NBA FINALS "LAKERS vs. PISTONS"

Like real basketball, as well as basketball video games? Talk about the NBA, NCAA, and other professional and amateur basketball leagues here.

Who will be the 03-04 NBA Champion

Los Angeles Lakers
41
51%
Detroit Pistons
39
49%
 
Total votes : 80

Postby Charlie Martel on Mon Jun 07, 2004 11:18 pm

k08e4mvp wrote:All Im saying is 2001: 0-1, 1-1, 2-1, 3-1 and 4-1.

You're seriously comparing this year's Lakers to 2001's? The Lakers were possibly 0.4 seconds away from not even making it to the conference finals this year, whereas the '01 Lakers lost only 1 game (in OT) during the whole playoffs. :roll:
User avatar
Charlie Martel
 
Posts: 28
Joined: Thu Oct 09, 2003 2:13 pm
Location: Atlanta, GA

Postby Fresh8 on Mon Jun 07, 2004 11:39 pm

Charlie Martel wrote-

You're seriously comparing this year's Lakers to 2001's? The Lakers were possibly 0.4 seconds away from not even making it to the conference finals this year, whereas the '01 Lakers lost only 1 game (in OT) during the whole playoffs.


Your comparing this year's league to the one back in 01??? The NBA's teams weren't as good as the Lakers then! They only started to play better against LA in 02!
User avatar
Fresh8
The poster formerly known as Sit
 
Posts: 14872
Joined: Mon Nov 11, 2002 5:19 pm

Postby . on Mon Jun 07, 2004 11:47 pm

Charlie Martel wrote:
k08e4mvp wrote:All Im saying is 2001: 0-1, 1-1, 2-1, 3-1 and 4-1.

You're seriously comparing this year's Lakers to 2001's? The Lakers were possibly 0.4 seconds away from not even making it to the conference finals this year, whereas the '01 Lakers lost only 1 game (in OT) during the whole playoffs. :roll:

Im not comparing the team with 2001 and now, Im saying that they were in the exact same situation back then as they are now, losing the first game at home, also both the Sixers from then and the Pistons are great defensive teams.

Also you seem to forget that Duncan also made a lucky shot before Fisher did :roll:
.
 
Posts: 3706
Joined: Mon Nov 11, 2002 10:02 pm

Postby Wall St. Peon on Tue Jun 08, 2004 1:40 am

Quote:
Big Ben great 15 ft shot
- I wanna see him do that again!


He made 2 or 3 of them....the big one, though, was....I believe at the beginning of the 4th when the Pistons were on an 11-2 run.

Oh, and shut up Laker fans about the "pistons wanting it more." That's a cop out and disrespectful to a team who PLAYED better. Saying a team wasn't emotionally in it is sometimes the case, but that's in out and out blowouts. This would have been a blowout, but the Lakers were playing good enough D to force what, 14 turnovers? And they still lost! So don't say they were coasting or not trying....if you say that, you weren't watching the game.

The Lakers were playing hard, but the Pistons showed that their defense is as stifling as advertised. Hey, look what happened, whoever said it: Shaq and Kobe got their 50, and the rest of the team was shut down. The Lakers did not reach 80 points...and they lost. Strange, wasn't that one of my keys to the Pistons winning? :roll: This shouldn't be a surprise...to anyone.

As for the Pistons not having offense, let's talk about the Lakers not playing defense. The only one playing well on D was Kobe, and his was a little grabby on Hamilton several times (but good D regardless). Ben Wallace will be given the 15 footers, and he knows that...and he'll take them. Prince had a lot of open shots, as did Billups. Hamilton got open and they ran him off a ton of screens, and because of Kobe, he did not score or shoot well. However, Billups got Payton 4 quick fouls and then a 5th in the third quarter and he wasn't seen the rest of the game. Fisher is apparently hurt now (must be why they lost, eh? :roll:), so that's probably why he didn't play well (no one mentioned that Fish was hurt).

Compared to the Pacers, the Lakers D is as good as the Mavericks. The Lakers have one player to stop perimeter players - Kobe - and the Pistons have four players who play well on the perimeter - Hamilton, Billups, Prince (to a point), and R. Wallace. Don't even say Payton's a good perimeter player, he's pathetic nowadays...they should start Fisher.

If you watched the first game, you would know this will NOT be a cake walk for the Lakers. They won't win in five, if they win, it'll be six or seven. But I'll stand by my prediction: Pistons in seven.

If you don't agree with me...post analysis why...if you can't watch the finals, don't bother posting because you cannot analyze anything without actually seeing it.

Oh, Lakers will take game two and five....
Shane
Wall St. Peon
 
Posts: 898
Joined: Sun Oct 06, 2002 11:57 am
Location: Des Moines, IA

Postby LegoT-Mac on Tue Jun 08, 2004 2:09 am

lakers will lose to the pistons again like they did last night.
User avatar
LegoT-Mac
 
Posts: 456
Joined: Fri May 14, 2004 2:16 am
Location: Westfield, MA

Postby HowAreYao? on Tue Jun 08, 2004 2:16 am

And did anyone see the Larry Brown interview directly following the game last night?

He remembers '01 and is going to do everything within his power to make sure it doesn't happen again. Also you can tell how extremely passionate he is about his team, and about winning this championship. They are certainly the closer nit team in this Finals and that means a lot when the going gets tough. We'll just see if it's enough.

Larry Brown deserves this...
HowAreYao?
 
Posts: 54
Joined: Sat Jun 05, 2004 9:46 am
Location: Houston

Postby benji on Tue Jun 08, 2004 2:45 am

BSing Game One
Game One:
Offensive Efficiency (Points per 100 Possessions)
Pistons: 104.6
Lakers: 91.6

Regular Season Off/Def
Pistons: 99.1/92.5 (+6.6)
Lakers: 102.7/98.7 (+4.0)

Difference
Pistons: +5.5/-0.9 (+6.4 overall)
Lakers: -11.1/+5.9 (-17.0 overall)

Pistons: +13.0 in Game One.

The Pistons scored 5.5 more points than average and held the Lakers to 1 point less than their average opponent! The Lakers scored 11 points less than average and gave up 6 more points than average...Pistons were +6.4 for the game, Lakers were -17!!! MINUS 17!!!!

Stephen A. Smith and Kevin Frazier on ESPN News were flustered last night. They "reminded" us five times (Smith: four, Frazier: once) that the Lakers played great defense giving up only 87 points but the Pistons were even better. Saw this sentiment from some Laker fans across the Net last night too.

Sigh...

The Lakers defense was horrible. Flat out. To put their defense performance in perspective, if that was their season number they would've been better than only the Clippers and Magic, and just as bad as Seattle. Yes, that'd be WORSE, than Dallas. Their offense would've been worse than every team in the league.

If the Pistons put up that offensive number all season, only Sacramento and Dallas would've been better this year.

Coming into this series the Lakers defense was quite a bit below average, their offense was very good, but their defense was crap. The last part held true in Game One, except that the Pistons defense smothered the Lakers offense and the Lakers gave up playing defense.

Mike says the Lakers will come out in Game Two with traps. They're going to lose again if they do that, they do not rotate or adjust well at all and for some illogical reason the Pistons are good at breaking traps.

Game Two: I don't really know what the Lakers should do right now. I think they just need to play their game. They're supposed to be these super veterans who have been in the Finals so much and thus nothing will faze them, but the Pistons did in Game One. If I were the Lakers I'd be a little worried that the Pistons let Shaq go one-on-one for the most part, you always hear about having to stop Shaq, but if the Pistons have decided to concede 30-35 points a game to Shaq, things will be tough for the Lakers. Detroit swarmed Shaq only a few times and he turned it over those times, but I mean when Shaq went one-on-one against Corliss and no Pistons helped, that was a statement. Kobe got his 22 but he missed 17 shots in getting there. They could go to Shaq for all 80 possessions in the game and that would force the Pistons to try and stop him but we know Kobe won't allow that so things should be alright there.

The Lakers need to play their game, get out and get the pace of the game higher. This game they walked right into the Pistons game, both teams only saw 83 possessions in the game. The Lakers usually had 12 more than in a game during the regular season. (To be fair, the Pistons usually had 5-6 more than that during the season.)

The Lakers still have the two best players in this series so they SHOULD still win the series and yes, it's only one game but I hope now "everyone" will stop with this cockumbull idea that the Lakers are a good defensive team and have teh better bench that we've been hearing for the last week. :roll:

From the Pistons, I'd like to see some more Mehmo action. He's the 'stons second best rebounder and would help close the rebounding gap. Plus he did darn good against the Lakers back in November, averaged 10pts (50% shooting) 8rebs in just 22 minutes. Had 7pts 9rebs (to lead the Pistons) off the bench in the first game, 13pts 7rebs off the bench in the second game and Shaq kept fouling him when he drove. Some Darko action would be good too.

Nov 14th: Lakers 102.4 - Pistons 94.0
Nov 18th: Pistons 122.5 - Lakers 106.5
Season: Pistons 108.3 - Lakers 104.5
June 6th: Pistons 104.6 - Lakers 91.6

The Lakers didn't get the mehmo that there will be defense played this time around?

And since nearly everyone is making the comparison...

Game One, June 6, 2001: Iverson drops 48, Shaq with 44, Kobe with 15, Fox with 19 (!)
Sixers: 104.9
Lakers: 96.3

Regular Season Off/Def
Sixers: 100.7/96.2 (+4.5)
Lakers: 105.6/101.7 (+3.9)

Difference
Sixers: +4.2/+0.1 (+4.1 overall)
Lakers: -9.3/+3.2 (-12.5 overall)

Sixers: +8.6 in Game One.

The Sixers didn't dismantle the Lakers like the Pistons did, they brought a similar game plan however. That one went into OT.

Game Two, June 8, 2001: Iverson with 23, Shaq with 28, Kobe with 31
Sixers: 93.3
Lakers: 104.9

Regular Season Off/Def
Sixers: 100.7/96.2 (+4.5)
Lakers: 105.6/101.7 (+3.9)

Difference
Sixers: -7.4/+8.7 (-16.1 overall)
Lakers: -0.7/-8.4 (+7.7 overall)

Lakers: +11.6 in Game Two.
Lakers: +12.3 in Game Three. (107.9 to 95.6)
Lakers: +19.2 in Game Four. (113.5 to 94.3)
Lakers: +16.4 in Game Five. (120.3 to 103.9)

I don't expect the Lakers to suddenly become the best offensive team in NBA History against the Pistons defense like they did against the Sixers. Plus, this Lakers team doesn't have Horry, Fox (the Fox they had in 2001 who had 19 in game one and 20 in game five!), Shaw and Harper to sic on the Pistons perimeter players either. They've got Kobe and that's about it and he was looking ragged by the end of the game one from chasing Rip.
User avatar
benji
 
Posts: 14545
Joined: Sat Nov 16, 2002 9:09 am

Postby GloveGuy on Tue Jun 08, 2004 3:36 am

Malone and Payton really need to step up. They can't expect to get their first rings by watching Kobe and Shaq do whatever.

Karl's got to start hitting his shots and be more aggresive in going to the basket. He was settling for the J too much, and his shots weren't falling.

Payton should start being more aggresive on the offensive end. Usually he'd just pass the ball and watch the game flow through Kobe and Shaq. Sometimes he didn't evne take the ball up, giving the ball to Kobe before even making a dribble. He played good defense in the first half. He was really aggresive, maybe a bit too aggresive, but I thought his D was better than it had been in the previous series.

We all know that these two are physically incapable of what they used to be able to do, but they could atleast make some contributions because it's getting kind of sad how few times the got involved in the offense. Phil should give them more to set eachother up and utilize their strengths.
User avatar
GloveGuy
 
Posts: 1588
Joined: Tue Nov 12, 2002 12:55 am
Location: Boston, MA

Postby Drex on Tue Jun 08, 2004 3:55 am

Payton scored only a 3 pt shot and have foul trouble through the game by guarding the bigger billups.

You mean bigger by being heavier? Or by being taller? :?

Well, I don't have too much to say, I didn't watch the whole game, just parts of it and the 4th.
The ring-less needs to step up, they're playing for their championship, do something more than 7 points, combined!
Congratulations to the Pistons on the win, it's only one game, but if they keep playing this defense, the Lakers would find themselves in trouble.
User avatar
Drex
You bastards!!!
 
Posts: 6074
Joined: Tue Nov 12, 2002 10:48 am
Location: Iquique, Chile

Postby matmat8 on Tue Jun 08, 2004 4:19 am

Dr3x_15 wrote:
Payton scored only a 3 pt shot and have foul trouble through the game by guarding the bigger billups.
You mean bigger by being heavier? Or by being taller? :?


I think he means better :wink:
matmat8
 
Posts: 368
Joined: Fri May 28, 2004 11:11 pm
Location: france

Postby lilcheeks on Tue Jun 08, 2004 6:25 am

i believe the series will go to a game 7
but i think the pistons will pull it out in the end.
MVP chauncy billups
and we will get to see Kobe cry again.
FOR ALL YOU LAKER HATERS HERES A GREAT SITE.
www.freewebs.com/lakerssuck
heres a preview

Image

GO PISTONS!(even though my team is the bulls)
User avatar
lilcheeks
 
Posts: 40
Joined: Wed Mar 03, 2004 10:15 am
Location: El Paso TX

Postby Jackal on Tue Jun 08, 2004 6:33 am

I didn't bother to read what everyone else wrote, I hate not being able to distinguish the new posts from the old.

Anywho, on game one: Lakers sucked, Detroit owned.

The Pistons just outplayed LA, and they did it real nasty...bad boys for sure.

Shaq showed what he's capable of, he showed he is a Finals MVP type player.

Malone just couldn't hit a thing, he's had those games before, here's hoping he bounces back in game 2.

George was being agressive, he did what he was supposed to do, he did a good job on defence too.

Bryant needs to drive alot more, I know it's tough with the Wallace's but once he's drawn them towards himself a bit, he can pass it off to Shaq for the easy dunk, yay. Too much out side shooting for Kobe, they just weren't falling. Good defense by Prince.

Payton, where were you? I just saw him pick up four to five fouls...those were the only times I actually felt his presence at the game.

If Malone & Payton don't bounce back in the coming games, LA's screwed.

All in all, great game by the Pistons, this is why I wanted to see them in the Finals, this is way more fun then four - nul sweeping Indy.

In short, good game by the Pistons, watch for LA to bounce back though.

Welcome to the Finals. :)


Edit: Who ever posted above of me: that's probably the saddest website I've ever seen...someone would actually spend their time making a website of such a "faggotty" ball club, unbelievable. Oh, that fagotty team has been the NBA Champions for the last 3 out of 4 years, must be real faggots if the other faggotts cant beat them. The Queens come to mind, I would refer to them as Queers. Not LA. Anyways, I won't stoop to the level of that site maker, so kudos to the Kings to making it to wherever they did. They would have made an interesting matchup in the Western Conference Finals...but alas, we had to make do with Minny.

Oh, LA in 6.
User avatar
Jackal
 
Posts: 14877
Joined: Fri Mar 21, 2003 2:59 am

Postby Jay-Peso on Tue Jun 08, 2004 6:40 am

I still stand stong with my choice( LA will win). It's only one game and there are atleast 3 more to go. They got a lot of chances left but they can't burn them all. We will see but the game last night was kind of bad to watch because of how the Lakers were playing with the exception of Shaq.

:shock:
Image
What you know bout that?
User avatar
Jay-Peso
 
Posts: 1704
Joined: Sat Nov 01, 2003 7:46 am
Location: United States

Postby Amphatoast on Tue Jun 08, 2004 9:00 am

Image

click on that and it will automatically go to new posts and skip past the ones you already seen already.
Amphatoast
 
Posts: 3004
Joined: Wed Jul 02, 2003 5:45 am
Location: new york

Postby VMS on Tue Jun 08, 2004 11:08 am

Pistons in 7
Image
User avatar
VMS
 
Posts: 364
Joined: Wed May 12, 2004 4:32 am

Postby Charlie Martel on Tue Jun 08, 2004 3:05 pm

Sit-KB8 wrote:Your comparing this year's league to the one back in 01??? The NBA's teams weren't as good as the Lakers then! They only started to play better against LA in 02!

My whole point was that this year's Lakers aren't nearly as dominate as the one in '01. I'm not buying the "the league wasen't as good then as it is now!" In '99 the Spurs swept the Lakers right out of the playoffs. In 2000 the Lakers relied on one of the (if not the?) biggest fourth quarter collapses ever in playoffs history from from the Blazers in game 7 of the Western Conference Finals. The 2001 Lakers were never close to being defeated in a series. The '01 Lakers team was just that much better than the other Laker teams that won those three championships (and possibly this year's, if they do indeed win it). :D

k08e4mvp wrote:Im not comparing the team with 2001 and now, Im saying that they were in the exact same situation back then as they are now, losing the first game at home, also both the Sixers from then and the Pistons are great defensive teams.

From your post I got the feeling you were saying the Lakers will sweep the next four just like the '01 team. I think that would be much more difficult considering this year's Lakers are not as good as the one in 2001 and the 2001 Sixers aren't as good as the 2004 Pistons. :)

k08e4mvp wrote:Also you seem to forget that Duncan also made a lucky shot before Fisher did :roll:

I never said anything about luck. I just said they were possibly 0.4 to being out of playoff competition, not that "they were lucky Fisher saved them with a lucky shot". The 2001 Lakers never had a chance to being defeated by a lucky Tim Duncan shot. <--- my whole point that I've tried to make enough times in this post. :lol:
User avatar
Charlie Martel
 
Posts: 28
Joined: Thu Oct 09, 2003 2:13 pm
Location: Atlanta, GA

Postby Fresh8 on Tue Jun 08, 2004 5:34 pm

Man Psycho...u actually visited that site???
User avatar
Fresh8
The poster formerly known as Sit
 
Posts: 14872
Joined: Mon Nov 11, 2002 5:19 pm

Postby MaD_hAND1e on Tue Jun 08, 2004 5:40 pm

I'd have to say that for the Lakers to win this series, Payton and Malone have to step up. After watching a lot of televised Lakers games (on ESPN), I can't see how Payton and Malone were superstars on their respective teams prior to this season. Maybe its because of their readjusted roles, or age, but I think they need to step up at this point to get a ring. As much as I'd like to see the Pistons win the championship, I think the Mailman and the Glove deserve a ring before closing out their careers.
User avatar
MaD_hAND1e
 
Posts: 1271
Joined: Mon Nov 11, 2002 5:09 pm

Postby hmm on Tue Jun 08, 2004 8:30 pm

.
Last edited by hmm on Fri Jun 05, 2009 4:42 am, edited 1 time in total.
hmm
 
Posts: 2058
Joined: Mon Dec 08, 2003 2:06 am

Postby . on Tue Jun 08, 2004 8:43 pm

Charlie Martel wrote:
Sit-KB8 wrote:Your comparing this year's league to the one back in 01??? The NBA's teams weren't as good as the Lakers then! They only started to play better against LA in 02!

My whole point was that this year's Lakers aren't nearly as dominate as the one in '01. I'm not buying the "the league wasen't as good then as it is now!" In '99 the Spurs swept the Lakers right out of the playoffs. In 2000 the Lakers relied on one of the (if not the?) biggest fourth quarter collapses ever in playoffs history from from the Blazers in game 7 of the Western Conference Finals. The 2001 Lakers were never close to being defeated in a series. The '01 Lakers team was just that much better than the other Laker teams that won those three championships (and possibly this year's, if they do indeed win it). :D

k08e4mvp wrote:Im not comparing the team with 2001 and now, Im saying that they were in the exact same situation back then as they are now, losing the first game at home, also both the Sixers from then and the Pistons are great defensive teams.

From your post I got the feeling you were saying the Lakers will sweep the next four just like the '01 team. I think that would be much more difficult considering this year's Lakers are not as good as the one in 2001 and the 2001 Sixers aren't as good as the 2004 Pistons. :)

k08e4mvp wrote:Also you seem to forget that Duncan also made a lucky shot before Fisher did :roll:

I never said anything about luck. I just said they were possibly 0.4 to being out of playoff competition, not that "they were lucky Fisher saved them with a lucky shot". The 2001 Lakers never had a chance to being defeated by a lucky Tim Duncan shot. <--- my whole point that I've tried to make enough times in this post. :lol:

Im not saying this because I believe the Lakers will have a 4-0 run now, I was just saying that the Lakers have been in the same situation before, and I get the idea that alot of people think that its over because they lost their first game, which is not the case thats why I brought up the 2001 part.
.
 
Posts: 3706
Joined: Mon Nov 11, 2002 10:02 pm

Postby Bang on Tue Jun 08, 2004 10:40 pm

Detroit in 4...
PUHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
I haven't heard such a hilarious thing in years.
Did you all forget Lakers came from a 2-0 deficit against the Spurs? The Spurs are a much better team that Detroit.
You know what, because the Lakers lost game 1 they will be much much more competitive the next game. Oh they wil.
Oh yea
-Hamilton being better than Kobe? yea, Hamilton really played well..yea right.
-Sheed dominating against Malone? What, where?
- "we have 4 7 footers, they'll stop Shaq" oh man was that so wrong.

Don't count on Billups to have another lucky night.
In fact I think this game 1 win will make the Lakers win in 5 since the Lakers now have gotten an earlier wake up call.
User avatar
Bang
 
Posts: 1312
Joined: Wed Jun 18, 2003 11:16 pm

Postby hmm on Tue Jun 08, 2004 10:44 pm

.
Last edited by hmm on Sat Jun 06, 2009 6:48 am, edited 1 time in total.
hmm
 
Posts: 2058
Joined: Mon Dec 08, 2003 2:06 am

Postby Fresh8 on Tue Jun 08, 2004 11:42 pm

Man- Jack Nicholson is a true fan! Read this and ive us a bit of feed back!

The Lakers' Leading Man Always Knows His Lines

He is a player — ask anyone in Hollywood — but the old point guard hasn't so much as hit a free throw in well over 30 years with the Lakers.

Jack Nicholson still rides the bench, always on the visitors' end, in one of Staples Center's $1,900-a-game courtside seats where he's a few feet from the opposing team's coach. He sits hunched, his feet planted wide, wearing his trademark shades and black jacket. He does things that never show up in the box score.

He chides, he talks trash, he charms and distracts.

When the action heats up — when a dubious foul call costs Gary Payton a basket or puts Shaquille O'Neal on the sidelines — Nicholson comes off the bench with his best moves: the brandished fists, the crazed-looking Randle P. McMurphy yells, the two-hands-at-the-throat choke sign. He directed the full repertoire at referees last week when the Lakers eliminated the Minnesota Timberwolves to advance to the National Basketball Assn. Finals, and he is back in action against the Detroit Pistons.

With the Pistons leading the Lakers, one game to none, Nicholson is sure to be in his accustomed spot for tonight's Game 2, just as he nearly always is when the Lakers play at home, whether in the playoffs or regular season.

The 67-year-old actor may not be the official face of the Lakers' franchise, but he is among the most enduring. He was there when Jerry West and Wilt Chamberlain led the team in the late 1960s and early 1970s. He suffered the doldrums of the mid-1970s. He and his friend Lou Adler, the renowned music producer, who still sits alongside him, cheered the team's return to glory in the 1980s behind Magic Johnson and Kareem Abdul-Jabbar.

When the Lakers broke through and finally beat their old rivals, the Boston Celtics, for the NBA title, in 1985, Nicholson was there at Boston Garden. Celtic fans stamped his likeness on T-shirts bearing the slogan "Hit the Road, Jack" — images captured, along with numerous other Nicholson moments, in a newly released DVD history of the Lakers put out by the NBA and Warner Home Video.

What the DVDs don't show is Nicholson's purported mooning of the Boston crowd, a moment that may forever be a part of Laker playoff lore.

"I would have paid the price of admission to see that one," said veteran television commentator Stu Lantz, who had not yet joined the Lakers. "When we're out of town, especially during the playoffs, somebody will inevitably come dressed up as Jack. Not only is he well-recognized, but they try to imitate him, as well.

"He's almost becoming the voice of the fans to some degree," Lantz said. "The fans are starting to look at Jack for some of their responses [to what happens on the floor]."

For good or bad, that is one of the intangibles that Nicholson brings to the game. Fans incited by Nicholson's antics have been known to throw debris onto the court. NBA spokesman Tim Frank said he was unaware of any complaints filed with the league because of Nicholson's behavior, but the actor's outbursts have long made good sports-page copy.

Years ago, when Dick Motta was the coach of the Dallas Mavericks, Motta accused Nicholson of "goosing" him — a charge perhaps made in jest. Nicholson said he was only telling Motta to sit down.

Nicholson used to say the same to Flip Saunders, the sideline-pacing coach of the Timberwolves. They carried on a running dialogue throughout the Lakers' six-game victory over Minnesota. In the clincher, when Derek Fisher was called for a foul with the Lakers holding to a slim lead, Nicholson stood and jawed at the officials until Saunders intervened and motioned Nicholson to have a seat.

Moments later, Nicholson was up again, launching a tirade as the whole crowd stood and booed the referees.

"Half the time he calls me Flip, the other half of the time he calls me Skip," Saunders said of Nicholson before their Game 6 encounter. "But he's a great fan. He's trying to get the Lakers pumped up. You love to see people show the passion he does for the game."

Nicholson is anything but an annoyance or a distraction, Saunders said, smiling, but he conceded he has been influenced by Nicholson's heckling.

"My first year … he was on me because I never sit down. [He'd say,] 'Get out of the way, I paid for these seats,' and everything else," Saunders said. "I've tried to be a little more aware of where I'm at, maybe move up the floor, to not be in his way as much."

Abdul-Jabbar, the NBA's all-time leading scorer, said of Saunders, "He may not realize he's being worked by Jack. Jack's working him, that's for sure."

Nicholson does whatever he can to gain an edge for the Lakers.

"What people don't understand about Jack is, Jack played point guard in high school" near Asbury Park, N.J., Abdul-Jabbar said in an interview. "It was the only thing he liked and lived for — basketball. He probably got all his aggressions out, when he could, on the court. He loves the game. … He's just a gym rat. He played the game 12 months a year."

Abdul-Jabbar said he met and befriended Nicholson in 1975, the year the Lakers acquired the superstar center, and the same year Nicholson won his first Academy Award, for "One Flew Over the Cuckoo's Nest." The film happened to showcase Nicholson on the court, teaching basketball to a bunch of asylum inpatients. ("You ever play this game, Chief? Come on, I'll show you. An old Indian game — it's called, 'Put the ball in the hole.' ")

Nicholson rarely grants interviews about his love of the Lakers, a hobby he considers part of his private life. More than a year ago, he agreed to a question-and-answer with sportscaster Jim Gray, which ran in The Times, in which he extolled the unscripted nature of the sport.

"Every year's different," he said. "It's a great thing for someone like me to … get out and be entertained by something that you don't know what the end is going to be. There are always new stories every year. I love that."

He also talked about golf — he's played with Michael Jordan and President Clinton — and his frustrations with a Laker team that is often inconsistent during the regular season, despite having great talent.

"I used to be mad at this Laker team — why they don't come out of the box like Magic's teams did, or whatever — but that's the way the game is played these days," Nicholson said. "Pretty much, you have to be aware that they're looking at the entire season … keeping the goal in mind of winning the championship."

When he's out of town, Nicholson has Laker game tapes sent to him. Los Angeles-based writer Craig Modderno, who has written about Nicholson while covering entertainment and sports, said the months the actor spent in London shooting "Batman" were the only time he agreed to a lengthy shooting schedule that conflicted with the Lakers' season.

Nicholson sat higher in the stands during his earlier years as a fan, but became a courtside fixture while the Lakers were still playing at the Forum.

"He always sat on the side closest to the opponents' bench," Modderno said. In fact, a story circulates that Nicholson was initially assigned two courtside seats on the Lakers' side when Staples Center was about to open, according to Modderno. "Apparently, he on his own volition found out who had the comparable seats and asked to switch," so he could be nearer the visitors.

"I don't think he wants to be a distraction to the home team," Modderno said. "He knows a lot of the players, and they're friends of his. Besides, he can psych out the other team when he's over there."

Laker spokesman John Black said he was unaware of Nicholson's originally assigned seat location. Staples Center is one of a relatively few arenas where fans are able to sit in courtside seats between the team benches and the scorer's table. There are eight such seats on the visitors' side, including Nicholson's two and Adler's pair, and eight more next to the Lakers' bench. Altogether, including those lining the opposite side of the floor, Staples Center has 124 courtside seats that cost $1,900 apiece, per game, during the Lakers' regular season.

During the playoffs, the price goes up. For this week's Finals, the face value is $2,300 per ticket.

"We've had people offer us a half-million [dollars] for a pair of those seats," Black said. "There's none available."

Nicholson does pay for his own, Black said.

Usually two or three red-jacketed Staples Center security guards sit or patrol behind Nicholson's row, making sure he and others are not disturbed.

At halftime, Nicholson often makes a short walk past the end of the court and into the guarded tunnel beneath the stands, joining regulars such as Dyan Cannon and Denzel Washington in a VIP lounge known as "The Room."

The wood-paneled bar becomes a vibrant hot spot of music and film industry glitterati for all of 15 minutes — until the second half of the game starts.

Former Laker coach Mike Dunleavy, who now coaches the Clippers, remembers putting up with Nicholson's banter since 1977, when Dunleavy was a rookie player with the Philadelphia 76ers. The barbs were always good-humored — "little quips about plays, or refs" — and continue to be, Dunleavy said.

"He might say, 'Why are you picking on Shaq? What has he done to you?' — and I might respond, 'Other than kick my butt most of the game?' " Dunleavy said.

If a call goes the Lakers' way, Dunleavy might say, "You must be giving that ref your autograph after the game."

Del Harris, a former Laker head coach who is now an assistant with the Mavericks, also has noticed that Nicholson likes "the tete-a-tete with the opposing coaches more than getting to know the Laker coach."

When Harris began his tenure with the Lakers in 1994-95, he lost face time — and never got to play golf with Nicholson, as they once had talked about.

"I don't think I was as popular with him as I had been as the opponent," Harris said. "I know we had a point of disagreement early over [Laker reserve] George Lynch. He saw him as our best player, and I saw him as a good role player only.

Oh, well. It is too bad that Jack did not sit in the courtside seats next to the Lakers, because he would have gotten an entirely different experience."

Harris said fans near him got to know the Lakers' plays, and Harris would occasionally allow one of the courtside fans to decide what play to send in late in a one-sided game. If the call worked, Harris and the fan would exchange "a subtle low-five" — a celebratory moment Nicholson might have loved.

"I would have given Jack the chance," he said.
[/quote]
User avatar
Fresh8
The poster formerly known as Sit
 
Posts: 14872
Joined: Mon Nov 11, 2002 5:19 pm

Postby . on Tue Jun 08, 2004 11:58 pm

If I had the money I would do the same, maybe even more :P. Most famous persons with money who attend NBA games are die hard fans
.
 
Posts: 3706
Joined: Mon Nov 11, 2002 10:02 pm

Postby Fresh8 on Wed Jun 09, 2004 12:05 am

k08e4mvp-

If I had the money I would do the same, maybe even more . Most famous persons with money who attend NBA games are die hard fans


Well u see...ur wrong on that one cause half of those ppl who are on the courtside arent real fans... theyre in for the free tickets and are part of the bandwagon...also because they want to be photograghed! I mean look at Justin Timberlake!
User avatar
Fresh8
The poster formerly known as Sit
 
Posts: 14872
Joined: Mon Nov 11, 2002 5:19 pm

PreviousNext

Return to NBA & Basketball

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 7 guests