release vs. buyout
4 posts
• Page 1 of 1
release vs. buyout
by Amphatoast on Sun Dec 28, 2003 7:40 pm
can someone explain the difference between a player being released and a player being buyout?
- Amphatoast
- Posts: 3004
- Joined: Wed Jul 02, 2003 5:45 am
- Location: new york
by Wall St. Peon on Sun Dec 28, 2003 8:19 pm
I may be wrong, but I think I'm right...
When a player's released, the team has to pay the remainder of their contract. When their contract is bought out, an agreement is reached and a lump sum is given or the remainder of the contract is paid to the player.
When a player's released, the team has to pay the remainder of their contract. When their contract is bought out, an agreement is reached and a lump sum is given or the remainder of the contract is paid to the player.
Shane
- Wall St. Peon
- Posts: 898
- Joined: Sun Oct 06, 2002 11:57 am
- Location: Des Moines, IA
by Ruff Ryder on Mon Dec 29, 2003 12:49 am
Mr. Shane wrote:I may be wrong, but I think I'm right...
When a player's released, the team has to pay the remainder of their contract. When their contract is bought out, an agreement is reached and a lump sum is given or the remainder of the contract is paid to the player.
I'm pretty sure thats right.
'Retired'
"You can’t drive a knife into a man’s back nine inches, pull it out six inches, and call it progress."-Malcolm X
-
Ruff Ryder - Posts: 5996
- Joined: Wed Jun 25, 2003 7:17 am
- Location: VA RLY
by bballer22 on Mon Dec 29, 2003 9:32 am
The only big diff is that teams usualy waive or relase players the are on minimus coz they cant buy it out any cheaper, but with a buy out u can get a lot of cap room coz its like the contract never existed.
- bballer22
- Posts: 522
- Joined: Sun Jan 05, 2003 1:39 pm
4 posts
• Page 1 of 1
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests