Andrew wrote:The downside of calling a lot of travels by the book is that it will slow the game down and cause officials to wave off a few baskets. No one wants to see a spectacular dunk negated by a ticky-tack call. But there's plenty of shuffling and so forth that really should be called.
Andrew wrote:The downside of calling a lot of travels by the book is that it will slow the game down and cause officials to wave off a few baskets. No one wants to see a spectacular dunk negated by a ticky-tack call. But there's plenty of shuffling and so forth that really should be called.
Andre wrote:Andrew wrote:The downside of calling a lot of travels by the book is that it will slow the game down and cause officials to wave off a few baskets. No one wants to see a spectacular dunk negated by a ticky-tack call. But there's plenty of shuffling and so forth that really should be called.
Agreed. But you seem to start from the assumption that NBA players must travel sometimes, when is pretty easy to pay more attention and not travel anymore. I mean, the NBA is a circus with regards to travelling. SOmeone must teach this kids some fundamentals, but untill th referees don't call the infraction, there is no reason for players to start paying attention
Camazing wrote:[color=orange]It has become that the NBA is a laughinstock to people in terms of travelling.
James collected 23 points, nine rebounds and nine assists but was called for traveling twice down the stretch. He complained to referee Mike Davis and was whistled for a technical foul with 1:20 left.
"I've been doing those moves since I started playing basketball and they've never been a travel," James said. "I've been doing it all year and they call traveling now? I thought they gave an extra step in the NBA."
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests