sticky-fingers wrote:I used the WARN function of the forum hours ago but it seems that the Admins dont care. If its a new tolerance in this community, ok lets go party.
Lets modify all the mods (rosters, courts, faces, portraits, scoreboards) and release it without any credit and permissions...
No, that isn't the case. However, it's only appropriate to let people sort things out without constant and immediate intervention on our part, so that people don't feel like they're walking on eggshells. I'd rather not treat people like children or come down like a tonne of bricks on people when it isn't necessary, such as when there's been a misunderstanding like this. People deserve a chance to be informed of the situation, and make it right by either seeking permission, or simply removing the work as you would prefer in this case. I would hope that once Stove logs in and is up to speed on the situation, it will be put right and that court removed ASAP. If not, that's when I'll intervene because your reasonable request won't have been respected and followed. It's only fair that Stove has a chance to fix the situation given the circumstances, just as it's only fair that you're asking him to remove your work.
Reporting a post lets us know that there's a situation to monitor and take action on as necessary. If it's sorted out without the need for us to intervene, then great; ideally, that's how it should be when there are disagreements and honest mistakes in modding, and people are willing to do the right thing after messing up. If a situation needs immediate intervention, or if a situation can't be resolved quickly, properly, and peacefully, that's when we'll step in. It's not about letting people get away with stuff, it's about giving them a chance to receive the complaint and make amends. If it was intentionally stolen work, it'd be different and I'd be issuing a warning much quicker. When there's a honest mistake as there obviously was here, I'll give someone an ample chance to do the right thing before I go off on them.
We do want to be fair and consistent with the rules, but that also means handling things on a case-by-case basis and considering the context of the situation. Using work that you've been sent by someone else with the understanding you've got full permission to use it, but haven't because there's been a mix-up, isn't the same as intentionally taking someone's work without asking and not giving credit. We're not going to be heavy-handed with the former, while the latter would demand more forceful intervention out of the gate. The same would go for refusing to comply with a request in the first case, but people need a chance to respond first.