Sun Aug 28, 2005 9:42 pm
Sun Aug 28, 2005 10:02 pm
His assist numbers prove he's not a black hole; a complete ballhog wouldn't average six assists per game. It's more a matter of dominating the ball at the wrong times than being a completely selfish player.
just because tmac had a superior team compared to kobe and marbury and he made it to the postseason, he is a level up ahead of them, put kobe on that rockets team and ill bet you he would have got them to the 2nd round...
Sun Aug 28, 2005 11:09 pm
who do you think is better: Queen Elizabeth II or a T-Rex?
Mon Aug 29, 2005 1:50 am
Mon Aug 29, 2005 2:04 am
Mon Aug 29, 2005 4:08 am
boconcio wrote:the difference between t-mac and wade is: focus on winning.
t-mac wants to get big stats and give people a show basketball.
wade just want to win, he is happy as long as he can contribute to team success.
of course t-mac wants to win also, but his stats come first, it's not like kobe that the main reason he plays ball is to get a reg. season mvp and score 35 ppg, but he is not focused on winning but on putting up big numbers every night.
so that's it... t-mac can be more complete in terms of the positions he can play, he also can put up big numbers in every stat category, but in terms of leadership (yep, he is so young and yet has great leadership skills) and teamwork and winning focus wade is by far superior.
Mon Aug 29, 2005 4:20 am
Its_asdf wrote:who do you think is better: Queen Elizabeth II or a T-Rex?
OMG QUWEEN ELIZABEX ROXXXORS TEH DINOSAR!
Mon Aug 29, 2005 5:46 pm
Jae wrote:Its_asdf wrote:who do you think is better: Queen Elizabeth II or a T-Rex?
OMG QUWEEN ELIZABEX ROXXXORS TEH DINOSAR!
You'd pick an old woman over a giant lizard that eats people for fun?
Mon Aug 29, 2005 9:44 pm
just_decent wrote:wow, funny to see a double standard being held here. kobe averages 5 a game and he gets knocked for being a ballhog, starbury averages over 8 a game and he gets knocked also... aren't they the same type of players, one that needs to dominate the ball to succeed, just because tmac had a superior team compared to kobe and marbury and he made it to the postseason, he is a level up ahead of them, put kobe on that rockets team and ill bet you he would have got them to the 2nd round...
Mon Aug 29, 2005 10:40 pm
just_decent wrote:wow, funny to see a double standard being held here. kobe averages 5 a game and he gets knocked for being a ballhog, starbury averages over 8 a game and he gets knocked also... aren't they the same type of players, one that needs to dominate the ball to succeed, just because tmac had a superior team compared to kobe and marbury and he made it to the postseason, he is a level up ahead of them, put kobe on that rockets team and ill bet you he would have got them to the 2nd round...
Mon Aug 29, 2005 10:45 pm
I love passing those "it seems catchable" passes... They are just perfect! You know when the defender falls for it and lunges forward to intercept and doesn't. It frees up the attacking guy quite effectively. I love the look of disbelief on the face of my opponents... I just love it. It sometimes seems to come like Matrix style slow-motion when I get really pumped up. It's weird... I don't know if you guys have ever experienced this, but I have on a few occations and I can do marvellous things during that time.