fvdmc wrote:Here is an additional back up that might shut your mouth, BISHI:
When computer games are made, they have to be made at a range where numerous people can purchase and play. If a game required a P4 and a Radeon 9800 Pro --HELL YEAH IT WOULD KICK ASS -- but think about how it would do out in the market? FREAKIN HORRIBLE. In other words, NO ONE WILL BE ABLE TO PLAY IT; THUS, NO ONE WILL PURCHASE IT. Do you think a software compant would be willing to throw tons of money down the drain for no reason? HELL NO. Therefore, before the game is released, it is tested and rounded up. Testers and the developers MAKE SURE that it fits a range so majority of computer game consumers can purcahse it and play. I hope I made myself clear! If this does not sound persuasive, I advise you to contact EA yourself and ask.
fvdmc wrote:You dumb ass PARIAH! Call up EA yourself and ask you dumb FUCK. You'll be DEAD WRONG.
bishibashiboy wrote:And you are abosolutely wrong about no one buying a game requiring a high end pc. At the time Unreal 1 was released the top of the line graphics card could only run it around 25fps. The game did awesome in sales still.
Quake3, the best graphics card at the time could barely break 30fps. It took the power of a Geforce2 to bring it to >60fps.
Games that push the envelope for technology will still do well. You missed the entire point that people can STILL PLAY THE GAME, ONLY NOT AT FULL DETAIL LEVELS WITH LOW END SYSTEMS.
fvdmc wrote:bishibashiboy wrote:And you are abosolutely wrong about no one buying a game requiring a high end pc. At the time Unreal 1 was released the top of the line graphics card could only run it around 25fps. The game did awesome in sales still.
Quake3, the best graphics card at the time could barely break 30fps. It took the power of a Geforce2 to bring it to >60fps.
Games that push the envelope for technology will still do well. You missed the entire point that people can STILL PLAY THE GAME, ONLY NOT AT FULL DETAIL LEVELS WITH LOW END SYSTEMS.
Hmm... that's called exaggeration. I'm curious, did you go to school?
fvdmc wrote:I have already CALLED EA... and they support my concept of console being better, graphic-wise. I have 100% True proof. And you, have an legitimate explanation, but it's not backed. SO NO.
bishibashiboy wrote:fvdmc wrote:bishibashiboy wrote:And you are abosolutely wrong about no one buying a game requiring a high end pc. At the time Unreal 1 was released the top of the line graphics card could only run it around 25fps. The game did awesome in sales still.
Quake3, the best graphics card at the time could barely break 30fps. It took the power of a Geforce2 to bring it to >60fps.
Games that push the envelope for technology will still do well. You missed the entire point that people can STILL PLAY THE GAME, ONLY NOT AT FULL DETAIL LEVELS WITH LOW END SYSTEMS.
Hmm... that's called exaggeration. I'm curious, did you go to school?
What in my post was an exaggeration?
All of this is the blatant truth. You need to keep up more with what's going on.
Go to ANY hardware site. Hardocp, Tomshardware, Anandtech, etc.
gut wrote:I think.... you could say (and what EA said) the XBOX give out the best graphics ~~ because it need not to concern about the performance range.
But you couldn't say that all PC will kicked by the XBOX~
I think with a powerful PC (with Top GPU, CPU, etc) should have better graphics than XBOX~
You claimed why PC version always came out last, "... because EA is cutting out things and rounding things up so it fits all computer PERFORMANCE RANGES", that is what I disagree.
I think what they did is try to implement more possible combination of different hardware/classes of hardware. So that everyone can choose from a range of performance options.
But not what you said to cutting out something ~
Did you ever play the "TOMB RAIDER: The Angel of Darkness"??
there are plenty of options for you to select. The quality can be totally different between the lowest & highest settings.
All in All, i agree that XBOX should "AVERAGING" the best graphics. However, you can still taste better if you have a top PC ~
fvdmc wrote:bishibashiboy wrote:fvdmc wrote:bishibashiboy wrote:And you are abosolutely wrong about no one buying a game requiring a high end pc. At the time Unreal 1 was released the top of the line graphics card could only run it around 25fps. The game did awesome in sales still.
Quake3, the best graphics card at the time could barely break 30fps. It took the power of a Geforce2 to bring it to >60fps.
Games that push the envelope for technology will still do well. You missed the entire point that people can STILL PLAY THE GAME, ONLY NOT AT FULL DETAIL LEVELS WITH LOW END SYSTEMS.
Hmm... that's called exaggeration. I'm curious, did you go to school?
What in my post was an exaggeration?
All of this is the blatant truth. You need to keep up more with what's going on.
Go to ANY hardware site. Hardocp, Tomshardware, Anandtech, etc.
HOLY COW!!! When I said NO BUYS THE GAME... that's when I meant exaggerated. For christ sake... take an online english COURSE OR SOMETHING AND THEN COME BACK. GEEEISH.
bishibashiboy wrote:fvdmc wrote:I have already CALLED EA... and they support my concept of console being better, graphic-wise. I have 100% True proof. And you, have an legitimate explanation, but it's not backed. SO NO.
What does calling eA have to do with anything? Are they god? Do you accpet everything they say with a blind eye? Does it MATTER what one of their unknowledgable sales ppl say? Learn to reason. They will spew out any garbage they want to make a sale.
fvdmc wrote:bishibashiboy wrote:fvdmc wrote:I have already CALLED EA... and they support my concept of console being better, graphic-wise. I have 100% True proof. And you, have an legitimate explanation, but it's not backed. SO NO.
What does calling eA have to do with anything? Are they god? Do you accpet everything they say with a blind eye? Does it MATTER what one of their unknowledgable sales ppl say? Learn to reason. They will spew out any garbage they want to make a sale.
Hmmm GOD??? AAAA they MADE THE GAME,a dn you think they're wrong.
fvdmc wrote:Okay, forget this nonsense. It seems like we're getting NOWHERE. You believe in what you believe, and I'll believe in what I and EA believe.
Let's ends this RIGHT HERE........Good.
It's settled.
bishibashiboy wrote:fvdmc wrote:Okay, forget this nonsense. It seems like we're getting NOWHERE. You believe in what you believe, and I'll believe in what I and EA believe.
Let's ends this RIGHT HERE........Good.
It's settled.
You really need to learn about what you're talking about before you type something. Nobody agrees with you here for good reason. Your points don't make sense.
fvdmc wrote:bishibashiboy wrote:fvdmc wrote:Okay, forget this nonsense. It seems like we're getting NOWHERE. You believe in what you believe, and I'll believe in what I and EA believe.
Let's ends this RIGHT HERE........Good.
It's settled.
You really need to learn about what you're talking about before you type something. Nobody agrees with you here for good reason. Your points don't make sense.
You really have to learn how to read. How come everyone here was able to interpret my "confusing" sentences, except you?
fvdmc wrote:OK OK OK...Whooooo I forgot context clue from here to there. But that's how sentences are structured. This way, the thoughts you try to convey isn't 243267 pages long.
This is where you have to be watchful and coloquial.
Bishi... I'm getting tried. Please, end this nonsense. I was up at 96 post at the beginning. Look at my posts tracking NOW! lol
gut wrote:one more thing,
would it be possible that the XBOX version is the most profitable version ??
maybe that's why the sales guy told you that the XBOX one is the best~
Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 2 guests