ATI all-in-wonder 7500 64 MB

Discussion about NBA Live 2003.

ATI all-in-wonder 7500 64 MB

Postby . on Wed Nov 13, 2002 8:28 am

I´m getting a new PC with ATI all-in-wonder 7500 64 MB.
I dont know anything about videocards but is this good to play NBA Live 2003?
.
 
Posts: 3706
Joined: Mon Nov 11, 2002 10:02 pm

Postby endofanera on Wed Nov 13, 2002 8:30 am

It will be decent, you shouldn't have any problem running the game in fairly high resolution with all the graphics features on.

What sort of processor do you have?
endofanera
 
Posts: 117
Joined: Wed Nov 13, 2002 1:31 am

Postby . on Wed Nov 13, 2002 8:36 am

AMD Athlon XP 2400
512 MB DDR
.
 
Posts: 3706
Joined: Mon Nov 11, 2002 10:02 pm

Postby fvdmc on Wed Nov 13, 2002 8:36 am

Should be just fine! :lol: But think how a 128MB ATI 9700 Pro would do :D

By the way... Vince and T-mac are way better than Kobe. :D Just my opinion.
User avatar
fvdmc
 
Posts: 224
Joined: Tue Nov 12, 2002 3:10 am

Postby . on Wed Nov 13, 2002 8:42 am

By the way... Vince and T-mac are way better than Kobe. Just my opinion.


Vince is no match against Kobe, ok......... U can compare T-Mac wit Kobe but not Vince!!!! :)
.
 
Posts: 3706
Joined: Mon Nov 11, 2002 10:02 pm

Postby endofanera on Wed Nov 13, 2002 8:53 am

With that processor and RAM you should be just fine. Sure the Radeon 9700 will be faster, but NBA Live doesn't take advantage of Pixel and Vertex Shaders so there wouldn't really be any noticable difference in image quality.
endofanera
 
Posts: 117
Joined: Wed Nov 13, 2002 1:31 am

Postby Bl@ck_Thorne on Wed Nov 13, 2002 9:25 am

hey i like to know if live will run faster on my computers
my system is:

AMD Athlon1.4ghz
geforce2 mx 400 64md updated drivers from nvidia website
win2000 pro sp3
40gig barracuda
391mb sdram pc-133
User avatar
Bl@ck_Thorne
 
Posts: 596
Joined: Wed Nov 13, 2002 9:18 am
Location: Phillipines

Postby ilya on Wed Nov 13, 2002 9:28 am

if it's a geforce 4 mx, get rid of it...

get yourself an ati radeon 9000 64 megs, like i did, for 100 bucks... good deal, and should last you a couple years
ilya
 
Posts: 100
Joined: Mon Nov 11, 2002 3:46 pm

Postby koolkatgold on Wed Nov 13, 2002 9:29 am

Kobe4mvp wrote:
By the way... Vince and T-mac are way better than Kobe. Just my opinion.


Vince is no match against Kobe, ok......... U can compare T-Mac wit Kobe but not Vince!!!! :)



hello, WHAT ABOUR PIERCE!!! vince isn't anything compared to he was, and besides he's injured... KOBE is being over played... TmAC has had some back problems... but u can compare kobe tmac and pierce together... Kobe has the skills, tmac has the athletic ability, but pierce has the desire... u tell me, what is most important... Pierce wants to win the most... you can just look at his face... kobe and tmac do too, especially mr. bryant... but pierce just has that aggravasion that makes him the best player
User avatar
koolkatgold
 
Posts: 77
Joined: Mon Nov 11, 2002 9:42 pm

Postby . on Thu Nov 14, 2002 6:46 am

This is a graphics card topic, not a whoz better!!!
.
 
Posts: 3706
Joined: Mon Nov 11, 2002 10:02 pm

Postby Nick on Thu Nov 14, 2002 6:55 am

LOL :lol:
User avatar
Nick
Barnsketball
Contributor
 
Posts: 6536
Joined: Sun Sep 15, 2002 9:01 pm
Location: Melbourne, Australia

Postby arie2315 on Thu Nov 14, 2002 8:14 am

hey, how well would this work - 1.7 ghz, 256 mb ram, 52x cdr, tnt2 ?
(speedwise, graphicswise...)
arie2315
 
Posts: 22
Joined: Thu Nov 14, 2002 8:02 am


Return to NBA Live 2003

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest