BSing Game One
Game One:
Offensive Efficiency (Points per 100 Possessions)
Pistons: 104.6
Lakers: 91.6
Regular Season Off/Def
Pistons: 99.1/92.5 (+6.6)
Lakers: 102.7/98.7 (+4.0)
Difference
Pistons: +5.5/-0.9 (+6.4 overall)
Lakers: -11.1/+5.9 (-17.0 overall)
Pistons: +13.0 in Game One.
The Pistons scored 5.5 more points than average and held the Lakers to 1 point less than their average opponent! The Lakers scored 11 points less than average and gave up 6 more points than average...Pistons were +6.4 for the game, Lakers were -17!!! MINUS 17!!!!
Stephen A. Smith and Kevin Frazier on ESPN News were flustered last night. They "reminded" us five times (Smith: four, Frazier: once) that the Lakers played great defense giving up only 87 points but the Pistons were even better. Saw this sentiment from some Laker fans across the Net last night too.
Sigh...
The Lakers defense was horrible. Flat out. To put their defense performance in perspective, if that was their season number they would've been better than only the Clippers and Magic, and just as bad as Seattle. Yes, that'd be WORSE, than Dallas. Their offense would've been worse than every team in the league.
If the Pistons put up that offensive number all season, only Sacramento and Dallas would've been better this year.
Coming into this series the Lakers defense was quite a bit below average, their offense was very good, but their defense was crap. The last part held true in Game One, except that the Pistons defense smothered the Lakers offense and the Lakers gave up playing defense.
Mike says the Lakers will come out in Game Two with traps. They're going to lose again if they do that, they do not rotate or adjust well at all and for some illogical reason the Pistons are good at breaking traps.
Game Two: I don't really know what the Lakers should do right now. I think they just need to play their game. They're supposed to be these super veterans who have been in the Finals so much and thus nothing will faze them, but the Pistons did in Game One. If I were the Lakers I'd be a little worried that the Pistons let Shaq go one-on-one for the most part, you always hear about having to stop Shaq, but if the Pistons have decided to concede 30-35 points a game to Shaq, things will be tough for the Lakers. Detroit swarmed Shaq only a few times and he turned it over those times, but I mean when Shaq went one-on-one against Corliss and no Pistons helped, that was a statement. Kobe got his 22 but he missed 17 shots in getting there. They could go to Shaq for all 80 possessions in the game and that would force the Pistons to try and stop him but we know Kobe won't allow that so things should be alright there.
The Lakers need to play their game, get out and get the pace of the game higher. This game they walked right into the Pistons game, both teams only saw 83 possessions in the game. The Lakers usually had 12 more than in a game during the regular season. (To be fair, the Pistons usually had 5-6 more than that during the season.)
The Lakers still have the two best players in this series so they SHOULD still win the series and yes, it's only one game but I hope now "everyone" will stop with this cockumbull idea that the Lakers are a good defensive team and have teh better bench that we've been hearing for the last week.
From the Pistons, I'd like to see some more Mehmo action. He's the 'stons second best rebounder and would help close the rebounding gap. Plus he did darn good against the Lakers back in November, averaged 10pts (50% shooting) 8rebs in just 22 minutes. Had 7pts 9rebs (to lead the Pistons) off the bench in the first game, 13pts 7rebs off the bench in the second game and Shaq kept fouling him when he drove. Some Darko action would be good too.
Nov 14th: Lakers 102.4 - Pistons 94.0
Nov 18th: Pistons 122.5 - Lakers 106.5
Season: Pistons 108.3 - Lakers 104.5
June 6th: Pistons 104.6 - Lakers 91.6
The Lakers didn't get the mehmo that there will be defense played this time around?
And since nearly everyone is making the comparison...
Game One, June 6, 2001: Iverson drops 48, Shaq with 44, Kobe with 15, Fox with 19 (!)
Sixers: 104.9
Lakers: 96.3
Regular Season Off/Def
Sixers: 100.7/96.2 (+4.5)
Lakers: 105.6/101.7 (+3.9)
Difference
Sixers: +4.2/+0.1 (+4.1 overall)
Lakers: -9.3/+3.2 (-12.5 overall)
Sixers: +8.6 in Game One.
The Sixers didn't dismantle the Lakers like the Pistons did, they brought a similar game plan however. That one went into OT.
Game Two, June 8, 2001: Iverson with 23, Shaq with 28, Kobe with 31
Sixers: 93.3
Lakers: 104.9
Regular Season Off/Def
Sixers: 100.7/96.2 (+4.5)
Lakers: 105.6/101.7 (+3.9)
Difference
Sixers: -7.4/+8.7 (-16.1 overall)
Lakers: -0.7/-8.4 (+7.7 overall)
Lakers: +11.6 in Game Two.
Lakers: +12.3 in Game Three. (107.9 to 95.6)
Lakers: +19.2 in Game Four. (113.5 to 94.3)
Lakers: +16.4 in Game Five. (120.3 to 103.9)
I don't expect the Lakers to suddenly become the best offensive team in NBA History against the Pistons defense like they did against the Sixers. Plus, this Lakers team doesn't have Horry, Fox (the Fox they had in 2001 who had 19 in game one and 20 in game five!), Shaw and Harper to sic on the Pistons perimeter players either. They've got Kobe and that's about it and he was looking ragged by the end of the game one from chasing Rip.