Andrew wrote:air gordon wrote:isn't this 90's style of play your preference?
90s style of play? What, missing layups left and right, shooting under 40% in the paint, and launching 60+ threes? Not exactly.
I have no problems with the physicality, but the officiating was oftentimes inconsistent, illogical, or just downright wrong. It didn't decide the game, but the officials looked pretty incompetent, and that's certainly not to my preference.air gordon wrote:agreed with green as the mvp. weak? nahh.
Perhaps weak is too strong of a word (ironically), but I don't think his performance has been particularly impressive. He now leads the team in scoring after that 38 point game (a number that was inflated by the stats padding at the end), and is averaging five rebounds and 4.8 assists, but he's also averaging 4.5 turnovers, hasn't shot the ball particularly well (especially by his standards) for most of the series, and hasn't really played MVP basketball for three out of the four games. If not for the play of guys like Green, Livingston, and Iguodala, the series could well be tied 2-2, or even 3-1 in the Cavs' favour. He hasn't looked like himself for 75% of the series so far.
Compare it to the great performances we've seen in past NBA Finals series, and I don't think it's nearly as impressive. Assuming he has a fine game in Game 5, I think he's got a legitimate case to be the MVP of this series. However, three very lacklustre performances and two good ones, including two games where another player put the team on their back, is not a particularly strong Finals MVP performance. Extremely weak, or completely undeserving? I probably wouldn't go that far, depending on what happens in Game 5, but like I said, it would be one of the weaker Finals MVP performances overall, compared to what others have done.
Dommy73 wrote:2K/VC jumping the gun with congratulating GSW too soon via 2K16's NBA Today
air gordon wrote:the cavs should have won this game
i am beginning to think Lue and ljames are the problem. Irving isn't a PG. he's a scorer and he's been doing that efficiently in the last 2 games. he's even playing some defense. james is hesitant. he gets into the lane with single coverage and he still passes out. he can play that bully ball card anytime he wants but he doesn't.
Sauru wrote:irving has played like shit in these finals. its like he thinks he can win it all by himself. point guard is supposed to drive the offense, not stall it
NovU wrote: I agree Irving is a scorer and not a pure PG even tho he plays the position. His Win Produced stat funnily improves among the SGs.
Problem with Irving is that he's one trick pony and average or below average in everything else he does. On nights his shots aren't falling, he's a liability. Other contenders virtually have better 2nd best players, and some have even better 3rd. KD has Bestbrook/Ibaka, Curry has like countless better teammates who are above Irving, CP3 also has two betters, Kawhi's team is balanced but Aldridge is still better than Irving. Imagine this team without LBJ. Irving as the best player, this team's lottery bound. And your best player(s) matters more in the playoffs.
Andrew wrote:I will say that that unanimous MVP selection is looking a bit shaky, right about now.
benji wrote:LeBron is such a choker. And people were talking about him as an all-time great. As having possibly surpassed Kobe. What a joke.
velvet bliss wrote:Andrew, you the real MVP.
Andrew wrote:He who flops and flails to the Finals and a title, flops and flails best.
stereoxide wrote:Max contract Barnes was non-existent in the 4th quarter missing wide open threes.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest