Mick wrote:On a similar note, Horry has rings with 3 different teams. Does anyone know who has the most rings with different teams?
Shakes wrote:air gordon wrote:there seems to be some backlash against american/nba style play that's unwarranted.
How is it a backlash when I basically said the USA's team clearly had better players than anyone else there? All I meant was despite having man for man better talent, they didn't play well as a team. I realise that there are reasons for that (less time to prepare together, a poor mix of players selected, etc), but that really re-enforces my point: in a team sport the whole can be greater or less than the sum of its parts. You can't just whack a bunch of players together and expect it to work. It only works in cases like 92 because the players selected are so unbelievably good that all other considerations need not apply.
I mean come on, maybe 1 in 8 players in the NBA are international players? This is the best paid league on Earth that everyone wants to play in, and 7 out of 8 players are from the USA. Of course the US has the best players, anyone who tries to tell you otherwise is an idiot.
I'm not sure why some people are so defensive about all this. Getting upset because you think someone's suggesting America doesn't have the best basketballers because they lost the Olympics is like getting upset over this thread because you think it suggests Steve Kerr is better than John Stockton because of the number of championships he won. The fact is you went off on a complete tangent of a rant over something that wasn't even said.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 4 guests