NovU wrote:It's probably a tough world for Celtics fans like Sauru to understand. When was the last time any Celtic took less for the team. That franchise has been a dysfunctional pile of shit in recent era. Long loved franchise player gone to chase the ring with Russian boss, then to Washington for $$$. Yeah, that's how you bleed green. Heck, thanks to that massive fuck up, Ray bolted to give LBJ his second ring, game 6 lel.
NovU wrote:This is not an insult but you couldn't obviously tell because none of Celtics took on this kind of sacrifice in recent era. If anyone did, you'd rave about that player as well.
Jackal wrote:Florida doesn't have income tax.
Jackal wrote:Florida doesn't have income tax.
And I would agree that Tim/Dirk took less money because they wanted to win. They have made a shit load of money too and I'm pretty sure Dirk will have some front office job when he hangs it up.
Jackal wrote:What I don't understand about your logic is that you bash Kobe's contract (which I agree with from the teams point of view) but want the Heat to jeopardize the future because they "owe" Wade. Sauru points this out and you start moaning and bitching about him not understanding loyalty because Celtics this, Celtics that.
Sauru wrote:numerous athletes from boston teams (we have more than just the celtics) have taken pay cuts to put a better team on the field. i have never bragged about or called the guy a saint. when a player takes less money all it means is winning is more important than making the maximum amount he can from his salary. you need to remember that in most cases these players still get a nice pay day and end up with lots of endorsement money. these guys are not hurting and if they are its honestly their own fault. taking a pay cut is not to help the team (owners) its to help the player win more games.
A Wade associate has told people that Wade would welcome a contract averaging $20 million annually over the next three years.
For what it's worth, Henry Thomas (Wade's agent) wouldn't confirm the report, so this could be yet another rumor.
NovU wrote:Jackal wrote:Florida doesn't have income tax.
And I would agree that Tim/Dirk took less money because they wanted to win. They have made a shit load of money too and I'm pretty sure Dirk will have some front office job when he hangs it up.
So what? What is your point?
Ofc, Tim/Dirk/Wade took less money to win, to give a team better chance to win. Is there problem to this?
Or are you iterating sauru's moral standard and interpretation of the term sacrifice?Jackal wrote:What I don't understand about your logic is that you bash Kobe's contract (which I agree with from the teams point of view) but want the Heat to jeopardize the future because they "owe" Wade. Sauru points this out and you start moaning and bitching about him not understanding loyalty because Celtics this, Celtics that.
One: Wade's not asking anything near max
Two: Jeopardizing and overpaying by little is two different thing.
Three: Wade is still young and played at high level this year.
You are overreacting because I presented irrefutable double standard shown from Kobe case. Let's be clear, I didn't bash Kobe's contract but his loyal defenders that raged at simple term "overpaid"(in terms of basketball, not business).
You see, the Heat are still very much in a position to remain competitive after paying Wade his money. It's just a much friendlier contract than Kobe's contract which entirely meant lottery and rebuilding while cashing in on Kobe's last legs.Sauru wrote:numerous athletes from boston teams (we have more than just the celtics) have taken pay cuts to put a better team on the field. i have never bragged about or called the guy a saint. when a player takes less money all it means is winning is more important than making the maximum amount he can from his salary. you need to remember that in most cases these players still get a nice pay day and end up with lots of endorsement money. these guys are not hurting and if they are its honestly their own fault. taking a pay cut is not to help the team (owners) its to help the player win more games.
Let's hear some of those Celtics. Gimme some of Tim/Dirk/Wade in Green Version.
Pay cut generally is considered an unselfish act and sacrifice especially franchise players still in capable years. You are arguing against this fact with weak points. This is why it's just silly.
Say you have two equal talents but with distinctive personality. One is willing to take pay cut so that his team can retain his friend for the better chance at winning. The other one outright claims that he won't take a pay cut and scares off free agents. Which player would you criticize and commend?
Only thing you have right is that it's anyone's fault for doing anything, such as taking a pay cut, but same can be said about taking more money. That was just silly argument.
Sauru wrote:my point of view is this. everyone is saying the team should pay him now as a loyalty contract since he kept taking pay cuts to win. well if the team was horrible and he was still a max player would anyone say he should stay with the team out of loyalty? it feels like peoples opinions are very 1 sided with this.
i am just saying that it my opinion that the heat only "owe" him what he is currently worth.
Sauru wrote:yeah most likely its just the media doing what it does best and hyping a nothing situation
Sauru wrote:in the end i would like to see him retire with the heat, i always like when players go from start to finish with a team
NovU wrote:It's way too early to tell what's going to happen.
NovU wrote:I wouldn't scratch out possibility of JeremyLin-Rockets kind of offers from other teams.
Sauru wrote:you dont actually read what people write do you?
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 7 guests