Laxation wrote:Matthew your dick
lol what the fuck.
As for your the rest of your post, of course I didn't read it, I don't read garbage articles. I never said I agree with either side. But seeing as you feel so strongly about the subject...
There are two lines of thinking as to why someone would want williams. Team success is what GM's want to build their team around, it isnt NBA Live. Whilst there is no comparison skill wise between Ray Allen and Williams, Ray Allen is on max money and Williams is still on a rookie contract.
Lets look at the impact of shaq. Once again, to avoid confusion (which happens regularly with you), I'm not comparing Shaq to Williams. But gm's look for team success before anything else these days. Thats why Steve Nash was wanted in Pheonix, and not Marbury. If Orlando can trade Tmac for essentially Darko and improve, it's not too far fetched to think that if likewise happened to Ray Allen the Sonics could actually be a better ballclub.
You may say that "Well i dont own the sonics, its my own team", and thats all well and good. In that scenario, a Ray Allen will only be more benficial if you have talent around him. Allen (or even any legends bar the very top echelon) wont make a difference, they'll still be losing.
Now if you say that you're adding Ray Allen to the Pistons or San Antonio, then its not really building it around Ray Allen is it?