I said wrote:Thei defense is inpenetrable? So that explains why Seattle beat them twice, and Miami has also defeated them.
The fact of the matter is they are very beatable. They do have a great shot at winning, but they aren't definites to win it all, like some people are saying.
I never said they arent contenders, I just said they aren't invinceable. Heres the real breakdown:
Parker is an enigma, you never know what this guy will give you. Think back to the series against the lakers last year. The first 2 games he looked great, hitting jmpers, floaters, getting to the rim, working the pick and roll. They won both games, then he became invisable.. and the spurs would go on to lose 4 straight games. If they (the spurs) hopes rest on parkers inconsistant play, they are in trouble.
Manu has in fact taken his game to the next level, but being an all star doesnt mean you are a bonafide superstar. Yao Ming can tell you all about that. He and Duncan do infact make them contenders though.
As for Bowen, he does play well on the ball defense, but to say "you can always count on him to make the other team's star player almost a non-factor" is an exageration in the worst way. This is the same guy Vince carter lit up for 47 points in 3 quarters. If you honestly think bowen will be able to stop ray allen or dwayne wade for 7 games you are mistaken. He can slow them down a little bit, but not shut them down.
What you said about Tim Duncan is right, but what you said about Rasho is completely wrong. Rasho Plays O.K. defense, but is a complete non factor on the offensive end. When any team has to play 4 on 5 basketball on the offesnive end in the playoffs, they are in trouble.
And I agree, their bench does make them even better. But it doesnt make them champions in febuary.
In other words, the spurs have proved nothing yet. Yes they are contenders, but talking about it doesnt make it happen.