The "who's better?" thread

Like real basketball, as well as basketball video games? Talk about the NBA, NCAA, and other professional and amateur basketball leagues here.

Re: The "who's better?" thread

Postby _Steve_ on Sun Aug 07, 2011 12:52 am

NovU wrote:How could anyone count out the Mavs? They're the defending chumps with cores intact maybe even better with Butler back healthy. Even thought they're to be one year older, they still should be on the top of most peoples' power ranks untill they're dethroned. Seems to me Dirk and cos aren't still getting enough respect around. :cry:

I did not count them out. I just said, if the momentum shifts it would be much harder for the Mavs to defend the title...
But Mavs - because of their age - could really suffer if the lockout consumes a big part of next season.
“Get your facts first, then you can distort them as you please.” - Mark Twain
User avatar
_Steve_
 
Posts: 1652
Joined: Fri Jan 08, 2010 9:09 pm
Location: Hannover, Germany

Re: The "who's better?" thread

Postby kibaxx7 on Sun Aug 07, 2011 9:37 am

SteveHTOWN wrote:Mavs - because of their age - could really suffer if the lockout consumes a big part of next season.


That's what I was gonna say. I think the Celtics can make a push for the ring if that happens.
× Club Atlético Independiente. ×
× Watched:
The Brood (1979), Death of a Unicorn (2025), The Fourth Man (1983) ×
User avatar
kibaxx7
キバレンジャー
 
Posts: 12673
Joined: Fri Oct 08, 2004 11:34 am
Location: Buenos Aires, Argentina

Re: The "who's better?" thread

Postby Andrew on Sun Aug 07, 2011 11:17 am

SteveHTOWN wrote:I did not count them out. I just said, if the momentum shifts it would be much harder for the Mavs to defend the title...
But Mavs - because of their age - could really suffer if the lockout consumes a big part of next season.


The average age of the Lakers' roster is practically the same as the Mavs', so they'd be in the same boat if we're going by that assumption.
User avatar
Andrew
Retro Basketball Gamer
Administrator
 
Posts: 115168
Joined: Thu Aug 22, 2002 8:51 pm
Location: Australia

Re: The "who's better?" thread

Postby koberulz on Sun Aug 07, 2011 12:53 pm

Thierry • wrote:
SteveHTOWN wrote:Mavs - because of their age - could really suffer if the lockout consumes a big part of next season.


That's what I was gonna say. I think the Celtics can make a push for the ring if that happens.

...the Mavs are too old, so the Celtics have a shot? What?
User avatar
koberulz
Everything I say is false.
 
Posts: 4636
Joined: Sat Jun 04, 2005 11:46 pm
Location: Perth, Australia

Re: The "who's better?" thread

Postby Dan's Brain on Sun Aug 07, 2011 1:10 pm

NovU wrote:They're the defending chumps ..... Seems to me Dirk and cos aren't still getting enough respect around.


Hmmm.
User avatar
Dan's Brain
My Manwich!
 
Posts: 2150
Joined: Wed Nov 13, 2002 9:08 am
Location: Melbourne, Australia.

Re: The "who's better?" thread

Postby _Steve_ on Sun Aug 07, 2011 6:27 pm

Andrew wrote:
SteveHTOWN wrote:I did not count them out. I just said, if the momentum shifts it would be much harder for the Mavs to defend the title...
But Mavs - because of their age - could really suffer if the lockout consumes a big part of next season.


The average age of the Lakers' roster is practically the same as the Mavs', so they'd be in the same boat if we're going by that assumption.


You're right. So it would be on the Heat or maybe even Thunder, Grizzlies or Bulls.
“Get your facts first, then you can distort them as you please.” - Mark Twain
User avatar
_Steve_
 
Posts: 1652
Joined: Fri Jan 08, 2010 9:09 pm
Location: Hannover, Germany

Re: The "who's better?" thread

Postby shadowgrin on Sun Aug 07, 2011 9:28 pm

SteveHTOWN wrote:But Mavs - because of their age - could really suffer if the lockout consumes a big part of next season.

What caused you to come to that conclusion? If there's anything that helps old people, it's a lot of rest. Just ask the Celtics.
HE'S USING HYPNOSIS!
JaoSming2KTV wrote:its fun on a bun
shadowgrin
Doesn't negotiate with terrorists. NLSC's Jefferson Davis. The Questioneer
 
Posts: 23229
Joined: Thu Dec 12, 2002 6:21 am
Location: In your mind

Re: The "who's better?" thread

Postby deihatein on Sun Aug 07, 2011 10:49 pm

Guess the Mavs will stay the underdogs until we win like 5 championships.
shadowgrin wrote:Quick question: who is better in basketball, a black dude or a pinoy dude. If you thought or considered for a moment that it's the black dude then you're also a little bit racist.

End of any racist discussion.


Pinoy > Dallas Mavericks
User avatar
deihatein
Like he never left!
 
Posts: 3879
Joined: Fri Jan 26, 2007 9:13 pm
Location: Pilipphines

Re: The "who's better?" thread

Postby Cruzerr on Sun Aug 07, 2011 10:57 pm

shadowgrin wrote:
SteveHTOWN wrote:But Mavs - because of their age - could really suffer if the lockout consumes a big part of next season.

What caused you to come to that conclusion? If there's anything that helps old people, it's a lot of rest. Just ask the Celtics.


Just wanted to post that.
"Say whatever you want, m*therf*cker. Just say my name"
User avatar
Cruzerr
 
Posts: 1412
Joined: Fri Apr 15, 2011 12:36 am
Location: Estonia

Re: The "who's better?" thread

Postby Andrew on Mon Aug 08, 2011 10:40 am

Teams considerably older than the Mavs and Lakers have still won championships. I guess we can't rule out age catching up to them and being their downfall but consider also that a lockout abbreviated season would leave an older team with fresher legs come the Playoffs.
User avatar
Andrew
Retro Basketball Gamer
Administrator
 
Posts: 115168
Joined: Thu Aug 22, 2002 8:51 pm
Location: Australia

Re: The "who's better?" thread

Postby Dan's Brain on Mon Aug 08, 2011 10:46 am

However, if you look at the last lockout, teams played their 50 games in the space of 12 weeks. Which averages out to more than 4 games a week (Yay Maths!) and some weeks they played 5 times. That's a pretty brutal schedule, even with the reduced amount of travel. By the time that May rolls around, teams are probably still going to be every bit as banged up as they would normally.
User avatar
Dan's Brain
My Manwich!
 
Posts: 2150
Joined: Wed Nov 13, 2002 9:08 am
Location: Melbourne, Australia.

Re: The "who's better?" thread

Postby Andrew on Mon Aug 08, 2011 10:48 am

Perhaps but even then the Spurs won the title that year as the third oldest team in the league with the average age of the roster being 30.444, a little behind Houston (30.516) and Miami (30.58).
User avatar
Andrew
Retro Basketball Gamer
Administrator
 
Posts: 115168
Joined: Thu Aug 22, 2002 8:51 pm
Location: Australia

Re: The "who's better?" thread

Postby _Steve_ on Mon Aug 08, 2011 4:38 pm

shadowgrin wrote:
SteveHTOWN wrote:But Mavs - because of their age - could really suffer if the lockout consumes a big part of next season.

What caused you to come to that conclusion? If there's anything that helps old people, it's a lot of rest. Just ask the Celtics.


It is not about the age of a team in general. But how age and - the lockout caused - lack of routine stick togehter. "Old" people depend much on routine. If you don't play, you may lose some of it. I was also just refering to a quote from Dirk Nowitzki who said, the older you get, the harder it is to get back to rythm.
I surely agree that older players benefit from some extended holidays but not at cost of pre season preparation.
Want an other example, so think about MJ coming back from his first retirement. You couldn't say he was pysically not in shape, but he clearly lacked some NBA routine his comeback season...
“Get your facts first, then you can distort them as you please.” - Mark Twain
User avatar
_Steve_
 
Posts: 1652
Joined: Fri Jan 08, 2010 9:09 pm
Location: Hannover, Germany

Re: The "who's better?" thread

Postby shadowgrin on Mon Aug 08, 2011 5:06 pm

Michael Jordan scored 55 pts. in his 5th game from his first comback. 32 pts. the game before that. What's your point again?
HE'S USING HYPNOSIS!
JaoSming2KTV wrote:its fun on a bun
shadowgrin
Doesn't negotiate with terrorists. NLSC's Jefferson Davis. The Questioneer
 
Posts: 23229
Joined: Thu Dec 12, 2002 6:21 am
Location: In your mind

Re: The "who's better?" thread

Postby _Steve_ on Mon Aug 08, 2011 5:49 pm

shadowgrin wrote:Michael Jordan scored 55 pts. in his 5th game from his first comback. 32 pts. the game before that. What's your point again?


Cherrypicking. Things like that http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OFs16GWXT_w happened plus he got much better the following season.
“Get your facts first, then you can distort them as you please.” - Mark Twain
User avatar
_Steve_
 
Posts: 1652
Joined: Fri Jan 08, 2010 9:09 pm
Location: Hannover, Germany

Re: The "who's better?" thread

Postby benji on Mon Aug 08, 2011 6:04 pm

Kobe scored 81. Case closed.
User avatar
benji
 
Posts: 14545
Joined: Sat Nov 16, 2002 9:09 am

Re: The "who's better?" thread

Postby koberulz on Mon Aug 08, 2011 8:59 pm

SteveHTOWN wrote:
shadowgrin wrote:Michael Jordan scored 55 pts. in his 5th game from his first comback. 32 pts. the game before that. What's your point again?


Cherrypicking. Things like that http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OFs16GWXT_w happened plus he got much better the following season.

"You're cherrypicking! Look at this one play I found instead!"

What?
User avatar
koberulz
Everything I say is false.
 
Posts: 4636
Joined: Sat Jun 04, 2005 11:46 pm
Location: Perth, Australia

Re: The "who's better?" thread

Postby _Steve_ on Mon Aug 08, 2011 9:11 pm

koberulz wrote:
SteveHTOWN wrote:
shadowgrin wrote:Michael Jordan scored 55 pts. in his 5th game from his first comback. 32 pts. the game before that. What's your point again?


Cherrypicking. Things like that http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OFs16GWXT_w happened plus he got much better the following season.

"You're cherrypicking! Look at this one play I found instead!"

What?


It wasn't only one play. He seemed a little bit fresher, slightly quicker and he shot a lot better the next season.

1994-95 26.9 PPG; .411 FG% .801 FT%
vs.
1995-96 30.4 PPG; .495 FG% .834 FT%

Forget about FT but 3,5 ppg more and nearly 50 % from the field compared to just about 40 % aren't nothing. So it wasn't just one play.
“Get your facts first, then you can distort them as you please.” - Mark Twain
User avatar
_Steve_
 
Posts: 1652
Joined: Fri Jan 08, 2010 9:09 pm
Location: Hannover, Germany

Re: The "who's better?" thread

Postby Andrew on Mon Aug 08, 2011 10:38 pm

SteveHTOWN wrote:
shadowgrin wrote:
SteveHTOWN wrote:But Mavs - because of their age - could really suffer if the lockout consumes a big part of next season.

What caused you to come to that conclusion? If there's anything that helps old people, it's a lot of rest. Just ask the Celtics.


It is not about the age of a team in general. But how age and - the lockout caused - lack of routine stick togehter. "Old" people depend much on routine. If you don't play, you may lose some of it. I was also just refering to a quote from Dirk Nowitzki who said, the older you get, the harder it is to get back to rythm.
I surely agree that older players benefit from some extended holidays but not at cost of pre season preparation.
Want an other example, so think about MJ coming back from his first retirement. You couldn't say he was pysically not in shape, but he clearly lacked some NBA routine his comeback season...


But again, the Spurs won the championship in the lockout abbreviated 1999 season despite being the third oldest team in the league (and older than the current Mavericks), plus they had a few new faces in their core rotation on top of that. At the end of the day, none of those factors stood in the way of them winning it all. If the talent is there and they stay healthy and in shape, I don't think it will really be an issue.
User avatar
Andrew
Retro Basketball Gamer
Administrator
 
Posts: 115168
Joined: Thu Aug 22, 2002 8:51 pm
Location: Australia

Re: The "who's better?" thread

Postby _Steve_ on Mon Aug 08, 2011 10:57 pm

Andrew wrote:But again, the Spurs won the championship in the lockout abbreviated 1999 season despite being the third oldest team in the league (and older than the current Mavericks), plus they had a few new faces in their core rotation on top of that. At the end of the day, none of those factors stood in the way of them winning it all. If the talent is there and they stay healthy and in shape, I don't think it will really be an issue.


We'll see. ;) As I already said, I refered to a quote from Nowitzki which in a way reminded me of MJs return. I have to admit, I clearly forgot about the Spurs in '99...
“Get your facts first, then you can distort them as you please.” - Mark Twain
User avatar
_Steve_
 
Posts: 1652
Joined: Fri Jan 08, 2010 9:09 pm
Location: Hannover, Germany

Re: The "who's better?" thread

Postby Andrew on Mon Aug 08, 2011 11:06 pm

Sure, nothing is guaranteed. But it is worth noting that the one and only time a lockout has caused a stoppage and change to the schedule like the one we may be facing this time around, it was one of the oldest teams in the league that ended up winning the championship.
User avatar
Andrew
Retro Basketball Gamer
Administrator
 
Posts: 115168
Joined: Thu Aug 22, 2002 8:51 pm
Location: Australia

Re: The "who's better?" thread

Postby _Steve_ on Mon Aug 08, 2011 11:15 pm

I agree, statistically we have no sufficiant information. ;) Let's just hope the lockout does not consume a big part of the season and theese discussion might be obsolete...
“Get your facts first, then you can distort them as you please.” - Mark Twain
User avatar
_Steve_
 
Posts: 1652
Joined: Fri Jan 08, 2010 9:09 pm
Location: Hannover, Germany

Previous

Return to NBA & Basketball

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 5 guests