I guess you're right that jerry buss is not a disrespectful owner in general, but I for one consider choosing kobe over shaq a great insult and slap to the face.
Ah yes. Dr. Buss didnt have to choose anyways if Shaq did not demand a trade. Kobe was the only free agent that season. Shaq was not traded against his will. Heck, Buss even respected his request to be traded to a warm weather city.
Every single one of those 'reasons' is not a proven fact, just speculation.
How is trading a player just a speculation?
The lakers not matching the warriors offer is not speculation either. Fish repeatedly said he wanted to remain a laker for life but the NBA is a business.
phil jackson - gone
You may be right about this one. But he returned anyways.
karl malone - gone
Get your facts straight. Karl malone - retired and never considered playing for the heat and even leaned on returning to the lakers before the "mexican girl" incident.
gary payton - gone
He was traded AGAINST HIS WILL. How is that jumping ship? He was even mad that he was traded.
rick fox - gone
Again, be specific and stick to the facts. He was trade along with Payton and decided to retire. Is still a very visible figure in the lakers org till today.
Those are facts.
Uh yeah they were gone, but why do you refrain from accepting the specific facts? Yes, being traded and retiring is FACT NOT SPECULATION.
Saying derek fisher would've stayed if la had offered him more money is not a fact. Saying karl malone would've come back to la if he retired is not a fact. Saying gary payton would've played for la is not a fact. Those are hypotheticals.
Good job putting a twist to my post again.
Of course, you probably missed the interviews in the offseason with Fish, Malone and you obviously missed Gary Payton not reporting to Boston to take a physical which led to la giving up Marcus Banks and adding a 1st round pick.
Again, how can the aforementioned be hypotheticals when players have made statements?
That said, in this case, we're both dealing with primarily hypotheticals, but realize that you believing in your 'reasons' is not sufficient to it being 'factual' or 'true' to anyone but you. i have no problem with arguing reasons, but don't misinterpret your reason as fact.
No, you're simply refusing to admit you a wrong statement that majority of the players jumped ship. How can a player jump ship when:
a. he was traded
b. got offered a contract higher than his market value
c. retired(this can be arguable but considering Malone made a statement before the mexican girl incident that he would only return to the lakers when he gets healthy and will not play for any other team)
that said the only laker i can defintely say jumped ship is pj. on the other hand, you can't name one core laker that, without argument, didn't.
Ok ok it seems you're admitting to your mistake already.
I cant? Why is it so hard to understand that GP, Fox and Rush were traded. There's no way in hell anyone would consider a traded player as one that jumped ship.
There you go, i named 3. Let me name another core player in the triangle off the bench: Luke Walton.
I could make a case for Brian Cook but he's not worth it.
now let me ask you your honest opinion on something: what do you think would have happenned if kobe had left instead of shaq?
1st year without Kobe: 1st round and out.
PG: Chucky
SG: GULP George
SF: Walton
PF: Mihm
C: Snaq
Yes, that would have been our lineup. You be the judge.
2nd season: Let's assume Snaq will have the same numbers he had with the heat this season. Let's say he also attracts the same FA's he attracted in miami.
PG: Gary Payton
SG: GULP George
SF: Antoine Walker
PF: Mihm
C: Snaq
This team may not even make the playoffs considering Shaq's big decline and no. of games missed.
Hell i even made Mihm a pf just so the lineup would look decent.
what relevance is this? its not even a good analogy. We're talking about people leaving la because shaq left. Whether or not they followed shaq to wherever he went is of no consequence. The fact that shaq attracted the likes of gp to follow him as he left speaks even more to his greatness.
It is as relevant as your previous analogy. Yes, we're talking about people leaving la because Shaq left and the only one you can point out without flaws is Phil Jackson.
Honestly, if Shaq still has the same pull as he had, how come Finley opted to play with San Antonio for less money? How come Malone stayed in retirement? How come Fisher signed with GS when Miami was also ofdering him a contract that offseason?
here's another fact: shaq wanted a new contract. jerry buss said no. if buss had given him the contract he wouldn't have asked to be traded. See how simple it is when you look at the facts?
Get your facts straight.
Shaq was asking for a maximum contract extension AKA 30 million a year and growing.
Dr Buss said no, will you play for slightly less to give us a little flexibility to sign players for the MLE and LLE? Could you help us Shaq?
Shaq whined like a bitch, called Dr. Buss a motherfucker and later demanded a trade to a warm weather city. He got traded to Miami, contract was extended but he resigned for less. See how simple it is when you get your facts straight?
If Shaq was such a class act and wanted to help the lakers, why wouldnt he take a lsight paycut with the lakers? But he took one with miami.
He obviously wanted the lakers to be crippled financially therefore rendering them unable to resign Kobe Bryant and sign other key players to help the organization.
i'm not worried now
You will be soon.
