benji wrote:Some of you guys are acting like the Nolan directed, Goyer written, Batman films aren't plotting messes with lousy characters, hamfisted dialogue and incoherent direction that go for style over substance.
Cranston has reportedly signed a deal that includes at least six appearances (and possibly more), meaning that his character will appear in a variety of films set within the inter-connected DC Comics universe.
"Cranston is truly a dream casting for Luthor," a source told Cosmic Book News.
This news follows last week's controversial announcement that Ben Affleck has signed on to play Batman in the same film. The actor reportedly inked a deal that includes 13 total appearances.
SoF'nAwesome wrote:What do you guys think the chances are of Affleck stepping back from the role? I mean, it would be very risky to make a movie with him when thousands are signing against it.
Keaton's casting caused a controversy among comic book fans,[10] with 50,000 protest letters sent to Warner Bros. offices.[8] Bob Kane, Sam Hamm and Michael Uslan also heavily questioned the casting.[6] Burton acknowledged, "Obviously there was a negative response from the comic book people. I think they thought we were going to make it like the 1960s TV series, and make it campy, because they thought of Michael Keaton from Mr. Mom and Night Shift and stuff like that."
...
Batman opened on June 23, 1989, grossing $43.6 million in 2,194 theaters during its opening weekend. This broke the opening weekend record, set by Ghostbusters II one week earlier, with $29.4 million.[50] Batman would eventually gross $251.2 million in North America and $160.15 million internationally, totaling $411.35 million.[51] Batman was the first film to earn $100 million in its first ten days of release,[3] and was the highest grossing film based on a DC comic book until 2008's The Dark Knight.[52] The film's gross is the 66th highest ever in North American ranks.[53] Although Indiana Jones and the Last Crusade made the most money worldwide in 1989,[54] Batman was able to beat The Last Crusade in North America,[55] and made a further $150 million in home video sales.[
Batman was criticized in some quarters for being "too dark".[3] Many observed that Burton was more interested in the Joker and the art and set production design than Batman or anything else in terms of characterization and screentime
...
Burton biographer Alison McMahan wrote, "fans of the Batman franchise complained when they heard of Michael Keaton's casting. However, no one complained when they saw his performance."
SoF'nAwesome wrote:Rises, Begins & Dark Knight were as perfect as cinema gets.
SoF'nAwesome wrote:You think Affleck is gonna pull it off?
el badman wrote:Me too, but then again pulling it off in a Zack Snyder movie isn't much of an achievement.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 4 guests