Yes, my point exactly... the question was directed to the other forum members...
Th epoint here is: People like Charles Barkley, he's fun, an overachiever on the court, and a great commentator, so he's cool ... who cares if he doesn't have any rings..?
On the other hand: Malone is secluded, a weird character, had dellusions of grandeur, thought he was better than Jordan... he's not exactly loveable as a person... you damn right bet he's not THE MAN if he didn't get no title...
Care to see the difference here people?
