Jason Kidd sidelined

by **thaKEAF** on Thu Sep 02, 2004 8:59 am

According to ESPN Bottomline, Jason Kidd will not play till December because of knee surgery.

Goodbye Nets.

by **Matthew** on Thu Sep 02, 2004 9:17 am

The Nets chances were gone when Kmart went to denver. Their only chance is if alonzo comes back to pre kidney disease form... which is the same chance as grant hill returning to pre orlando form.

by **Alcoholic** on Thu Sep 02, 2004 10:49 am

Hey!, there's still a chance! :cry:

by **_ØSkIpToMyLoUØ_** on Thu Sep 02, 2004 11:04 am

Great news for the raptors. Now that New Jersey is done Raptors can win the division. I think we can beat the Knicks even if they have crawford. We got vince, bosh , rose, alston, marshall, mopete(who will be better with sam mitchell as coach), and young players who could develop in to good bench player or even starters( moiso,woods,mason jr, araujo)

by **Fresh8** on Thu Sep 02, 2004 5:22 pm

who have the Nets lost?

Kenyon, Kittles and now Kidd. They are definately a loterry team. Damn- what a waste of a potentially consistent team

by **Riot** on Thu Sep 02, 2004 5:29 pm

all they need now is RJ to go down and they are really screwed :lol:

Plannic-Mercer-Williams-Williams-Collins

That is...really bad.

by **Fresh8** on Thu Sep 02, 2004 5:46 pm

lol

Mercer might actually shine this season! kool

but not cool...and RJ will be an all-star!

by **Riot** on Thu Sep 02, 2004 5:48 pm

will he be able to create his own shot with the defense's focusing solely on him?

by **j.23** on Thu Sep 02, 2004 5:49 pm

if they're lucky they might turn out like utah last year.. but i don't know.. whats the line up anyways?

Collins/Zo
Rogers
Jefferson
Harris
Zoran Planinsakfhkldsjdgl

yea seems like jefferson's the only threat but it shouldn't be hard to stop him if you throw two people at him. man that's a huge blow to the nets thats for sure

by **Macca** on Thu Sep 02, 2004 5:57 pm

Huge blow for the Nets... but at least we won't see another Spurs-Nets finals series.

With Kidd gone, it definatly looks like they'll be a lottery team, with Zo contemplating a return (we'll see) and RJ looking to be an All Star(damn!!

) it still won't be enough. Returing in December is a bit late for the Nets if they've already lost like 15-20 games over 2 months.

The Nets might be looking to start rebuilding with the "Brooklyn Nets" whole thing getting underway. Wonder where JKidd will go next; maybe finish his career in Dallas? :wink:

Macca

by **NNpF** on Sun Sep 05, 2004 6:44 pm

Rogers is gone too...

I think they should trade Kidd while they still can, but not for fucking draft picks. Get some help for Jefferson so you could have a little more then Jefferson to build around.

But...

The Nets will live on!

by **Macca** on Sun Sep 05, 2004 7:25 pm

tombz [j.23] wrote:Collins/Zo
Rogers
Jefferson
Harris
Zoran Planinsakfhkldsjdgl

You can throw that idea out the window; and so can the NETS staff.
Basically my friends, the New Jersey Nets are f!cked and I can defiantly see some big trades going down pretty soon. :shock:

There are gonna be some new faces in Jersey, a PF, a PG and a new C. :wink:

I bet anyone here...

Macca

by **Incubus** on Sun Sep 05, 2004 7:34 pm

tombz [j.23] wrote:Zoran Planinsakfhkldsjdgl

It`s Zo-ran Pla-ni-nic

by **Dogg** on Sun Sep 05, 2004 7:37 pm

MiniPETER wrote:
tombz [j.23] wrote:Zoran Planinsakfhkldsjdgl

It`s Zo-ran Pla-ni-nic

That first name was much cooler :lol:

by . on Sun Sep 05, 2004 8:02 pm

Jackal...you sstill want Kidd to LA?

Website · by **Carlos Boozer** on Mon Sep 06, 2004 3:49 am

Jefferson: 35 ppg :applaud:

by . on Mon Sep 06, 2004 3:52 am

Jefferson - Kidd = Bum

Website · by **Carlos Boozer** on Mon Sep 06, 2004 4:18 am

Mr T wrote:Jefferson - Kidd = Bum

No.He averaged 26.0 ppg without Kidd.

by **[Pistol]** on Mon Sep 06, 2004 4:33 am

Frank Castle wrote:No.He averaged 26.0 ppg without Kidd.

That's what we are all afraid of :lol:

. You haven't seen Orlando winning much, despite McGrady having an 30+ average, have you :lol:

?

by **TRIO DOROBO** on Mon Sep 06, 2004 4:37 am

Frank Castle wrote:
Mr T wrote:Jefferson - Kidd = Bum
No.He averaged 26.0 ppg without Kidd.

without martin??? without kittles???

by **J@3** on Mon Sep 06, 2004 4:41 am

maliit ang titi mo

Website · by **Carlos Boozer** on Mon Sep 06, 2004 5:29 am

That's what we are all afraid of . You haven't seen Orlando winning much, despite McGrady having an 30+ average, have you ?

Fuck you.

without martin??? without kittles???

Fuck you too.

I mean he can play without Kidd,Kittles,Martin.I haven't said he will bring wins.
And 26 + is very possible.

by **Fresh8** on Mon Sep 06, 2004 6:19 pm

hmmm... Kidd should leave to the Bobcats.... for a second round pick!

Bluesky · by **Andrew** on Mon Sep 06, 2004 7:29 pm

Frank Castle wrote:
That's what we are all afraid of . You haven't seen Orlando winning much, despite McGrady having an 30+ average, have you ?

Fuck you.
without martin??? without kittles???

Fuck you too.

Completely unnecessary. It's easy enough to argue points and disagree without that kind of response. Please don't post that way.

by **TRIO DOROBO** on Wed Sep 08, 2004 4:10 am

Frank Castle wrote:
That's what we are all afraid of . You haven't seen Orlando winning much, despite McGrady having an 30+ average, have you ?

Fuck you.
without martin??? without kittles???

Fuck you too.

I mean he can play without Kidd,Kittles,Martin.I haven't said he will bring wins.
And 26 + is very possible.

hey dont say foul word, what im trying to say was cna he average that much without kidd, martin and kittles. he score coz opposing defense will be divided among the players. without those 3, all eyes will be on jefferson making it hard for him to score. so next time dont just said word like that. peace men!!!

Jason Kidd sidelined

Jason Kidd sidelined

Who is online