cklitsie wrote:The top players that are supposed to be in next year's draft are all underclassmen. What if they don't enter the draft?
I'd say the 2006 draft was deeper, not necessarily because the top players in it were better but because the talent level in the 2nd round and even amongst the undrafted players was still very high.
Regardless of what happens in the 2007 draft, analysts are already saying it's one of the strongest drafts in recent years. Conversely, others are already saying that the 2006 draft was one of the weakest. Nobody in the top 10 are putting up monster numbers, although they do show promise.