air gordon wrote:isn't this 90's style of play your preference?

90s style of play? What, missing layups left and right, shooting under 40% in the paint, and launching 60+ threes? Not exactly.
I have no problems with the physicality, but the officiating was oftentimes inconsistent, illogical, or just downright wrong. It didn't decide the game, but the officials looked pretty incompetent, and that's certainly not to my preference.
air gordon wrote:agreed with green as the mvp. weak? nahh.
Perhaps weak is too strong of a word (ironically), but I don't think his performance has been particularly impressive. He now leads the team in scoring after that 38 point game (a number that was inflated by the stats padding at the end), and is averaging five rebounds and 4.8 assists, but he's also averaging 4.5 turnovers, hasn't shot the ball particularly well (especially by his standards) for most of the series, and hasn't really played MVP basketball for three out of the four games. If not for the play of guys like Green, Livingston, and Iguodala, the series could well be tied 2-2, or even 3-1 in the Cavs' favour. He hasn't looked like himself for 75% of the series so far.
Compare it to the great performances we've seen in past NBA Finals series, and I don't think it's nearly as impressive. Assuming he has a fine game in Game 5, I think he's got a legitimate case to be the MVP of this series. However, three very lacklustre performances and two good ones, including two games where another player put the team on their back, is not a particularly strong Finals MVP performance. Extremely weak, or completely undeserving? I probably wouldn't go that far, depending on what happens in Game 5, but like I said, it would be one of the weaker Finals MVP performances overall, compared to what others have done.