Sun Jun 19, 2005 5:32 pm
Money shouldn't be the reason for putting out music in my book. And that's all there is to it.
Sun Jun 19, 2005 7:08 pm
Jae wrote:The money bands make is mostly from tours. They get a shit load of money from touring, hence people like The Rolling Stones. I mean if you think about it, some bullshit little band can get $50 for playing in front of 12 people at a pub who didn't even pay to go there... how much do you think someone like Metallica is going to make when they play say 50 shows around the World, with 20 odd thousand people at each paying over $100 a ticket.Money shouldn't be the reason for putting out music in my book. And that's all there is to it.
I disagree... music for money is good by me, as long as the music is good. If you like it, who cares what their motives are behind it.
Sun Jun 19, 2005 8:51 pm
Sun Jun 19, 2005 9:46 pm
Sun Jun 19, 2005 10:10 pm
Sun Jun 19, 2005 10:49 pm
Simple Plan are making good on the promise they made to thousands of screaming fans in March and returning to Australia and New Zealand for their first headline tour.
Touring Auckland, Christchurch, Sydney, Melbourne, Brisbane, Adelaide, and Perth, Simple Plan will hit major venues in September and October.
Jae wrote:Simple Plan need to be removed from music permanately.
Sun Jun 19, 2005 11:05 pm
Simple Plan are making good on the promise they made to thousands of screaming fans
Mon Jun 20, 2005 1:33 am
Mon Jun 20, 2005 3:33 am
Habbakuk wrote:Jowe wrote:Habbakuk wrote:So very mainstream-ish.
Don't think I'm really sold on any really big band, mostly because they don't play the music I like, and I'm just against music created for profit (post Metallica (black album) and everything after Use Your Illusion II).
Are smoking crack? everything after use your illusion II?
What album would that be? Chinese democracy that has been delayed for 11 years now?..![]()
People making music to earn some money, oh shame on them.
Rather the bazillion of greatest hits (here in Sweden I've seen 3, dunno if there are more). And yeah, music made for profit is fucking bullshit. Sure you should make money, but it shouldn't be the driving force behind the creation. Then the reason behind arts is lost and instantly goes on my shitlist, no matter the artist.
Jona - Not Rush. Never Rush. 2112 is one of the top-50 albums of all times.
Mon Jun 20, 2005 5:26 am
Jowe wrote:Habbakuk wrote:Jowe wrote:Habbakuk wrote:Jowe wrote:Habbakuk wrote:So very mainstream-ish.
Don't think I'm really sold on any really big band, mostly because they don't play the music I like, and I'm just against music created for profit (post Metallica (black album) and everything after Use Your Illusion II).
Are smoking crack? everything after use your illusion II?
What album would that be? Chinese democracy that has been delayed for 11 years now?..![]()
People making music to earn some money, oh shame on them.
Rather the bazillion of greatest hits (here in Sweden I've seen 3, dunno if there are more). And yeah, music made for profit is fucking bullshit. Sure you should make money, but it shouldn't be the driving force behind the creation. Then the reason behind arts is lost and instantly goes on my shitlist, no matter the artist.
Jona - Not Rush. Never Rush. 2112 is one of the top-50 albums of all times.
Guns n roses have only released one greatest hits album, and the band & axl themselves tried to stop it being released. The record company are the ones that released it....
You've seen three? ...Did you see the loch ness monster too. They were bootlegs. Most of the time the artist hardly see any money from record sales, the only time they get a fat paycheck is when they tour.
Yeah, my former roommate had three, but since i loathe GNR I didn't look too closly. But they didn't look like bootlegs to me.
And your claim that artists seldom see money from recordsales are more relevant today, but before the p2p-boom (when this is relevant) it's not.
No matter if they make money through the records, that's not the basis of what I'm saying.
When music is created in the purpose of making money, I find it to be crap and the artist directly slots themselves into "we're whores" category that I have in my head somewhere.
Money shouldn't be the reason for putting out music in my book. And that's all there is to it.
No... I'm talking about if you buy an album.. now or ten years ago. More then likely less then 10% of it goes to the artist. All the money goes to the record company.
The artists make their money from the contract they sign with the record company. Thats when you hear people calling bands / artists sellouts, is when they sign to big record companys for a load of money.
Selling alot of albums, doesn't make an artist a music sell out whore.
If thats the case are you calling Led Zeppelin, Queen, Black Sabbath sellout whores?
Mon Jun 20, 2005 3:35 pm
Mon Jun 20, 2005 3:50 pm
Mon Jun 20, 2005 4:06 pm
Mon Jun 20, 2005 7:33 pm
Mon Jun 20, 2005 7:43 pm
skins wrote:Is anyone on here into the Indie Rock scene?
I'm talking about people like Ted Leo & The Pharmacists, The Decemberists, The Mars Volta, Iron and Wine, Death Cab for Cutie, etc...
Wed Jun 22, 2005 6:27 am
Thu Jun 23, 2005 12:04 am
Jae wrote:Big alexisonfire fan
Thu Jun 23, 2005 2:46 am
Sun Jun 26, 2005 5:52 pm
Sun Jun 26, 2005 8:13 pm
Sun Jun 26, 2005 8:35 pm
Jaesus wrote:Alexisonfire is playing in Adelaide on the 8th of August! Tickets are only $35 so I'm definitely going. Might also be going to Alice Cooper and Billy Thorpe.
Sun Jun 26, 2005 8:41 pm
Jowe wrote:Jaesus wrote:Alexisonfire is playing in Adelaide on the 8th of August! Tickets are only $35 so I'm definitely going. Might also be going to Alice Cooper and Billy Thorpe.
lol where are you gonna get the money for alice cooper man? the tix are 160bucks a pop.
Mon Jun 27, 2005 12:51 am
Jowe wrote:Jaesus wrote:Alexisonfire is playing in Adelaide on the 8th of August! Tickets are only $35 so I'm definitely going. Might also be going to Alice Cooper and Billy Thorpe.
lol where are you gonna get the money for alice cooper man? the tix are 160bucks a pop.
Mon Jun 27, 2005 2:30 am
Mon Jun 27, 2005 2:32 am
cyanide wrote:Is he still a republican when Bush took over?