shadowgrin wrote:The same "criticism" can be said about LeBron's FT shooting.
Are you special? That was the point i was trying to make was you can't say one player is more dedicated than the other, didn't you at least detect the hint of sarcasm in my text? In an argument were i say "you can't say one is more dedicated" than another i end it with "Obviously LeBron is dedicated than he is". Yeesh.
I meant did the LeBron fans jump ship.shadowgrin wrote:No one jumped ship. No one sailed with the ship in the beginning anyway.
shadowgrin wrote:Two things. Those who are willing to discuss such a comparison have either:
1) Made up their own opinion and have such preference for one player or the other, despite stats or no stats. Their personal reason is justification enough. Nothing wrong with that imo, unless one crosses that line of being an annoying fanboi.
This is from the first page.
imefimef wrote:We all have rights to our opinions and i can't knock you for yours, but i'm not really asking for opinions
shadowgrin wrote:2) This kind of discussion has been done to death in the NLSC, or any basketball forum for that matter.
Especially with the limiting conditions you set forth in your thread. Comparing an 'older' player to a 26 year old freak of nature that hasn't even reached his prime yet? Might as well ask Kobe to jump over a moving truck irl.
It's like you made this thread and set the conditions so that you can stand up high in your soap box and enjoy looking down on others. How's the view up ther btw?
Though if you're lucky, you can force lurkers to actually post with such 'controversial' topics.
Regardless of what conditions i set, you chose to comment on it didn't you? If you ask right now who is the best, there are different aspects, longevity, winning e.t.c. but we can't argue on that because we don't know how either of their careers will end. The only thing we can talk about is the past and present. It would be stupid to argue about the past because, well, it's the past. The present on the other hand is now and that's what I am talking about, LeBron James is by far playing the best basketball right now and is the best player right now. Period. A fact, not an argument. If it is that i'm just a crazy person then i ask please give me reasons why it's Kobe and i hear shit like he has Shark blood, please GTFOH. That's not saying Kobe isn't good, but that LeBron is better. Not a diss to Kobe but a compliment to LeBron.
shadowgrin wrote:Jordan already had a decent mid-range game early in his career. In college even.
Kobe already had NBA range during his younger days. His problem then (and at times even now) was bad shot selection. Real bad shot selection, because he knew he can shoot that far which leads to some really ugly results (see LAL vs. Uta playoff series).
So you're ssaying we should discredit LeBron for having good shot selection there by taking shots he's better at which is attacking the basket? Yes that makes sense and about Jordan see my previous comment about Jordan's jumpshot. And even if so what? Kobe has a better jumpshot? SO! WHAT! I've said that myself multiple times, but is that reason enough why Kobe is better?
Devin Harris has a much better jumpshot than Rondo, and he takes more difficult shots than Rondo and makes more than Rondo and shoots better for freethrows, therefore he's better than Rondo. YES. That makes all the sense in the world.








