Poollit wrote:Remember when Kidd was traded to Nets and he really improved them, should he have gotten MVP?
If you say yes to that, but no to Nash; somethings wrong.
Consider this: Kidd and Nash both drastically improved their teams, which should be enough to deserve Most Valuable Player. Whether Nash is replaceable or not doesn't matter, he was very much a crucial part of his team. As the award implies the MOST crucial. Kidd was the same, but unlke Kidd, Nash's team is Number 1, which has a big role in MVP. Also Kidd had to compete with duncan who had his team at number 1 and also did it basically alone. Shaq on the other hand had Wade; who had a terrific rookie year and this was expected of him already whether Shaq was there or not.
Okay the flip side:
Yes NAsh MVP...it's funny he got it playing beside someone who averaged 26ppg and 9 rpg, Amare. Also how did he get it? He didn't improve anyone- Marion was already good, Amare was only bound to get better do this whether Nash was there or not. Q is excellent, Joe Johnson (look at Amare and Wade comment). Seriously! If anyone improved anyone it was Shaq! SHaq made players you never heard of decent players that you would consider to take on your team. Also if you want to talk about how Nash improved his team look at how Shaq leaving destroyed his last team. As much as I am a Kobe fan; really look at what Shaq did by leaving.
okay just wanted to put that up there to see the response, the reasonKidd did not get it like Nash is because back then Tim Duncan was a monster and NAsh's team was 1 and Duncan's 1. Shaq wasn't, this year. He was good but Timd Duncan just carried a team on his shoulders.
I'm not hating, no is, just disagring, u want to see hating?
Kobe Bryant is the best player in the L, he just had a rough season this year, watch the response that's hating
But I understand u use the word "hatin" lightly and others take it more serious, no worries. But serious Kobe is the best!
About Nash I think he did deserve it, but Shaq was also a big contender. I guess arguing that Nash didn't deserve it cause of Amare is not good because remember Shaq had Wade (killer, nother Kobe?) See? Then Marion, Eddie Jones, I know Marion is much better, but still... The team's were not THAT much different like people claim. Phoenix had a better team yes, but they also had a better record, so Nash made up the difference atleast.
any comments?
