1CenT wrote:The X wrote:Laxation wrote:The rules have been changed to stop team basketball, instead theyre promoting a single player winning. I can't stand it.
Flopping doesnt help either, while Im bitching about things...
that's why I follow college basketball a lot more than NBA....sure the level of talent isn't there, but it seems to be more about team basketball....
How often do you see a single player "winning it"
Look at tonight.. how many points did Lebron score?
Look at the Pistons and Spurs...
Look at LA and Kobe, u got 1 person up there alright... are they winning? Are you on crack? Wake up this is team basketball.. i think Kevin Durant and Melo showed what super talent is like in an inferior (talent-wise) league/game(college) ...
Lebron did it in game 5... he showed how much bigger, stronger, faster and skilled(not exactly, but he was on fire alright)...
Why many experts and non experts kept our jaws opened for hours and hours is because it doesn't happen very often..
I don't know what you are talking about 1CenT, you must have directed that at Laxation as I just stated that I prefer college basketball because it seems to be more of about team basketball than the NBA....I never said that there is no such a thing as team basketball in the NBA, as the game of basketball is 5-on-5, so regardless of the level, it is a team game....
to argue your point, the rules introduced into the NBA clearly promote single player dominance....you can't touch a player on the perimeter or when he is on the move with the ball....look what Dwayne Wade did in last year's Finals, it was an utter disgrace IMHO....I'm a big fan of Wade & not to take away from some of the amazing things he did last year, but the flopping & touch fouls were just plain ridiculous....it's not the player's fault either, they are just playing within the rules set by the league....
onto the flopping topic, I'm the type of person that believes that deliberate & blatant flopping should get a player a technical....and I believe that diving in soccer should get players red cards, or yellow at the very least (look what happened to Italy in World Cup, they dove over an Australian player & won the game & then ended up winning World Cup....bad behaviour is rewarded)....
your argument is that college basketball talent is inferior, but that is not an argument you can make as I had already stated in my initial comment that despite the lack of talent of the college level, I still prefer it....
but this is just me....I've never awed over Allen Iverson....a great individual talent, but I just hate to see get the ball to Iverson, isolation, Iverson shoots/drives/crossover whatever....that isn't my cup of tea....I don't like Cavs play as to me, it seems similar....the fact Lebron is a good passer & found open Daniel Gibson was great, it got them the W....for me, I enjoy watching Phoenix (for obvious reasons), but I also enjoy watching more team-oriented play of Spurs & Jazz....I appreciate the team basketball played by those teams....but those teams are not single player teams....
Andrew wrote:Laxation wrote:A no-call on a flop isnt enough. Tech fouls should be given. I realise this will end up being just another subjective call that ends up being bitched and moaned about, but it surely has to work on some level...
In my opinion assessing a technical foul on flops is just going to slow the game up and cause even more problems as what constitutes a flop is going to vary from referee to referee. A non-call can effectively punish a player (and hence his team) for flopping on defense by allowing play to go on with a defender on the floor and out of the play giving up a wide open jumper or path to the hoop. Similarly, a player who throws up a wild shot on a wild flail intended to draw a foul will be punished by the non-call by a wasted possession.
If there's no reward for it, there's no incentive to do it.
good point there Andrew, a non-call would be better....that happens a bit in my local competition & it works well