rise wrote:It's sad when your vote is a "not-Mitt Romney" vote rather than a "for Barack Obama" vote, but that's what I did.
The good thing is you can make a not-Romney and not-Obama vote like this hero:
Dc311 wrote:I am going to go vote when everything opens in a few hours.I am voting for Gary Johnson.I know he is not going to win but I would rather contribute to trying to get him 5% of the vote in order to have three parties in the 2016 election.
When you're offered a false choice, the best method is to reject both.
rise wrote:Neither candidate really makes me thrilled, but a Mitt Romney presidency will essentially be Bush 2.0
No, Romney will be Bush 3.0. Obama has been Bush 2.0. He's continued or made worse every single Bush Administration policy. He even tried to get out of the agreement Bush made to leave Iraq. He's raided exponentially more marijuana dispensers than the Bush Admin ever did. Fast and Furious was a more fucked up gunwalking program. The GM theft Obama committed was worse than the Bush bailouts. His stimulus was more of a give away to cronies. NDAA goes farther than the Patriot Act. Bush at least got some form of Congressional approval for Iraq and Afghanistan, what did Obama get for Libya? Yemen? Pakistan? He's Bush 2.0.
At least we can have on record the people who support
murdering Americans without due process and
all the other absolutely horrible shit Obama has done because well, Romney must be worse than the worst President of the century even though they agree on nearly everything! Pay no attention to all the "
loaded weapons" he's leaving around for Romney or Santorum or Palin to use!
At some point you can't support a murderous thug just because the other guy (and next potential murderous thug) wants to cut taxes instead of raising them.
Reject the false choice.