crawford2NYK4real wrote:tom tolbert sure doesn't like crawford...
it's debateable whether marbury should have had the last shot. but i disagree with you (andrew) and the espn commentators.
Just wanted to point out that I didn't agree with them simply to look knowledgable or anything like that. Although I have the honour of sharing my birthday with Tom Tolbert, I generally don't care for his commentary. But even if they hadn't made the comment about Marbury, I would have felt that allowing Crawford to use that possession and take that shot was a bad move.
crawford2NYK4real wrote:there have been more then several occasions where crawford has been the one taking the last shot (and hitting them) even if he's shooting 20% for that given game. the only thing i question was the type of shot crawford took at the end. but hey, that's crawford's game, you kind of have to live and die with that.
Indeed, he can be trusted to take game winning shots. But he had cooled off a bit while Marbury was shooting well and was also having a good night playing off his teammates and also finding them for easy points. I can't sit here and say for sure that Marbury would have hit a shot or made a pass for a made basket on that play, but I would have rather had Marbury creating something than Crawford bringing it up, wasting the clock then taking that heavily contest jumpshot.
crawford2NYK4real wrote:and that's the only disappointing thing to see from him- he has a coach that believes in him and his teammates are more talented then in chicago but he still has those lapses where he's taking some crazy shots
I agree. Again, he's perfectly capable of hitting big shots and putting points up on the board, but if the plan was to let him do what he did in the final minute (he also put a pretty ill-advised shot a couple of plays before that) then the Knicks would have been playing much smarter basketball if Marbury had been given the opportunity to do what he had been doing on the last few possessions.