Nice roster

he's my token guy waving his towel so I don't know how much time he will get....you better hope for injuries or trades to get him on the floor more :wink:

Its_asdf wrote:
PF- Maurice Taylor/Malik Rose/Channing Frye/David Lee


Mo Taylor over Frye and Lee? That's a definite no-no. :scold:

that depth chart was before I was playing....Mo Taylor has yet to see one minute of PT through 3 games....and he is behind Frye in depth charts at the moment....as for Lee, he's a fav of mine, but I have him on the IR training up his D....

G XIII wrote:Yeah man, good Luck. Go NY!!

cheers

drunkmofo123 wrote:why not let big frye be infront of malik rose? i havent watched malik rose play much, so i dont know much about him, but i would let the rookie have enough minutes over a below average veteran.

he is ahead of him....Malik Rose is on the IR now :twisted:

my updated roster lineup is available on the 2nd post of page 1 of this thread....at the moment I am rolling with a starting lineup of curry, davis, q, crawford and marbury....I am starting Antonio Davis because I needed some more rebounding in my starting lineup....damn, I could really use JYD right about now :roll:

I'm still learning the game and it's intracacies, and the makeup of the Knicks' team and how to best utilise each player....it will take time and experimentation....I might also look at clearing the logjam at PF....it's not an easy roster to deal with in a "realistic" way, but I'll give it my best shot :wink:
User avatar
The X
is
NLSC Team Member
 
Posts: 11499
Joined: Mon Nov 08, 2004 9:21 pm
Location: Brisbane

Postby Kemp on Tue Oct 11, 2005 1:24 pm

I know that you want to start Davis at PF but the Knicks frontcourt starters is a bit weak on defence, there are no shot blocker. So I would suggest you start James at C, and Curry at PF. James can both rebound and block shot. What do you think?
Image
User avatar
Kemp
 
Posts: 929
Joined: Fri Jul 01, 2005 3:51 pm

Postby Jackie Kong on Tue Oct 11, 2005 1:53 pm

Kemp wrote:I know that you want to start Davis at PF but the Knicks frontcourt starters is a bit weak on defence, there are no shot blocker. So I would suggest you start James at C, and Curry at PF. James can both rebound and block shot. What do you think?


Here is my thought. Start Frye and Curry. Move Richardson to Sg.

Then, try to work out a deal for Josh Smith involving Crawford. You will obviously have to involve Nate Robinson and/or Ariza and/or Lee.

After i think you would look great.

A lineup of:
C- Frye
PF- Curry
SF- Smith
SG- Richardson
PG- Marbury

is sick and Josh Smith provides the blocking ability needed.
User avatar
Jackie Kong
 
Posts: 527
Joined: Mon Oct 03, 2005 5:18 am

Postby The X on Tue Oct 11, 2005 4:44 pm

Kemp wrote:I know that you want to start Davis at PF but the Knicks frontcourt starters is a bit weak on defence, there are no shot blocker. So I would suggest you start James at C, and Curry at PF. James can both rebound and block shot. What do you think?

I don't really want to start Davis, but you're right....we are a bit weak at the moment....we are deep but lack punch....Eddy's playing great at the mo thanks to Live's easy inside game in '06 :( I tried James and Curry together but it didn't work as both are poor rebounders....

marcusmirx wrote:
Kemp wrote:I know that you want to start Davis at PF but the Knicks frontcourt starters is a bit weak on defence, there are no shot blocker. So I would suggest you start James at C, and Curry at PF. James can both rebound and block shot. What do you think?


Here is my thought. Start Frye and Curry. Move Richardson to Sg.

Then, try to work out a deal for Josh Smith involving Crawford. You will obviously have to involve Nate Robinson and/or Ariza and/or Lee.

After i think you would look great.

A lineup of:
C- Frye
PF- Curry
SF- Smith
SG- Richardson
PG- Marbury

is sick and Josh Smith provides the blocking ability needed.

not looking at drastic changes yet....JC's playing great and seems to be a great sim player....getting like 30 per game at the mo although that will come down a lot....

will discuss this more as season and monthly recaps starting hitting this thread....
User avatar
The X
is
NLSC Team Member
 
Posts: 11499
Joined: Mon Nov 08, 2004 9:21 pm
Location: Brisbane

Postby AlwaysWhat,NeverWhy on Tue Oct 11, 2005 8:44 pm

Good thing trading for Curry... Keep up the good work, X!!! (Y) 8-)
User avatar
AlwaysWhat,NeverWhy
 
Posts: 5190
Joined: Thu Jan 27, 2005 11:30 am
Location: The Lodge...

Postby BOSS on Tue Oct 11, 2005 9:24 pm

Ye your probably gonna stick to the original roster then make trades during the season. No need to make a unrealestic trade jus yet. Good work man, hopefully Curry can help you guys alot.
User avatar
BOSS
 
Posts: 3889
Joined: Sat Mar 12, 2005 2:31 pm

Postby cklitsie on Tue Oct 11, 2005 10:13 pm

Jugs wrote:is the dunk on video? ceekay?
Well, I have it on vid but it's somewhere in the middle of a 42 minute 2004-05 mix. :wink:

Sorry for going off-topic X...
User avatar
cklitsie
 
Posts: 6511
Joined: Sun May 11, 2003 3:02 am

Postby The X on Tue Oct 11, 2005 10:54 pm

Nietzschean Pride wrote:Good thing trading for Curry... Keep up the good work, X!!! (Y) 8-)

no problemo mate :wink: looking forward to the Green dynasty....I'm expecting a lot of greenery from it :wink:

Initial D wrote:Ye your probably gonna stick to the original roster then make trades during the season. No need to make a unrealestic trade jus yet. Good work man, hopefully Curry can help you guys alot.

yep, will see how it goes....I wouldn't mind getting a 1st Round pick back....maybe I'll try and give Bulls back Davis and more for my 1st Rounder back....nah....who knows....definitely some work to do though....slowly but surely I guess....

cklitsie wrote:
Jugs wrote:is the dunk on video? ceekay?
Well, I have it on vid but it's somewhere in the middle of a 42 minute 2004-05 mix. :wink:

Sorry for going off-topic X...

:lol: like that's never happenned in my Bobcats' dynasty :lol:

I don't mind, it's all good :wink:
User avatar
The X
is
NLSC Team Member
 
Posts: 11499
Joined: Mon Nov 08, 2004 9:21 pm
Location: Brisbane

Postby VlaDiv on Wed Oct 12, 2005 1:05 am

I like your patient detail and the way you looked at contract situations. Very well done.
User avatar
VlaDiv
 
Posts: 332
Joined: Tue Jul 20, 2004 4:42 pm
Location: East Coast USA

Postby brad feet on Thu Oct 13, 2005 9:10 pm

i like the Hearty title thing... :lol: how is it doing with your dynasty bugs X? awesome line-up X.......
User avatar
brad feet
 
Posts: 752
Joined: Wed Nov 17, 2004 5:25 pm
Location: Melbourne, Australia

Postby kibaxx7 on Fri Oct 14, 2005 2:17 am

I would use this lineup:

C - James
PF - Curry
SF - Richardson
SG - Crawford
PG - Marbury
× Club Atlético Independiente. ×
× Watched:
Con Air (1997), The Phoenician Scheme (2025), The Brood (1979) ×
User avatar
kibaxx7
キバレンジャー
 
Posts: 12673
Joined: Fri Oct 08, 2004 11:34 am
Location: Buenos Aires, Argentina

Postby The X on Fri Oct 14, 2005 2:45 pm

VlaDiv wrote:I like your patient detail and the way you looked at contract situations. Very well done.

cheers, glad you liked it

brad feet wrote:i like the Hearty title thing... :lol: how is it doing with your dynasty bugs X? awesome line-up X.......

glad someone picked up on that pun :lol:

as for dynasty, yep it's underway bug-free, I'm 4 games through the season....another 3 to go in November and I'll do my recap for November....

Thierry Henry wrote:I would use this lineup:

C - James
PF - Curry
SF - Richardson
SG - Crawford
PG - Marbury

that was my opening night roster....although I've been changing it up....for my next game I am trying a James, Curry, Hardaway, Crawford and Marbury starting lineup....I've also run with a Curry, Davis, Q, Crawford and Marbury lineup....I just need to find a lineup that is strong on the boards as Detroit killed me by about 20 odd rebounds in my last game....
User avatar
The X
is
NLSC Team Member
 
Posts: 11499
Joined: Mon Nov 08, 2004 9:21 pm
Location: Brisbane

PreviousNext

Return to Stories from the Virtual Hardwood

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 5 guests