Like real basketball, as well as basketball video games? Talk about the NBA, NCAA, and other professional and amateur basketball leagues here.
Fri Sep 23, 2005 6:21 pm
Did he actually donate something or just say he was thinking about it?
Fri Sep 23, 2005 7:32 pm
Jae wrote:Did he actually donate something or just say he was thinking about it?
He 'cares' and he was 'thinking about it'. But as far as actually giving money - nope. At least nobody reported about it. And believe me, if he did give a million bucks (or a considerably smaller sum), we would know about it. BTW, I'm thinking about giving 12.456.212,00$ to the poor children of Turkmenistan. If I say this on a national televison and cry while doing so - will I go to heaven?
I really can't argue with you guys giving arguments how Marbury isn't really a loser, how he just had bad luck and that sort of things. But in the of the day, he's still a loser. And if you're a top level athlete, doesn't mean that you have to have a complete lack of objectivness.
Fri Sep 23, 2005 8:39 pm
Its none of our business if he donated the money or not. He cares, and he made the press conference and as a grown man he broke down and wept. This isnt an exageration. This is what happened.
Vank.. Jealousy is a motherfucker. Just remember that.
Sat Sep 24, 2005 4:27 am
Matthew wrote:Vank.. Jealousy is a motherfucker. Just remember that.
Why would I be jealous of one ugly, underachieving, narcisstic sob? OK, he's rich and obscenely talented, but I would rather have Jaric's life

. Now, THAT's a playboy right there.
Sat Sep 24, 2005 9:39 am
Its none of our business if he donated the money or not. He cares, and he made the press conference and as a grown man he broke down and wept. This isnt an exageration. This is what happened.
Well no, it is our business because he made it our business. If you don't want people asking about your donation, don't go on national TV and announce you're thinking about donating a massive sum of money. It's simple.
Sat Sep 24, 2005 3:08 pm
Him talking about somthing doesnt make it our business. Kobe made a press conference after the rape alligation, does that mean his personal life is our business too?
The point is Stephon was saying how bad he felt about the situation. He didnt call the press conference just to say" hey i might give them some money".
And its never anybodies business about donations to such a tragedy. It's a personal decision under any circumstances.
Sat Sep 24, 2005 3:15 pm
Was he not asked about Katrina? It wasn't a "How's your offseason going Stephon?" "Million dollars for Katrina victims from ME!!!" kind of thing was it.
Sun Sep 25, 2005 12:52 am
he should have donated the money and don't tell the whole country about it.
that is an attitude of someone who cares, crying on national tv is something we see everyday, and that doesn't mean people are great citzens.
i don't like marbury, and that's not because of his trash talk. trash talking is a part of the game, i really like it. but starbury makes me sick just looking at him, he is the kind of person who is always trying to be something, always trying to tell people (and himself) he is something that he is not.
he forced his way out of minnesota so he could prove he deserved as much as KG leading another team to the playoffs and being a floor general, but he underachieved. i can only wish him a better luck next time he gets traded (cause he will get nowhere playing for the knicks).
Sun Sep 25, 2005 5:00 am
ceekay wrote:Why would you think he is selfish? Because he's never been in the right situation to REALLY win? (People tend to forget the year that the Suns gave the Spurs a good run in the first round when Amare and Marion weren't the type of impact payers they are now)
he had every chance to be on a great team but he left town. i mean the guy could have sat next to kg for his entire career and they could have had tons of success but the kid bitched and moaned and cried like the fag that he is and now he is getting what he deserves
Sun Sep 25, 2005 11:24 am
he forced his way out of minnesota so he could prove he deserved as much as KG leading another team to the playoffs and being a floor general, but he underachieved. i can only wish him a better luck next time he gets traded (cause he will get nowhere playing for the knicks).
Yeah he has
totally underachieved in comparison to KG. Garnett has been out of the first round once and Stephon hasnt. I guess thats the be all and end all of sucess these days...
But I dont understand, you criticise him for leaving minnesota, but then say he has to leave new york. Don't contradict yourself or anything

he had every chance to be on a great team but he left town. i mean the guy could have sat next to kg for his entire career and they could have had tons of success but the kid bitched and moaned and cried like the fag that he is and now he is getting what he deserves
He had one chance to play with a great player in garnett. That is hardly "
every chance to be on a great
team" is it? Of course not, but I didn't expect you to read the earlier post you retard.
It's fun to be close minded somtimes.
Heres some other beauties that people have come up with:
Iverson is so selfish, he'll never be a winner (this despite he was 3 games away from a nba championship)
Michael Jordan hurt the wizards
Chris webber is too soft to be an effective player (this despite him averaging over 20 points and 10 rebounds for his career)
Kobe shoots too much (yeah such superstars such as devean george and chucky atkins should shoo the same as him).
Carmelo is at his peak of his career, yet drafting darko was ingenius by joe dumars
Tim Duncan is a clutch player, thats why he shot 9-30 in game 7. Imagine if that was Iverson shooting 9 of 30 in an elimination game.
Sun Sep 25, 2005 11:46 am
The point is Stephon was saying how bad he felt about the situation. He didnt call the press conference just to say" hey i might give them some money".
And its never anybodies business about donations to such a tragedy. It's a personal decision under any circumstances.
Anyone with half a brain would understand that announcing to the global media that you're thinking about donating $1 million to a charity would mean people want to know if it actually happens. With the size of Marbury's head, I'm assuming he has more than half a brain. Look at it this way, when people started talking about the whole interview it was "He cried!" then it was "Stephon's such a great guy, he's going to donate a million dollars!". It was a ridiculous thing to say, but I'm assuming he got caught up in the moment or something.
Tim Duncan is a clutch player, thats why he shot 9-30 in game 7.
Ah, something in this thread I can agree with

(Y)
Sun Sep 25, 2005 1:03 pm
I can see the point you're making Jae. I just don't agree with it. Someone can genuinely feel bad for a situation without making a donation. And we dont even know that he didnt.. we just know that he was thinking about it. Since when is that such a big crime? That he cried on tv. I swear, some people are hated like no other.
Michael Jordan cried in 91, 96 and 98 after winning the championship. Same with shaq in 2000. Nobody dared to criticise them for that.
Stephon cries when thousands of people die and are in a desperate situation and he cops it for that.
Think about that for a minute..
Sun Sep 25, 2005 1:09 pm
I don't think there's anything wrong with him crying on TV at all, I credit him for it if anything... he has to be aware of the amount of hate he gets from people, so it would take a fair bit of courage to put himself out there.
Personally I think alot of guys in the NBA are overly, and unnecessarily critisised... even someone like Antoine Walker, I mean how many people can go into the NBA and average 20 a game? But of course he sucks, takes too many shots, is too selfish, team cancer etc.
Sun Sep 25, 2005 1:53 pm
i think its dumb that "hey, look at me. im crying for these peopole. will you love me? at least accept me after i made that stupid comment about being the greatest point guard HANDS DOWN"
basic response: no. im glad that you still a heart. but i still hate you for making that comment. at least take it back and rephrase it to the point you "still enjoy the rise of steve nash and jason kidd etc. to compete for the title of top pg in the nba".
this is added to what everyone else has been sayin: not a winner
Sun Sep 25, 2005 2:39 pm
Im glad he pissed you off you spastic. People like you shouldnt have a license to post.
Sun Sep 25, 2005 10:01 pm
Matthew wrote:Someone can genuinely feel bad for a situation without making a donation.
I agree, but isn't that similar to the stance of Australia/the Australian government, which you criticised? I mean, if what we did was something to be ashamed of, surely pledging or suggesting financial aid then not following through is hardly any more of a noble gesture.
Jae wrote:Personally I think alot of guys in the NBA are overly, and unnecessarily critisised... even someone like Antoine Walker, I mean how many people can go into the NBA and average 20 a game? But of course he sucks, takes too many shots, is too selfish, team cancer etc.
True, but part of the fun of being a sports fan is being an armchair analyst. I think the problem is people make the criticisms too personal or get too personally involved in the sport to the extent that they get offended or upset by things that weren't actually done to them, nor destory their life in the grand scheme of things.
But I suppose we all have our ideals when it comes to how basketball should be played and we hate to see anything happen to our favourite team or players having an adverse effect on the game. We hold athletes in such reverence that anyone who is talented but doesn't conform to a certain ideal tends to be treated as though they're committing some great injustice. Understandable even if it is unjustified and something we've probably all been guilty of at some level, at some point.
Sun Sep 25, 2005 10:10 pm
No, its different. The australian government gave indoesia $1000 000 000 000 for the tsunami, and gave america $10 million. Now I know the US is a world power, but they are (with the exception of new zealand) our closest friends and we almost turned our backs on them.
Our covergae of the situation also pissed me off. Instead of presenting the facts, it only seemed to be a "lets bash america" fest. Its a shame when people use disasters as a way to gain political leverage.
Where it varies with Stephon is his is a personal donation. It's none of mine, yours or anyone else's business. We dont know if he made the donation, and we cant form hate or criticise him simply becuase he cried or because some people assume he didnt.
Some players will always be hated.
Look at how shaq is treated in compariosn to stephon. Look at how Shaq left Orlando and L.A., and its probably worse than how Stephon left Minnesota. Yet Stephon has a leigon of haters and Shaq can get away with virtually anything
People are such sheep.
Mon Sep 26, 2005 5:25 am
Matthew wrote:Look at how shaq is treated in compariosn to stephon. Look at how Shaq left Orlando and L.A., and its probably worse than how Stephon left Minnesota. Yet Stephon has a leigon of haters and Shaq can get away with virtually anything
People are such sheep.

Before people start putting the blame on Kobe for being a dick. KG being a dick was the reason for Marbury leaving Minny. I think it's already been mentioned in this thread, but he wouldn't accept a 100 million contract or something and took 120. Screwing over the team for a while and keeping them in the first round.
Mon Sep 26, 2005 9:45 pm
(cause he will get nowhere playing for the knicks).
Yeah his really underachieved player hope he will retire asap!!!!
Mon Sep 26, 2005 10:17 pm
Colin wrote:Before people start putting the blame on Kobe for being a dick. KG being a dick was the reason for Marbury leaving Minny. I think it's already been mentioned in this thread, but he wouldn't accept a 100 million contract or something and took 120. Screwing over the team for a while and keeping them in the first round.
Very true, as much as I like KG it is a part of his career that's generally glossed over these days though I remember him copping some flak for it while it was all going on. I suppose the difference is that Marbury is more brash, more cocky, which tends to rub people the wrong way and makes it easier to portray him as villan.
Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group.
phpBB Mobile / SEO by Artodia.