by VMS on Wed Apr 13, 2005 11:27 pm
It was on NBA Fastbreak and Sportscenter this morning.
I, personally, am against any age-limit whatsoever. If this 20 year old age limit was already in place, many all-star calibur players would have 2 or so years shaved off of their careers!
Mark Jackson, Greg Anthony (both ESPN) and Jermaine O'Neal spoke out against the issue. I agree with them all too much. Surprisingly, Jermaine O'Neal was very articulate, and made a very good argument. I don't know how well they'd fare in a debate, because the only person that is for it is D. Stern and Battier.
I'd pay to see the NBA equivalent of Freddy Adu (professional soccer player from age 14).
Stern says that he wants to up the limit to 20, because there's 18 and 19 year olds that use all their focus on making it in the NBA, and neglect their family and financial responsibilities. He said, and I quote; "I don't want these kids thinking they can make it in the NBA, because they won't."
Although I think Mark Jackson is an idiot, I'll have to agree with his reason; If a team drafts a kid (under 20) and he's not ready for the NBA, that's management's fault. The kid can't prepare by himself, it's not his fault, its not the NBA's fault, its the coaches' fault.
O'Neal started his response with "As a black guy..." creating racial undertones. He clarified this morning, saying he didn't mean to imply that it is in anyway connected to racism. According to him, he said that because the NBA is a predominantly black sport, and he's right. He hasn't gotten a conversation with the commisioner yet, but I attribute this to one of two things; The Pacers-Pistons brawl, or Stern's schedule. I don't attribute anything to racism. Neither does Greg Anthony, or Mark Jackson, both ESPN analysts and phenomenal ex-NBA guards. Both are black, if it makes any difference.
In Jermaine O'Neal's words; "The NBA is doing very well. Why fix something that's not broken?"
