Science Spits on Albert Einstein's Long Dead Face

[volsey]

I think you watched Deja Vu with Denzel a few too many times. Stop pretending like anything you said has any factual basis for being even plausibly 'theoretical' at all.

One step closer to time travel, I'm sorry but were we ever pointed in the right direction of time travel? This by no means has any implication that time travel is more tangible, since everything even remotely related to the subject is hugely theoretical, and since this discovery disproves theories that for the past century have been used as the foundations of physics.

As for the energy as vibration... energy is just atomic movement, entropy, kinematic, heat w/e you want to call it, its the reaction between atoms... how is that a frequency?

Anyways, major theories have been disproved before, most of them are found to be accurate regarding a relative field, and therefore are still applicable today (Newton). I think this is just the way of the universe, I don't think there will ever be an absolute Law that applies to everything everywhere anytime. I'm not saying this isn't huge news, or that I saw this coming (get out of here, you don't know what you're talking about, neither do I), just saying he was an amazing man and I have no idea how he derived his conclusions given the time period he lived on this earth, if everything he theorized were found to be Laws, he would in fact be God.

[shadowgrin]

yes it's more likely to happen than time travel. I was comparing those two. Not sending messages through time in general.

Sending messagges to the past is obviously more likely and easy than time travel.

Sending something to the past is time travel.

I'm really not the one that makes you look like an idiot. You're doing it to yourself by backpedaling things that you say.

[Dc311]

I am actually from the year 2581.

[Mandich]

He is in fact my favorite actor How can I pretend it has basis when this is all pure guessing mate ? I am just saying my beliefs and opinions.

Newton was a great man for his time, agreed.

P.S. is your avatar that guy that set his firm on fire in that movie with J. Aniston ?

[Mandich]

No shit Shadow, I was reffering to human time travel.

[shadowgrin]

No shite mandich, my previous reply applies to both human time travel or message time travel...

Sending messagges to the past is obviously more likely and easy.

Causality violation/paradox. Yeah, real easy. Might as well divide by zero while we're at it.

[Mandich]

K, you win.end of discussion.

[shadowgrin]

If you want to, go ahead.

I'm still going to post these images that I made while posting in this thread. I wasted my time with it sure as hell I will post it!


* time travel to the past

[volsey]

Looks like an angry birds spin off.

[Andrew]

I'm by no means an expert on these things but I'm inclined to believe that if time travel is ever achieved, it'll be forwards and not backwards (and not really time travel as portrayed in science fiction and fantasy). The ability to travel back in time suggests that somehow, everything in history is being replayed over and over on interconnected planes of existence that could conceivably be traveled to and from, and sculpted via the butterfly effect. I suppose I can't disprove it, but I'm inclined to doubt it.

[Patr1ck]

I think if anything, we can only see into the past. Every star we see at night is the light that had eventually reached us. That means we might not actually be looking at a star, but where it was relative to the time it took the light to get to earth. I think it would eventually be possible to come up with some technology that would allow us to capture light in a precise way to see things in more detail from the past, but that is it.

On the other hand, from my personal experience, I have dreamed of small scenes in my life that ended up happening in the future.

[Dc311]

Looks like an angry birds spin off.

HaHa!!

I think if anything, we can only see into the past. Every star we see at night is the light that had eventually reached us. That means we might not actually be looking at a star, but where it was relative to the time it took the light to get to earth.

Honestly,this is a very good way to get a female interested in you.If you are outside,and you see the female,walk up next to her and explain this to her.The chances of her knowing about this is low,so it would be more points for you.Then introduce yourself.It works for me about 60% of the time.

[koberulz]

The chances of her knowing about this is low,so it would be more points for you.Then introduce yourself.It works for me about 60% of the time.

Are most women stupid where you come from?

[benji]

I'm by no means an expert on these things but I'm inclined to believe that if time travel is ever achieved, it'll be forwards and not backwards (and not really time travel as portrayed in science fiction and fantasy). The ability to travel back in time suggests that somehow, everything in history is being replayed over and over on interconnected planes of existence that could conceivably be traveled to and from, and sculpted via the butterfly effect. I suppose I can't disprove it, but I'm inclined to doubt it.

Or it suggests that the only way history can exist the way it is, is due to people traveling back and doing what they have to do (kill Lincoln, get peanut butter in chocolate, kill Edith Keeler, start the Big Bang, etc.) either intentionally, by accident or by fate and so if backwards time travel is impossible our existence cannot ever exist.

[Dc311]

The chances of her knowing about this is low,so it would be more points for you.Then introduce yourself.It works for me about 60% of the time.

Are most women stupid where you come from?

I don't know.Let me go ask.



They said no.

[shadowgrin]

Looks like an angry birds spin off.

I Didn't notice that.
Any of the Angry Birds faster than light? I don't think so.

[Andrew]

Or it suggests that the only way history can exist the way it is, is due to people traveling back and doing what they have to do (kill Lincoln, get peanut butter in chocolate, kill Edith Keeler, start the Big Bang, etc.) either intentionally, by accident or by fate and so if backwards time travel is impossible our existence cannot ever exist.

Then the technology/mystical forces must already exist and are just being covered up.

Somebody call Jesse Ventura!

[benji]

Or we can't detect them!

Also, Area 51. Freemasons, Illuminati, Bilderberg Group, The Fellowship and Trilateral Commission.

And how convenient that Google Chrome doesn't spell check BILDERBERG.

[Andrew]

We're on to them now. We best watch our backs.

[volsey]

K well back on subject there was recently a Family Guy episode that could teach us all a thing or two about time travel...

[Andrew]

...that time travel results in lengthy, hit and miss cutaway gags?

[shadowgrin]

[shadowgrin]

http://news.sciencemag.org/scienceinsid ... aster.html

It appears that the faster-than-light neutrino results, announced last September by the OPERA collaboration in Italy, was due to a mistake after all. A bad connection between a GPS unit and a computer may be to blame.

According to sources familiar with the experiment, the 60 nanoseconds discrepancy appears to come from a bad connection between a fiber optic cable that connects to the GPS receiver used to correct the timing of the neutrinos' flight and an electronic card in a computer.
New data, however, will be needed to confirm this hypothesis.

[benji]

They should have just used thought instead of a FiOps cable and its limited vibrations.

[Patr1ck]

Nope. They are just covering it up because they found something that they can use it for that they don't want anyone else to have. Original founding speed is still accurate. Either that or corruption to increase funding for new project.